Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of non-response bias on the results of two-stage screening surveys of psychiatric disorder

  • Other Studies
  • Published:
Social psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effects are examined of two varieties of non-response bias (that due to “illness” and that due to “defensiveness”, as defined in this paper) on two-stage screening surveys for psychiatric disorder. Equations to model these effects are first derived; these are then used, in conjunction with pre-existing data, to estimate the sixe of the non-response bias. It is concluded (a) that “bias due to illness” results in prevalence estimates being some 5% lower than the true prevalence; (b) that specificity is little affected by either variety of bias; but that (c) “bias due to defensiveness” results in the sensitivity being overestimated by about 6%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blum RH (1962) Case identification in psychiatric epidemiology: methods and problems. Milbank Mem Fund Q 40: 253–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstein L, Freeman H, Sirotnik KA, Delandshire G, Hollis M (1985) Data collection: the Achilles heel of evaluation research. Sociological Methods and Research 14: 65–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark VA, Aneshensel CS, Frerichs RR, Morgan TM (1983) Analysis of non-response in a prospective study of depression in Los Angeles county. Int J Epidemiol 12: 193–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox A, Rutter M, Yule B, Quinton D (1977) Bias resulting from missing information: some epidemiological findings. Br J Prev Soc Med 31: 131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood MR (1971) Screening for psychiatric disorder. Psychol Med 1: 197–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D (1978) Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. NFER, Windsor

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D (1981) Estimating the prevalence of psychiatric disorder from the results of a screening test. In: Wing JK, Bebbington P, Robins L (eds) What is a case? The problem of definition in psychiatric community surveys. Grant McIntyre London, 129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg D, Huxley P (1980) Mental illness in the community: the pathway to psychiatric care. Tavistock Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberlein TA, Baumgartner R (1978) Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: a quantitative analysis of the published literature. Am Sociol Rev 43: 447–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins R, Macdonald A, Murray J, Strathdee G (1982) Minor psychiatric morbidity and the threat of redundancy in a professional group. Psychol Med 12: 799–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Mari J, Williams P (1986) Misclassification by psychiatric screening questionnaires. J Chronic Dis (in press)

  • Sackett DL (1979) Bias in analytic research. J Chronic Dis 32: 51–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh K, Mattingly S (1981) Investigating non-response bias in mail surveys. J Epidemiol Community Health 35: 293–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P, Tarnopolsky A, Hand D (1980) Case definition and case identification in psychiatric epidemiology: review and assessment. Psychol Med 10: 101–114

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Williams, P., Macdonald, A. The effect of non-response bias on the results of two-stage screening surveys of psychiatric disorder. Soc Psychiatry 21, 182–186 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00583998

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00583998

Keywords

Navigation