Advertisement

Pflügers Archiv

, Volume 389, Issue 3, pp 283–291 | Cite as

The time course of the muscarinic response to ionophoretic acetylcholine application to the S-A node of the rabbit heart

  • W. Osterrieder
  • Q. Yang
  • W. Trautwein
Excitable Tissues and Central Nervous Physiology

Abstract

  1. 1.

    In the rabbit S-A node the factors which control the time course of hyperpolarizations (muscarinic response) induced by ionophoretic application of acetylcholine were studied.

     
  2. 2.

    The muscarinic response is characterized by an apparent delay of minimally 30 ms and a slow rise to the peak. The time to peak rises continually from about 200 ms to 1,000 ms when the amount of ACh released is increased.

     
  3. 3.

    For a given strong releasing pulse both peak time and delay time depend on the distance of the pipette tip to the surface of the preparation with a power of 2 for large distances (about >60 μm). For shorter pipette distances the peak time remains constant, and it was concluded that for this location the chemical reactions of agonist binding and channel opening are slow compared to the change of ACh concentration (non-equilibrium) and possibly saturation occurs.

     
  4. 4.

    Peak shape and total duration of the response are strongly influenced by the activity of the tissue cholinesterase: In the presence of neostigmine the same amount of ACh released produces a larger and longer response. Lowering the temperature from 37°C to 27°C prolongs the peak time by a factor of 1.7–2.1.

     
  5. 5.

    The hyperpolarizations could be reconstructed on the basis of the Katz-Miledi model including the rate constants of the opening and closing of the ion channel, and the diffusion of the agonist in the sinus node preparation with a low density of muscarinic receptors. The calculations suggest that the apparent delay is mainly due to the kinetics of the ion channel and that diffusion determines the slow time course of the response.

     
  6. 6.

    The model simulates changes of the external factors which strongly influence the shape of the response (e.g. strength of the releasing pulse, temperature and activity of the cholinesterase).

     

Key words

S-A node Muscarinic response ACh-activated potassium channel Ionophoresis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Castillo J del, Katz B (1955) Production of membrane potential changes in the frog's heart by inhibitory nerve impulses. Nature 175:1035Google Scholar
  2. Castillo J del, Katz B (1957) Interaction at end-plate receptors between different choline derivatives. Proc R Soc Lond B 146:369–381Google Scholar
  3. Dreyer F, Peper K (1974) Ionophoretic application of acetylcholine: advantages of high resistance micropipettes in connection with an electronic current pump. Pflügers Arch 348:263–272Google Scholar
  4. Dreyer F, Peper K, Sterz R (1978) Determination of dose-response curves by quantitative ionophoresis at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol (Lond) 281:395–419Google Scholar
  5. Garnier D, Nargeot J, Ojeda C, Rougier O (1978) The action of acetylcholine on background conductance in frog atrial trabeculae. J Physiol (Lond) 274:381–396Google Scholar
  6. Glitsch HG, Pott L (1978) Effects of acetylcholine and parasympathetic nerve stimulation on membrane potential in quiescent guinea-pig atria. J Physiol (Lond) 279:655–668Google Scholar
  7. Hartzell HC (1980) Distribution of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors and presynaptic nerve terminals in amphibian heart. J Cell Biol 86:6–20Google Scholar
  8. Hartzell HC, Kuffler SW, Stickgold R, Yoshikami D (1977) Synaptic excitation and inhibition resulting from direct action of acetylcholine on two types of chemoreceptors on individual amphibian parasympathetic neurons. J Physiol (Lond) 271:817–846Google Scholar
  9. Hill-Smith I, Purves RD (1978) Synaptic delay in the heart: an ionophoretic study. J Physiol (Lond) 279:31–54Google Scholar
  10. Hutter OF, Trautwein W (1956) Vagal and sympathetic effects on the pacemaker fibres in the sinus venosus of the heart. J Gen Physiol 39:715–733Google Scholar
  11. Katz B, Miledi R (1972) The statistical nature of the acetylcholine potentials and its molecular components. J Physiol (Lond) 224:665–699Google Scholar
  12. Krnjević K, Mitchell JF (1960) Diffusion of acetylcholine in agar gels and in the rat diaphragm. J Physiol (Lond) 153:562–572Google Scholar
  13. Mittag TW, Ehrenpreis S, Patrick P (1971) Some properties of cholinesterases in intact guinea-pig ileum in vitro. Arch Int Pharmacodyn 191:270–278Google Scholar
  14. Noma A, Irisawa H (1976) Membrane currents in the rabbit sinoatrial node cell as studied by the double microelectrode method. Pflügers Arch 364:45–52Google Scholar
  15. Noma A, Trautwein W (1978) Relaxation of the ACh-induced potassium current in the rabbit sinoatrial node cell. Pflügers Arch 377:193–200Google Scholar
  16. Noma A, DiFrancesco D, Trautwein W (1978) Dose-response curve for acetylcholine (ACh) and carbamylcholine (CCh) in the rabbit S-A node. Pflügers Arch 377:R4Google Scholar
  17. Noma A, Osterrieder W, Trautwein W (1979) The effect of external potassium on the elementary conductance of the ACh-induced potassium channel in the sino-atrial node. Pflügers Arch 381:263–269Google Scholar
  18. Noma A, Peper K, Trautwein W (1979) Acetylcholine-induced potassium current fluctuations in the rabbit sino-atrial node. Pflügers Arch 381:255–262Google Scholar
  19. Osterrieder W, Noma A, Trautwein W (1980) On the kinetics of the potassium channel activated by acetylcholine in the S-A node of the rabbit heart. Pflügers Arch 386:101–109Google Scholar
  20. Peper K, Dreyer F, Müller KD (1975) Analysis of cooperativity of drug-receptor interaction by quantitative ionophoresis at frog motor endplates. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 40:187–192Google Scholar
  21. Pott L (1979) On the time course of the acetylcholine-induced hyperpolarization in quiescent guinea pig atria. Pflügers Arch 380:71–77Google Scholar
  22. Pott L, Pusch H (1979) A kinetic model for the muscarinic action of acetylcholine. Pflügers Arch 383:75–77Google Scholar
  23. Purves RD (1976) Function of muscarinic and nictotinic acetylcholine receptors. Nature 261:149–151Google Scholar
  24. Purves RD (1977) The time course of cellular response to ionophoretically applied drugs. J Theor Biol 65:327–344Google Scholar
  25. Steinbach JH, Stevens CF (1976) Neuromuscular transmission. In: Llinás R, Precht W (eds) Frog neurobiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 33–92Google Scholar
  26. Toda N, West TC (1965) Changes in sino-atrial transmembrane potentials on vagal stimulation of the isolated rabbit atrium. Nature 205:808–809Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Osterrieder
    • 1
  • Q. Yang
    • 1
  • W. Trautwein
    • 1
  1. 1.II. Physiologisches Institut der Universität des SaarlandesHomburg/SaarFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations