Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 1468–1472 | Cite as

The influence of internal stress and grain size on the behaviour of domain wall interaction in pure nickel and Ni-Cu alloys

  • A. R. Ali
  • M. A. Fahim
Papers

Abstract

The magnetic anisotropy,K, and the initial magnetic susceptibility, χa, were used to study the effect of internal stress and grain size on the interaction of lattice defects with magnetic domain walls under moderately strong magnetic fields in pure nickel and Ni-Cu alloys. The observed dependence ofK and χa on the internal stress was attributed to the existence of structural defects producing a configuration of potential energy controlling the location of magnetic domains and the strength of magnetic pressure in the nickel matrix. The effect of grain size onK and χa was investigated, and the domain wall thickness was calculated. The existence of copper solute atoms in the nickel matrix was found to have an effect on both the magnetic anisotropy and initial magnetic susceptibility. This is assumed to be due to the induced magnetic free poles resulting from the magnetization variations produced by solute atoms in the matrix.

Keywords

Domain Wall Magnetic Anisotropy Strong Magnetic Field Magnetic Pressure Pure Nickel 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. F. Krause andB. D. Cullity,J. appl. Phys. 39 (1968) 5532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. R. Ali andM. A. Fahim.Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 109 (1988) 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Kronmuller,Z. angew. Phys. 30 (1970) 9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. A. Fahim andA. R. Ali,Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 108 (1988) 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. R. Ali andG. Said,Physica (Utrecht) B112 (1982) 241.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. C. Jiles andD. L. Atherton,J. Magn. magn. Mater. 61 (1986) 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Soshin Chikazumi, “Physics of Magnetism” (Wiley, London, 1964) p. 277.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Czerlinsky,Ann. Physik. V13 (1932) 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. R. Ali et al., Physica (Utrecht) B112, (1982) 245.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. C. Jiles,Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 108 (1988) 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Globus,J. Phys. 38 (1977) C1–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Guyot andA. Globus,Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 59 (1973) 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Globus, in Proceedings of a Soft Magnetic Materials Conference, Cardiff, 1975.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Neel,Ann. Univ. Grenoble 22 (1946) 299;J. Phys. Radium 11 (1950) 49.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Soshin Chikazumi, “Physics of Magnetism” (Wiley, London, 1964) p. 215.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. R. Ali
    • 1
  • M. A. Fahim
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics Department, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of CairoGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations