Pflügers Archiv

, Volume 377, Issue 2, pp 147–153 | Cite as

The effect of hydrolytic enzymes on the acetylcholine sensitivity of the skeletal muscle cell membrane

  • Alan Jeffrey Harborne
  • Margaret Elizabeth Smith
  • Rosemary Jones
Excitable Tissues and Central Nervous Physiology

Abstract

Isometric tension developed by rat soleus and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles in response to acetylcholine (Ach) applied in vitro was recorded. Tension of contractures elicited in response to Ach increased after muscles had been incubated with phospholipase C, pepsin, or soluble fractions prepared from muscle homogenate.

Using intracellular microelectrodes, resting membrane potential (RMP) and depolarisation in response to Ach added to the bathing medium were recorded in endplate-free regions of the muscle fibres. No significant change in RMP was observed in muscles incubated with soluble muscle fraction or phospholipase C, but depolarisation in response to Ach or carbachol was significantly increased. The time course for the increase in depolarisation and the contracture response to Ach was similar.

When all available receptors were blocked with α-bungarotoxin prior to incubation so that no response to Ach could be elicited, with subsequent incubation in muscle soluble fraction or phospholipase C, both contractures and depolarisation in response to Ach returned. These results support the hypothesis that receptors, not previously available to interact with Ach or α-bungarotoxin were revealed following incubation.

Key words

Acetylcholine receptors Skeletal muscle Muscle chemosensitivity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axelsson, J., Thesleff, S.: A study of supersensitivity in denervated mammalian skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. (Lond.)147, 178–193 (1959)Google Scholar
  2. Betz, W., Sakmann, B.: Effect of proteolytic enzymes on structure and function of frog neuromuscular junctions. J. Physiol. (Lond.)230, 673–688 (1973)Google Scholar
  3. Blunt, R., Jones, R., Vrbová, G.: Inhibition of cell division and the development of denervation hypersensitivity in skeletal muscle. Pflügers Arch.355, 189–204 (1975)Google Scholar
  4. Brockes, J. P., Hall, Z. W.: Synthesis of acetylcholine receptor by denervated rat diaphragm muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA72, 1368–1372 (1975)Google Scholar
  5. Brown, G. L.: The actions of acetylcholine on denervated mammalian and frog's muscle. J. Physiol. (Lond.)87, 438–461 (1937)Google Scholar
  6. Bunch, W., Kallsen, G., Berry, J., Edwards, C.: The effect of denervation on the incorporation of32p and [3H]glycerol by the muscle membrane. J. Neurochem.17, 613–620 (1970)Google Scholar
  7. Devreotes, P. N., Fambrough, D. M.: Acetylcholine receptor turnover in membranes of developing muscle fibers. J. Cell Biol.65, 335–358 (1975)Google Scholar
  8. Durrel, J., Garland, J. T., Friedel, R. O.: Acetylcholine action: Biochemical aspects. Science165, 826–866 (1969)Google Scholar
  9. Elmqvist, D., Thesleff, S.: A study of acetylcholine — induced contractures in denervated mammalian muscle. Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol.17, 84–93 (1960)Google Scholar
  10. Fambrough, D. M.: Acetylcholine sensitivity of muscle fibre membranes: mechanism of regulation by motoneurones. Science168, 372–373 (1970)Google Scholar
  11. Fatt, P., Katz, B.: An analysis of the endplate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J. Physiol. (Lond.)115, 2320–2370 (1951)Google Scholar
  12. Gordon, A. S., Davies, C. G., Milfay, D., Diamond, I.: Phosphorylation of acetylcholine receptor by endogenous membrane protein kinase in receptor enriched membranes ofTorpedo california. Nature267, 359–540 (1977)Google Scholar
  13. Grampp, W., Harris, J. B., Thesleff, S.: Inhibition of denervation changes in skeletal muscle by blockers of protein synthesis. J. Physiol. (Lond.)221, 743–754 (1972)Google Scholar
  14. Ikezawa, H., Yamanegi, M., Taguchi, R., Miyashita, T., Ohyabu, T.: Studies on phosphatidylinositol phosphodiesterase (phospholipase C type) of Bacillus cereus. Biochem. Biophys. Acta450, 154–164 (1976)Google Scholar
  15. Katz, B., Miledi, R.: Further observations on the distribution of acetylcholine-reactive sites in skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. (Lond.)170, 379–388 (1964)Google Scholar
  16. Lavoie, P.-A., Collier, B., Tenenhouse, A.: Comparison of α-bungarotoxin binding to skeletal muscles after inactivity or denervation. Nature260, 349–350 (1976)Google Scholar
  17. Low, M. G., Finean, J. B.: Non-lytic release of acetylcholinesterase from erythrocytes by a phosphatidylinositol specific phospholipase C. FEBS Letters82, 143–146 (1977)Google Scholar
  18. Lunt, G. G., Stefani, R., De Robertis, E.: Increased incorporation of [G-3H]lencine into a possible ‘receptor’ proteolipid in denervated muscle in vivo. J. Neurochem.18, 1545–1553 (1971)Google Scholar
  19. Miledi, R.: Junctional and extrajunctional acetylcholine receptors in skeletal muscle fibres. J. Physiol. (Lond.)151, 24–30 (1960)Google Scholar
  20. Miledi, R., Potter, L. T.: Acetylcholine receptors in muscle fibres. Nature233, 599–603 (1971)Google Scholar
  21. Pestronk, A., Drachmann, D. B., Griffin, J. W.: Effect of muscle disuse on acetylcholine receptors. Nature260, 352–353 (1976)Google Scholar
  22. Porter, C. W., Chiu, T. H., Weickowski, J., Barnard, E. A.: Types and locations of cholinergic receptor-like molecules in muscle fibres. Nature New Biol.241, 3–7 (1973)Google Scholar
  23. de Robertis, E.: Central and peripheral cholinergic receptor protein. Isolation and molecular properties. In: Neurochemistry of cholinergic recepors, pp. 63–84 (de Robertis, E., Schact, J., eds.). New York: Raven Press 1974Google Scholar
  24. Slein, W. M., Logan, G. F.: Characterisation of the phospholipases of Bacillus cereus and their effects on erythrocytes, bone and kidney cells. J. Bacteriol.90, 61–81 (1965)Google Scholar
  25. Teichberg, V. I., Sobel, A., Changeux, J. P.: In vitro phosphorylation of the acetylcholine receptor. Nature267, 540–542 (1977)Google Scholar
  26. Thesleff, S.: The mode of neuromuscular block caused by acetylcholine, nicotine, decamethonium and succinylcholine. Acta Physiol. Scand.34, 218–231 (1955)Google Scholar
  27. Watson, J. E., Gordon, T., Jones, R., Smith, M. E.: The effect of muscle extracts on the contracture response of skeletal muscle to acetylcholine. Pfügers Arch.363, 161–166 (1976)Google Scholar
  28. Weichselbaum, T. E.: An accurate and rapid method for the determination of proteins in small amounts of blood, serum and plasma. Am. J. Clin. Path.16, Techn. sect.40, 40–49 (1946)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan Jeffrey Harborne
    • 1
  • Margaret Elizabeth Smith
    • 1
  • Rosemary Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyMedical SchoolBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations