Advertisement

Pflügers Archiv

, Volume 403, Issue 3, pp 245–257 | Cite as

Responses of Renshaw cells coupled with hindlimb extensor motoneurons to sinusoidal stimulation of labyrinth receptors in the decerebrate cat

  • O. Pompeiano
  • P. Wand
  • U. C. Srivastava
Excitable Tissues and Central Nervous Physiology

Abstract

  1. 1.

    Contraction of ipsilateral limb extensors during side-down roll tilt of the head, leading to selective stimulation of labyrinth receptors, is attributed to an increased discharge of excitatory vestibulospinal (VS) neurons (α-responses) and a decreased discharge of medullary inhibitory reticulospinal (RS) neurons (β-responses), both of which act on ipsilateral extensor motoneurons.

     
  2. 2.

    Experiments were performed in decerebrate cats, with the de-efferented gastrocnemius-soleus (GS) muscle fixed at a constant length, to find out whether Renshaw (R) cells linked with GS motoneurons responded to labyrinth stimulation elicited by head rotation, while the neck had been bilaterally deafferented. We hoped in this way to clarify the role and the mechanism by which these inhibitory interneurons act on limb extensor motoneurons during the vestibular reflexes.

     
  3. 3.

    72.7% of the R-cells, disynaptically excited by group I volleys elicited by single shock stimulation of the GS nerve, weakly responded to head rotation at frequencies of 0.026–0.15 Hz and at a peak amplitude of 10°.

     
  4. 4.

    For the frequency of head rotation of 0.026 Hz, ±10°C, most of the GS R-cells increased their firing rate during side-down head displacement (α-responses); some responses were related to head position, but others showed some phase lead or lag with respect to head position. The gain of the first harmonic of these unit responses was very low and corresponded on the average to 0.084±0.062, S.D. imp./s/deg, while the sensitivity corresponded to 2.14±2.35, S.D.%/deg (base frequency, 6.85±5.97, S.D.imp./s). These responses were attributed to the activity of VS neurons, the increased discharge of which during side-down head rotation exerts a weak excitatory influence on a limited number of GS motoneurons and, through their recurrent collaterals, on the related R-cells.

     
  5. 5.

    The modulation of the firing rate of R-cells coupled with the GS motoneurons increased linearly by increasing the peak amplitude of displacement from 5° to 20° at the frequency of 0.026 Hz, so that the response gain remained almost unchanged.

     
  6. 6.

    An increase in frequency of head rotation from 0.026 to 0.32 Hz at a fixed amplitude of 10°, thus changing the maximal angular acceleration from 0.26°/s2 to 41.7°/s2, reversed the response pattern of R-cells reported above. The resulting β-responses, which also showed some phase lead or lag with respect to head position, were attributed to vestibular activation of RS neurons. These neurons may directly excite the R-cells linked with the GS motoneurons, so that their reduced discharge during side-down head rotation would lead to a decrease in firing rate of the corresponding inhibitory interneurons. Interestingly, the response gain and sensitivity of these R-cells first decreased but then increased after reversal of the response pattern, by increasing frequency of head rotation. The critical frequency at which a cancellation of the response occurred before the response pattern was reversed, ranged between 0.051 and 0.15 Hz.

     
  7. 7.

    In conclusion, R-cells linked with the GS motoneurons displayed an α-pattern of response during low frequency head rotation, suggesting that they were largely activated by the recurrent collaterals of the corresponding motoneurons driven by the VS volleys. The same R-cells, however, exhibited the opposite β-pattern of response at higher stimulus frequencies, thus behaving as if they were decoupled from their input motoneurons and controlled more directly by the medullary RS neurons. In these instances, activation of GS motoneurons during side-down head rotation could be attributed not only to an increased discharge of the excitatory VS neurons, but also to a reduced discharge of the R-cells driven by the medullary RS neurons. This system may thus contribute to the gain regulation of the EMG responses of hindlimb extensors to labyrinth stimulation.

     

Key words

Recurrent inhibition Renshaw cells Extensor motoneurons Vestibulospinal influences Head rotation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anden N-E, Jukes MGM, Lundberg A, Byklický L (1966) The effect of DOPA on the spinal cord. 1. Influence on transmission from primary afferents. Acta Physiol Scand 67:373–386Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson JH, Blanks RHI, Precht W (1978) Response characteristics of semicircular canal and otolith systems in cat. I. Dynamic response of primary vestibular fibers. Exp Brain Res 32:491–507Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benecke R, Hellweg C, Meyer-Lohmann J (1974) Activity and excitability of Renshaw cells in non-decerebrate and decerebrate cats. Exp Brain Res 21:113–124Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benecke R, Meyer-Lohmann J, Guntau J (1976) Inverse changes in the excitability of Renshaw cells and α-motoneurones induced by interpositus stimulation. Pflügers Arch (Suppl) 365:40Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boyle R, Pompeiano O (1980) Reciprocal responses to sinusoidal tilt of neurons in Deiters' nucleus and their dynamic characteristics. Arch Ital Biol 118:1–32Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boyle R, Pompeiano O (1981) Convergence and interaction of neck and macular vestibular inputs on vestibulospinal neurons. J Neurophysiol 45:852–868Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boyle R, Pompeiano O (1984) Discharge activity of spindle afferents from the gastrocnemius-soleus muscle during head rotation in the decerebrate cat. Pflügers Arch 400:140–150Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cullheim S, Kellerth J-O (1978) A morphological study of the axons and recurrent axon collaterals of cat α-motoneurones supplying different functional types of muscle unit. J Physiol (Lond) 281:301–313Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Denoth F, Magherini PC, Pompeiano O, Stanojević M (1979) Responses of Purkinje cells of the cerebellar vermis to neck and macular vestibular inputs. Pflügers Arch 381:87–98Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eccles JC, Fatt P, Koketsu K (1954) Cholinergic and inhibitory synapses in a pathway from motor axon collaterals to motoneurones. J Physiol (Lond) 126:524–562Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fernández C, Goldberg JM (1976) Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. I. Response to static tilts and to long-duration centrifugal force. J Neurophysiol 39:970–984Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fernández C, Goldberg JM, Abend WK (1973) Response to static tilts of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. J Neurophysiol 36:978–997Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldberg JM, Fernández C (1975) Vestibular mechanisms. Ann Rev Physiol 37:129–162Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Granit R, Haase J, Rutledge LT (1960) Recurrent inhibition in relation to frequency of firing and limitation of discharge rate of extensor motoneurones. J Physiol (Lond) 154:308–328Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Haase J, van der Meulen JD (1961) Effects of supraspinal stimulation on Renshaw cells belonging to extensor motoneurones. J Neurophysiol 24:510–520Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haase J, Vogel B (1971) Die Erregung der Renshaw-Zellen durch reflektorische Entladungen der α-Motoneurone. Pflügers Arch 325:14–27Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haase J, Vogel B (1971) Direkte und indirekte Wirkungen supraspinaler Reizungen auf Renshaw-Zellen. Pflügers Arch 325:334–346Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Henatsch H-D, Kaese H-J, Langrehr D, Meyer-Lohmann J (1961) Einflüsse des motorischen Cortex der Katze auf die Renshaw-Rückkopplungshemmung der Motoneurone. Pflügers Arch 274:51–52Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jankowska E, Lund S, Lundberg A, Pompeiano O (1968) Inhibitory effects evoked through ventral reticulospinal pathways. Arch Ital Biol 106:124–140Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Koehler W, Windhorst U, Schmidt J, Meyer-Lohmann J, Henatsch H-D (1978) Diverging influences on Renshaw cell responses and monosynaptic reflexes from stimulation of capsula interna. Neuroscience Lett 8:35–39Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koizumi K, Ushiyama J, Brooks CMcC (1959) A study of reticular formation action on spinal interneurones and motoneurones. Jap J Physiol 9:282–303Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lindsay KW, Roberts TDM, Rosenberg JR (1976) Asymmetric tonic labyrinth reflexes and their interaction with neck reflexes in the decerebrate cat. J Physiol (Lond) 261:583–601Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Llinás R, Terzuolo CA (1964) Mechanisms of supraspinal actions upon spinal cord activities. Reticular inhibitory mechanisms on alpha extensor motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 27:579–591Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Loe PR, Tomko DL, Werner G (1973) The neural signal of angular head position in primary afferent vestibular nerve axons. J Physiol (Lond) 230:29–50Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lund S, Pompeinano O (1968) Monosynaptic excitation of alpha-motoneurons from supraspinal structures in the cat. Acta Physiol Scand 73:1–21Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    MacLean JB, Leffman H (1967) Supraspinal control of Renshaw cells. Exp Neurol 18:94–104Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Magoun HW, Rhines R (1946) An inhibitory mechanism in the bulbar reticular formation. J Neurophysiol 9:165–171Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Manzoni D, Pompeiano O, Srivastava UC, Stampacchia G (1983) Responses of forelimb extensors to sinusoidal stimulation of macular labyrinth and neck receptors. Arch Ital Biol 121:205–214Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Manzoni D, Pompeiano O, Stampacchia G, Srivastava UC (1983) Responses of medullary reticulospinal neurons to sinusoidal stimulation of labyrinth receptors in decerebrate cat. J Neurophysiol 50:1059–1079Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Peterson BP, Pitts NG, Fukushima K (1979) Reticulospinal connections with limb and axial motoneurons. Exp Brain Res 36:1–20Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pompeiano O (1975) Macular input to neurons of the spinoreticulocerebellar pathway. Brain Res 95:351–368Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pompeiano O (1975) Vestibulo-spinal relationships. In: Naunton RF (ed) The vestibular system. Academic Press, New York San Francisco London, pp 147–180Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pompciano O (1979) Neck and macular labyrinthine influences on the cervical spino-reticulocerebellar pathway. Progr Brain Res 50:501–514Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pompeiano O (1984) Recurrent inhibition. In: Davidoff RA (ed) Handbook of the spinal cord, vol 2–3. Marcell Dekker Inc, New York, pp 461–557Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pompeiano O, Wand P (1976) The relative sensitivity of Renshaw cells to static and dynamic changes in muscle length. Progr Brain Res 44:199–222Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pompeiano O, Wand P, Sontag K-H (1975) Response of Renshaw cells to sinusoidal stretch of hindlimb extensor muscles. Arch Ital Biol 113:205–237Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pompeiano O, Wand P, Sontag K-H (1975) The relative sensitivity of Renshaw cells to orthodromic group I a volleys caused by static stretch and vibration of extensor muscles. Arch Ital Biol 113:238–279Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pompeiano O, Wand P, Srivastava UC (1983) Labyrinthine influences on Renshaw cells coupled with gastrocnemius-soleus (GS) motoneurons. Proc XXIX Int Congr Physiol Sci, Sydney 15:85Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pompeiano O, Wand P, Srivastava UC (1984) Influence of Renshaw cells on the response gain of hindlimb extensor muscles to sinusoidal labryrinth stimulation. Pflügers Arch (in press)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Renshaw B (1946) Central effects of centripetal impulses in axons of spinal ventral roots. J Neurophysiol 9:191–204Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ross H-G, Cleveland S, Haase J (1972) Quantitative relation of Renshaw cell discharge to monosynaptic reflex height. Pflügers Arch 332:73–79Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ryall RW, Piercey MF, Polosa C, Goldfarb J (1972) Excitation of Renshaw cells in relation to orthodromic and antidromic excitation of motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 35:137–148Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schor RH, Miller AD (1981) Vestibular reflexes in neck and forelimb muscles evoked by roll tilt. J Neurophysiol 46:167–178Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schor RH, Miller AD (1982) Relationship of cat vestibular neurons to otolith-spinal reflexes. Exp Brain Res 47:137–144Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shimazu H, Precht W (1965) Tonic and kinetic responses of cat's vestibular neurons to horizontal angular acceleration. J Neuropysiol 28:991–1013Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vidal J, Jeannerod M, Lifschitz W, Levitan H, Rosenberg J, Segundo JP (1971) Static and dynamic properties of gravitysensitive receptors in the cat vestibular system. Kybernetik 9:205–215Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wand P, Pompeiano (1979) Contribution of different size motoneurons to Renshaw cell discharge during stretch and vibration reflexes. Progr Brain Res 50:45–60Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wand P, Pompeiano O, Fayein NA (1980) The relative sensitivity of different size motoneurons to group I a volleys caused by static stretch and vibration of extensor muscles. Arch Ital Biol 118:243–269Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Windhorst U, Ptok M, Meyer-Lohmann J, Schmidt J (1978) Effects of conditioning stimulation of the contralateral n. ruber on antidromic Renshaw cell responses and monosynaptic reflexes. Pflügers Arch 373:R70Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Pompeiano
    • 1
  • P. Wand
    • 1
  • U. C. Srivastava
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Fisiologia Umana, Cattedra IUniversità di PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations