Advertisement

Pflügers Archiv

, Volume 402, Issue 1, pp 18–23 | Cite as

Single K+ channels in membrane evaginations of smooth muscle cells

  • W. Berger
  • R. Grygorcyk
  • W. Schwarz
Excitable Tissues and Central Nervous Physiology

Abstract

Attempts have been made to apply the patch-clamp technique to enzymatically dispersed smooth muscle cells of frog and toad stomach. The rate of successful gigaseal formation has been extremely low, but better results can be obtained when patches are taken from membrane evaginations which develop on single cells after mechanical agitation and incubation in Ca2+-containing solutions at 25° C. Also ball-shaped single cells formed by the confluence of membrane evaginations were found to be equally useful for patch-clamp studies. Giga-seal formation was obtained in more than 80% of all attempts. Electron micrographs indicate that the myofilaments in membrane evaginations an in ball-shaped cells are separated from the cell membrane. Channel activity in membrane patches of such “myoballs” or evaginations is similar to the channel activity as found in intact cells. Two types of K+ channels (100 and 200 pS) have been observed that can be blocked by tetraethylammonium. Channels with the conductance of 200 pS are activated by intracellular Ca2+. The formation of evaginations has also been observed in other cells and may help to apply the patch-clamp technique to cells contaminated with surface coats.

Key words

Single smooth muscle cell Patch clamp Potassium channel Membrane evagination 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bagby RM, Young AM, Dotson RK, Fisher BA, McKinnon K (1971) Contraction of single smooth muscle cells from Buffo marinus stomach. Nature 234:351–352Google Scholar
  2. Barth LG, Barth LJ (1959) Differentiation of cells of the Rana pipiens gastrula in unconditioned medium. J Embryol Exp Morphol 7:210–222Google Scholar
  3. Benham CD, Bolton TB (1983) Patch-clamp studies of slow potential-sensitive potassium channels in longitudinal smooth muscle cells of rabbit jejunum. J Physiol (Lond) 340:469–486Google Scholar
  4. Benham CD, Bolton TB, Lang RJ (1983) Patch-clamp studies of the action of K+-channel blockers on two types of K+ channels in dispersed smooth muscle cells of rabbit jejunum. J Physiol (Lond) 341:23p-24pGoogle Scholar
  5. Bemham CD, Bolton TB, Lang RJ, Takewaki T (1984) Calcium-dependent K+ channels in dispersed intestinal and arterial smooth muscle cells of guinea-pigs and rabbits studied by the patch-calmp technique. J Physiol (Lond) 350:53pGoogle Scholar
  6. Colquhoun D, Neher E, Reuter H, Stevens CF (1981) Inward current channels activated by intracellular Ca in cultured cardiac cells. Nature 294:752–754Google Scholar
  7. Fay SF, Delise CM (1973) Contraction of isolated smooth muscle cells — Structural changes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:641–645Google Scholar
  8. Gorman ALF, Hermann A, Thomas MV (1981) Intracellular calcium and the control of neural pacemaker activity. Fed Proc 40:2233–2239Google Scholar
  9. Grout BWW, Fuller BJ (1982) Hepatocyte plasma membrane response to hypertonic stress and related cell viability. Cryo Letters 3:51–56Google Scholar
  10. Grygorczyk R, Schwarz W (1984) Inhibition of Ca2+-activated K+ channels in human erythrocytes. Pflügers Arch 400:R 25 (Suppl)Google Scholar
  11. Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ (1981) Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflügers Arch 391:85–100Google Scholar
  12. Labarca PP, Miller C (1981) A K+-selective, three-state channel from fragmented sarcoplasmic reticulum of frog leg muscle. J Membrane Biol 61:31–38Google Scholar
  13. McLellan MR, Morris GJ, Kalinina LV (1982) Membrane evagination from Amoeba proteus in response to stress under isotonic conditions. Cryo-Letters 3:35–40Google Scholar
  14. Meech RW (1978) Calcium-dependent potassium activation in nervous tissues. Ann Rev Biophys Bioeng 7:1–18Google Scholar
  15. Schwarz W, Neumcke B, Palade PT (1981) K-current fluctuations in inward-rectifying channels of frog skeletal muscle. J Membrane Biol 63:85–92Google Scholar
  16. Singer JJ, Walsh JV (1982) Single-channel currents recorded in freshly dissociated vertebrate smooth muscle cells using the patch-clamp technique. J Gen Physiol 8:23a-24aGoogle Scholar
  17. Singer JJ, Walsh JV (1984) Large conductance Ca++-activated K+ channels in smooth muscle cell membrane: Reduction in unitary currents due to internal Na+ ions. Biophys J 45:68–70Google Scholar
  18. Stämpfli R, Westerheide G (1959) Die Verwendung eines Bündels aus der Ringmuskulatur des Forschmagens zur Untersuchung der Eigenschaften glatter Muskelfasern. Helv Physiol Acta 17:C 42Google Scholar
  19. Walsh JV, Singer JJ (1981) Voltage clamp of single freshly dissociated smooth muscle cells: Current-voltage relationships for three currents. Pflügers Arch 390:207–210Google Scholar
  20. Yellen G (1982) Singe Ca2+-activated non-selective cation channels in neuro-blastoma. Nature 296:357–359Google Scholar
  21. Zollinger UH (1948) Cytological studies with the phase microscope. I. The formation of “blisters” on cells in suspension (Potocytosis), with observations on the nature of the cellular membrane. Am J Pathol 24:545–558Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Berger
    • 1
  • R. Grygorcyk
    • 2
  • W. Schwarz
    • 2
  1. 1.I. Physiologisches Institut der Universität des SaarlandesHomburg-Saar
  2. 2.Max-Planck-Institut für BiophysikFrankfurt/M-71Germany

Personalised recommendations