Skip to main content
Log in

Corticosteroids and neuromuscular transmission: Electrophysiological investigation of the effects of prednisolone on normal and anticholinesterase-treated neuromuscular junction

  • Excitable Tissues and Central Nervous Physiology
  • Published:
Pflügers Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of prednisolone on indirectly stimulated rat muscle twitch was investigated at normal and prostigmine-treated neuromuscular junctions. In vivo, predenisolone up to 150 mg/kg body weight did not affect twitch contraction in normal animals. In neostigmine-pretreated animals, however, doses between 12.5 and 90 mg/kg could entirely abolish the anticholinesterase-induced twitch augmentation. In vitro, prednisolone produced a depressant effect on the twitch of a normal phrenic nerve diaphragm preparation which could amount to 20%. When the preparation was pretreated with neostigmine the augmented twitch could be depressed by 10−3 to 10−6 mol/l prednisolone to levels below the untreated control. Part of this effect is owing to a suppression of the neostigmine-induced, stimulus-bound repetitive firing of the motor nerve terminals, but to explain the full effect a further inhibitory action on neuromuscular transmission must be assumed. The latter could be accounted for by a depolarizing interaction of prednisolone and neostigmine on the nerve terminals resulting in conduction block. An action of prednisolone on postsynaptic receptors could also be considered. Such effects of the glucocorticoid might contribute to the exacerbation of muscular weakness occasionally observed in patients with myasthenia gravis at the beginning of steroid therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arts, W. F., Oosterhuis, H. J.: Effect of prednisolone on neuromuscular blocking in mice in vivo. Neurology (Minneap.)25, 1088–1090 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker, T., Riker, W. F., Hall, E. D.: Effects of a single methylprednisolone dose on a facilitatory response of mammalian motor nerve. Arch. Neurol.34, 349–355 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Birnberger, K. L., Struppler, A.: Einfluß von ACTH und Cortison auf die neuromuskuläre Übertragung: Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen in vitro. In: Myasthenia Gravis (G. Hertel, H. G. Mertens, K. Ricker and K. Schimrigk, eds.). Stuttgart: Thieme-Verlag 1977

    Google Scholar 

  4. Birnberger, K. L., Rüdel, R., Struppler, A.: ACTH and neuromuscular transmission: electrophysiological in vitro investigation of the effects of corticotropin and an ACTH fragment on neuromuscular transmission. Ann. Neurol.1, 270–275 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bretag, A. H.: Synthetic interstitial fluid for isolated mammalian tissue. Life Sci.8, 319–329 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brunner, N. G., Berger, C. L., Namba, T., Grob, D.: Corticotropin and corticosteroids in generalized myasthenia gravis: comparative studies and role in management. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.274, 577–595 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hobbiger, F.: Pharmacology of anticholinesterase drugs. In: Neuromuscular junction. (E. Zaimis, ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer 1976

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hofmann, W. W.: Antimyasthenic action of corticosteroids. Arch. Neurol34, 356–360 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hubbard, J. I., Willis, W. D.: The effect of depolarization of motor nerve terminals upon the release of transmitter by nerve impulses. J. Physiol. (Lond.)194, 381–405 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hubbard, J. I., Schmidt, R. F., Yokota, T.: The effect of acetylcholine upon mammalian motor nerve terminals. J. Physiol. (Lond.)181, 810–829 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leeuwin, R. S., Wolters, E. C. M. J.: Effect of corticosteroids on sciatic nerve-tibialis anterior muscle of rats treated with hemicholinium. Neurology (Minneap.)27, 171–177 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Masland, R. L., Wigton, R. S. J.: Nerve activity accompanying fasciculation produced by prostigmine. J. Neurophysiol.3, 269–275 (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Morrison, J. D.: Repetitive activity in the phrenic nervediaphragm preparation of rat. J. Physiol. (Lond.)256, 130P (1976)

  14. Patten, B. M., Oliver, K. L., Engel, W. K.: Adverse interaction between steroid hormones and anticholinesterase drugs. Neurology (Minneap.)24, 442–449 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Randić, M., Straughan, D. W.: Antidromic activity in the rat phrenic nerve-diaphragm preparation. J. Physiol. (Lond.)173, 130–148 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Riker, W. F., Okamoto, M.: Pharmacology of motor nerve terminals. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol.9, 173–208 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Riker, W. F. Jr., Baker, T., Okamoto, M.: Glucocorticoids and mammalian motor excitability. Arch. Neurol.32, 688–695 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Van der Meer, C., Meeter, E.: The mechanism of action of anticholinesterases. The effect of diisopropylfluorophosphonate (DFP) on the isolated rat phrenic nervediaphragm preparation. Acta Physiol. Pharmacol. Neerl.4, 454–471 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Warmolts, J. R., Engel, W. K.: Remarkable benefit from alernate day prednison treatment in myasthenia gravis. Lancet1970II, 1198–1199

  20. Wilson, R. W., Ward, M. D., Johns, T. R.: Corticosteroids: a direct effect at the neuromuscular junction. Neurology (Minneap.)24, 1091–1095 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wolters, E. C. M. J., Leeuwin, R. S.: Effect of corticosteroids on the phrenic nerve-diaphragm preparation treated with hemicholinium. Neurology (Minneap.)26, 574–578 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dengler, R., Rüdel, R., Warelas, J. et al. Corticosteroids and neuromuscular transmission: Electrophysiological investigation of the effects of prednisolone on normal and anticholinesterase-treated neuromuscular junction. Pflugers Arch. 380, 145–151 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00582150

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00582150

Key words

Navigation