Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 389–426 | Cite as


  • Pauline Jacobson


Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ades, A. and M. Steedman: 1982, ‘On the order of words’,Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 517–58.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, E.: 1979, ‘Control in Montague Grammar’,Linguistic Inquiry 10, 297–341.Google Scholar
  3. Berwick, R. and A. Weinberg: 1982, ‘Parsing Efficiency, Computational Complexity, and the Evaluation of Grammatical Theories’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 165–92.Google Scholar
  4. Bresnan, J.: 1971, ‘Sentence Stress and Syntactic Transformations’,Language 47, 297–321.Google Scholar
  5. Chierchia, G.: 1984,Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachussetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  6. Chierchia, G.: to appear, ‘Aspects of a Categorial Theory of Binding’, in E., Bach, R. Oehrle and D. Wheeler (eds.)Categorial Grammar and Natural Language Structures. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  7. Chierchia, G. and P. Jacobson: 1986, ‘Local and Long Distance Control’, in S. Berman (ed.), Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Linguistic Society, Graduate Student Linguistics Association, University of Massachussetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  8. Chomsky, N.: 1973, ‘Conditions on Transformations’, in N. Chomsky,Essays on Form and Interpretation, North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, 1977.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, N.: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N.: 1982,Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N.: 1986,Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  12. Chung, S.: 1983, ‘The ECP and Government in Chamorro’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 207–244.Google Scholar
  13. Dowty, D.: 1978, ‘Governed Transformations as Lexical Rules in a Montague Grammar’,Linguistic Inquiry 9, 393–426.Google Scholar
  14. Dowty, D.: 1985, ‘On recent analyses of the semantics of control’,Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 291–331.Google Scholar
  15. Engdahl, E.: 1984, ‘Why Some Empty Subjects Don't License Parasitic Gaps’, in M. Cobler, S. MacKaye and M. Wescoat (eds.),Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 3, Stanford Linguistics Department, Stanford, pp. 91–104.Google Scholar
  16. Farkas, D., D. Flickinger, G. Gazdar, W. Ladusaw, A. Ojeda, J. Pinkham, G. Pullum and P. Sells: 1983,Some Revisions to the Theory of Features and Feature Instantiation, manuscript, UCLA.Google Scholar
  17. Flickinger, D.: 1983, ‘Lexical Heads and Phrasal Gaps’, in M. Barlow, D. Flickinger, and M. Wescoat (eds.),Proceedings of the Second West Coast Conference of Formal Linguistics. Stanford Linguistics Department, Stanford, pp. 89–101.Google Scholar
  18. Gazdar, G.: 1979a,Phrase Structure Grammar, unpublished manuscript, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  19. Gazdar, G.: 1979b,English as a Context-Free Language. unpublished manuscript, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  20. Gazdar, G.: 1981, ‘Unbounded Dependencies and Coordinate Structure’,Linguistic Inquiry 12, 155–84.Google Scholar
  21. Gazdar, G.: 1982, ‘Phrase StructureGrammar’, in P. Jacobson and G. K. Pullum (eds.),The Nature of Syntactic Representation. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 131–86.Google Scholar
  22. Gazdar, G., E. Klein, G. Pullum and I. Sag: 1982, ‘Coordinate Structure and Unbounded Dependencies’, in M. Barlow, D. Fickinger and I. Sag (eds.),Developments in Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar: Stanford Working Papers in Grammatical Theory, Vol. 2. Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, pp. 38–68.Google Scholar
  23. Hendriks, H.: 1986,Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar and Montague Grammar, M.A. thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  24. Hirschbühler, P.: 1979,The Syntax and Semantics of Wh-constructions, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachussetts, Indiana University Linguistic Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  25. Jacobson, P.: 1983,Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations, manuscript, Brown University, portions presented as a Colloquium talk at the 1983 Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  26. Jacobson, P.: 1984, ‘Connectivity in Phrase Structure Grammar’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1, 535–81.Google Scholar
  27. Jacobson, P.: 1987, ‘Phrase Structure Grammatical Relations and Discontinuous Constituents’, in G. Huck and A. Ojeda (eds.),Syntax and Semantics 20: Discontinuous Constituency, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Karttunen, L.: 1977, ‘Syntax and Semantics of Questions’,Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3–44.Google Scholar
  29. Kayne, R.: 1983, ‘Connectedness’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 223–49.Google Scholar
  30. Kuno, S.: 1973, ‘Constraints on Internal Clauses and Sentential Subjects’,Linguistic Inquiry 4, 363–85.Google Scholar
  31. Lee, I-H.: 1985, ‘Multiple Wh-Questions in GPSG’,Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
  32. Lasnik, H. and R. Fiengo: 1974, ‘Complement Object Deletion’,Linguistic Inquiry 5, 535–71.Google Scholar
  33. Nichigauchi, T.: 1984, ‘Control and the Thematics Domain’,Language 60, 397–414.Google Scholar
  34. Perlmutter, D.: 1971,Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Peters, S. and H. Uszkoreit: 1982,Essential Variables in Metarules, paper presented at the 1982 Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Diego.Google Scholar
  36. Pollard, C.: 1984,Generalized Phrase Structure Grammars, Head Grammars, and Natural Languages, Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  37. Ross, J.: 1967,Constraints on Variables in Syntax, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  38. Sag, L.: 1982, ‘Coordination, Extraction, and Generalized Phrase Structure’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 329–36.Google Scholar
  39. Sells, P.: 1984,Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachussetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  40. Steedman, M.: 1985, ‘Dependency and Coordination in the Grammar of Dutch and English’,Language 61, 523–68.Google Scholar
  41. Steedman, M.: 1986,Combinatory Grammars and Parasitic Gaps, manuscript, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  42. Stowell, T.: 1981,Origins of Phrase Structure, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  43. Warner, A.: 1986,Coordination, Person and Number in Generalized PHRASE Structure Grammar, manuscript University of York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pauline Jacobson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations