Abstract
The calcium channel-inhibiting drugs nitrendipine and diltiazem represent two important classes of organic calcium antagonists. In the present study, the effect of these drugs on calcium currents and charge displacement currents in bullfrog semitendinosus muscle fibers was examined using a vaseline gap voltage clamp. Nitrendipine (10 μM) reduced the quantity of charge that moved both during the ON phase (QON) and the OFF phase (QOFF) of charge movement. This action appeared to be most selective for QON. However, at this same concentration, nitrendipine had no blocking action on inward calcium currents. In contrast to these findings, diltiazem blocked calcium currents in a concentration-dependent manner, while slightly increasing the quantity of charge moved during QON and QOFF. The enhancement of charge movement by diltiazem resulted from two actions. First, diltiazem shifted the voltage-dependence of charge movement to more negative potentials. Second, diltiazem increased the maximum amount of charge moved. (Supported by NIH NS 03178 and HL 07382.)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Almers W, McClesky EW (1984) Non-selective conductance in calcium channels of frog muscle: calcium selectivity in a single-file pore. J Physiol 353: 585–608
Almers W, Palade PT (1981) Slow calcium and potassium currents across frog muscle membrane: measurements with a vaseline-gap technique. J Physiol 312: 159–176
DeCoursey TE, Bryant SH, Lipicky RJ (1982) Sodium currents in human skeletal muscle fibers. Muscle α Nerve 5: 614–618
Fosset M, Jaimovich E, Delpont E, Lazdunski M (1983) [3H]Nitrendipine receptors in skeletal muscle: properties and preferential localization in transverse tubules. J Biol Chem 258: 6086–6092
Galizzi J, Borsotto M, Fosset M, Lazdunski M (1986) Characterization and photoaffinity labeling of receptor sites for the Ca2+ channel inhibitors d-cis-Diltiazem, (+/-)-Bepridil, Desmethoxy-verapamil, and (+)-PN 200-110 in skeletal muscle transverse tubule membranes. J Biol Chem 261: 1393–1397
Gonzalez-Serratos H, Valle-Aguilera R, Lathrop DA, del Carmen-Garcia M (1982) Slow inward calcium currents have no obvious role in muscle excitation-contraction coupling. Nature 298: 292–294
Hille B, Campbell DT (1976) An improved vaseline gap voltage clamp for skeletal muscle fibers. J Gen Physiol 67: 265–293
Huang CL-H (1982) Pharmacological separation of charge movement components in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol 324: 375–387
Hui CS (1983) Pharmacological studies of charge movement in frog skeletal muscle. J Physiol 337: 509–529
Hui CS, Milton RL, Eisenberg RS (1984) Charge movement in skeletal muscle fibers paralyzed by the calcium-entry blocker D600. Proc Natl Acad Sci 81: 2582–2585
Lamb GD (1986) Components of asymmetric charge movement in contracting skeletal muscle fibres of the rabbit. Biophys J 49: 12a
Rios E, Brum G, Stefani E (1986) E-C coupling effects of interventions that reduce slow Ca current suggest a role of T-tubule Ca channels in skeletal muscle function. Biophys J 49: 13a
Sanchez JA, Stefani E (1978) Inward calcium current in twitch muscle fibres of the frog. J Physiol 283: 197–209
Schneider MF, Chandler WK (1973) Voltage dependent charge movement in skeletal muscle: a possible step in excitation-contraction coupling. Nature 242: 244–246
Schwartz A, Triggle DJ (1984) Cellular action of calcium channel blocking drugs. Ann Rev Med 35: 325–356
Schwartz LM, McClesky EM, Almers W (1985) Dihydropyridine receptors in muscle are voltage-dependent but most are not functional calcium channels. Nature 314: 747–751
Stanfield PR (1977) A calcium dependent inward current in frog skeletal muscle fibres. Pflugers Arch 368: 267–270
Walsh KB, Bryant SH, Schwartz A (1986) Effect of calcium antagonist drugs on calcium currents in mammalian skeletal muscle fibers. J Pharm Exp Ther 236: 403–407
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walsh, K.B., Bryant, S.H. & Schwartz, A. Suppression of charge movement by calcium antagonists is not related to calcium channel block. Pflugers Arch. 409, 217–219 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00584775
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00584775