Advertisement

Pflügers Archiv

, Volume 405, Supplement 1, pp S121–S126 | Cite as

How big is the electrochemical potential difference of Na+ across rat renal proximal tubular cell membranes in vivo?

  • K. Yoshitomi
  • E. Frömter
Na+/H+ Exchange

Abstract

The intracellular Na+ concentration of surface loops of proximal tubules was measured with doublebarrelled Na+-sensitive microelectrodes in micropuncture experiments on rat kidneys in situ and in vivo. With the help of a fast recording system, it was possible to select only valid measurements, by discarding all records in which the Na+ concentration rose after the impalement presumably as a result of sodium ion inflow via puncture leaks. Under free-flow conditions cell Na+ activity averaged 13.1, S.D.±2.1 mmol/l which, assuming an activity coefficient of 0.75, corresponds to a Na+ concentration of 17.5 mmol/l. The simultaneously recorded cell membrane potential was −73.5 mV in agreement with best estimates derived previously. The comparison of cell sodium activity and cell pH (Yoshitomi and Frömter [17]) demonstrates that the electrochemical potential difference of Na+ is greater than that of H+, as required for the operation of Na+/H+ counter transport in the brushborder membrane but that bicarbonate efflux via the sodium bicarbonate contransport system at the peritubular cell membrane requires a HCO 3 to Na+ stoichiometry of greater than 2.0 or the involvement of other ions at least under free-flow conditions.

Key words

Rat proximal tubule Intracellular Na+ concentration Na+/H+ counter transport Na+(HCO3)2 cotransport 

References

  1. 1.
    Bello-Reuss E (1982) Electrical properties of the basolateral membrane of the straight portion of the rabbit proximal renal tubule. J Physiol 326:49–63Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beck F, Bauer R, Bauer U, Mason J, Dörge A, Rick R, Thurau K (1980) Electron microprobe analysis of intracellular elements in the rat kidney. Kidney Int 17:756–763Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck F, Dörge A, Mason J, Rick R, Thurau K (1982) Element concentration of renal and hepatic cells under potassium depletion. Kidney Int 22:250–256Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biagi B, Kubota T, Sohtell M, Giebisch G (1981) Intracellular potentials in rabbit proximal tubules perfused in vitro. Am J Physiol 240:F200–210Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boron WF, Boulpaep EL (1983) Intracellular pH regulation in the renal proximal tubule of the salamander: Basolateral HCO3-transport. J Gen Physiol 81:53–94Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burckhardt BCh, Sato K, Frömter E (1984) Electrophysiological analysis of bicarbonate permeation across the peritubular cell membrane of rat kidney proximal tubule. I. Basic observations. Pflügers Arch 401:34–42Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cassola AC, Mollenhauer M, Frömter E (1983) The intracellular chloride activity of rat kidney proximal tubular cells. Pflügers Arch 399:259–265Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edelman A, Curci S, Samarzija I, Frömter E (1978) Determination of intracellular K+ activity in rat kidney proximal tubular cells. Pflügers Arch 378:37–45Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frömter E (1982) Electrophysiological analysis of rat renal sugar and amino acid transport. I. Basic phenomena. Pflügers Arch 393:179–189Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frömter E, Müller CW, Wick T (1971) Permeability properties of the proximal tubular epithelium of the rat kidney studied with electrophysiological methods. In: Giebisch G (ed) Electrophysiology of epithelia. Schattauer, Stuttgart, pp 119–146Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gmaj P, Murer H, Kinne R (1979) Calcium ion transport across plasma membranes isolated from rat kidney cortex. Biochem J 178:549–557Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reboucas NA, Fernandes DT, Elias MM, de Mello-Aires M, Malnic G (1984) Proximal tubular HCO3, H+ and fluid transport during maleate-induced acidification defect. Pflügers Arch 401:266–271Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Samarzija I, Frömter E (1982) Electrophysiological analysis of rat renal sugar and amino acid transport. V. Acidic amino acids. Pflügers Arch 393:215–227Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Soltoff SP, Mandel LJ (1984) Active ion transport in the renal proximal tubule. II. Ionic dependence of the Na pump. J Gen Physiol 84:623–642Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Steiner RA, Oehme M, Ammann D, Simon W (1979) Neutral carrier sodium ion-selective microelectrode for intracellular studies. Anal Chem 51:351–353Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ullrich KJ, Frömter E, Baumann K (1969) Micropuncture and microanalysis in kidney physiology. In: Passow H, Stämpfli R (eds) Laboratory techniques in membrane biophysics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 106–109Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yoshitomi K, Frömter E (1984) Cell pH of rat renal proximal tubule in vivo and the conductive nature of peritubular HCO3 (OH) exit. Pflügers Arch 402:300–305Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zeuthen T, Hiam RC, Silver IA (1974) Recording of ion activities in the brain. In: Berman H, Herbert N (eds) Ion selective microelectrode. Plenum, New York, pp 145–156Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Yoshitomi
    • 1
  • E. Frömter
    • 2
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institut für BiophysikFrankfurt/Main 70
  2. 2.Zentrum der PhysiologieKlinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-UniversitätFrankfurt/Main 70Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations