Advertisement

The moon

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 346–364 | Cite as

Vitrification darkening of rock powders: implications for optical properties of the lunar surface

  • Douglas B. Nash
  • James E. Conel
Article

Abstract

Laboratory experiments show that albedoes as low as those on the Moon can be produced by vacuum vitrification and associated chemical fractionation of ordinary terrestrial basaltic material. Vitrification is established as an unequivocal process that can account for the low albedo and apparent local darkening with age of the lunar surface. The spectral reflectance curves of glass powders are significantly different than those of the parent rock mineralogy; thus, the presence of ubiquitous glass in lunar surface material complicates compositional determinations by interpretation of spectral reflectance curves. Vitrification of rocks on the Moon may highly modify the chemical composition of the resulting glass; thus, glass fragments found in lunar fines cannot be assumed to represent bulk parent rock material. Progressive impact vitrification of lunar surface material throughout the Moon's history may have led to a fine-grain, opaque, refractory-rich material we call ‘ultimate glass’. This unidentified and, at this point, hypothetical component may exist in dark regolith material; if found, it may be a useful indicator of regolith maturity.

Keywords

Lunar Surface Parent Rock Glass Powder Glass Fragment Rock Powder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, J.: 1967,J. Geophys. Res. 72, 5717–20.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, J. and Filice, A.: 1967,J. Geophys. Res. 72, 5705–15.Google Scholar
  3. Adams, J. and Jones, R.: 1970,Science 167, 737–9.Google Scholar
  4. Adams, J. and McCord, T.: 1971,Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2183–95.Google Scholar
  5. Ahrens, T. J. and O'Keefe, J. D.: 1972,The Moon 4, 214–49.Google Scholar
  6. Barber, D. J., Cowsik, R., Hutcheon, I. D., Price, P. B., and Rajan, R. S.: 1971,Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2705–14.Google Scholar
  7. Bibring, J. P., Durieu, L., Jouret, C., and Eugster, D.: 1972,Proc. Third Lunar Sci. Conf., Lunar Sci. Inst. Contrib. No. 88, pp. 71-3.Google Scholar
  8. Borg, J., Maurette, M., Durrieu, L., and Jouret, C.: 1971,Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2027–40.Google Scholar
  9. Carr, M. H. and Meyer, C. E.: 1972,Proc. Third Lunar Sci. Conf., Lunar Sci. Inst. Contrib. No. 88, pp. 116-8.Google Scholar
  10. Chao, E. C. T., Boreman, J. A., Minkin, J. A., and James, O. B.: 1970,J. Geophys. Res. 75, 7445–79.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, A. and Hapke, B.: 1968,Science 161, 1237–8.Google Scholar
  12. Conel, J. E. and Nash, D. B.: 1970,Proc. Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2013–23.Google Scholar
  13. Drever, H. I. and Johnston, R.: 1972,Meteoritics 7, 327–40.Google Scholar
  14. Englehardt, W. V., Arndt, J., and Stoffler, D.: 1972,Proc. Third Lunar Sci. Conf., Lunar Sci. Inst. Contrib. No. 88, pp. 233-5.Google Scholar
  15. Filice, A. L.: 1967,J. Geophys. Res. 72, 5221–8.Google Scholar
  16. French, B. M.: 1972,Earth Planet. Sci. Letters 13, 316–22.Google Scholar
  17. Gault, D. E. and Heitowit, E. D.: 1963,Proc. Sixth Hyperveloc. Impact Sympos. 2, 419–56.Google Scholar
  18. Glass, B. P.: 1972,Proc. Third Lunar Sci. Conf., Lunar Sci. Inst. Contrib. No. 88, pp. 312-4.Google Scholar
  19. Gold, T.: 1969,Science 165, 1345–9.Google Scholar
  20. Hapke, B.: 1966, inThe Nature of the Lunar Surface, Chap. 7, pp. 141-53, Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hapke, B.: 1968,Science 159, 76–9.Google Scholar
  22. Hapke, B., Cassidy, W., and Wells, E.: 1971, paper presented at the Apollo 12 Lunar Science Conference, Houston, Texas, January 1971.Google Scholar
  23. Hartung, J. B., Horz, F., and Gault, D.: 1972,Proc. Third Lunar Sci. Conf., Lunar Sci. Inst. Contrib. No. 88, pp. 363-5.Google Scholar
  24. Hinners, N. W.: 1971,Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 9, 447–552.Google Scholar
  25. Hinners, N. W. and El Baz, F.: 1972,Apollo 15 Preliminary Science Report, SP-289, Chap. 25, pp. 50–1, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  26. Hollister, L., Trzcienski, W., Dymer, R., Kulick, C., Weigand, P., and Hargraves, R.: 1972,Proc. Third Lunar Sci. Conf., Lunar Sci. Inst. Contrib. No. 88, pp. 386-8.Google Scholar
  27. Holt, H. E. and Rennilson, J. J.: 1968,Surveyor Project Final Report: Part II. Science Results, Technical Report 32-1265, pp. 109–13, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.Google Scholar
  28. Jakes, P., Warner, J., Ridley, W. I., Reid, A. M., Harmon, R. S., Brett, R., and Brown, R. W.: 1972Earth Planet. Sci. Letters 13, 257–71.Google Scholar
  29. Kleeman, J. D.: 1971,J. Geophys. Res. 76, 5499–503.Google Scholar
  30. Lofgren, G.: 1971,J. Geophys. Res. 76, 5635–48.Google Scholar
  31. Marshall, R.: 1961,Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 72, 1493–520.Google Scholar
  32. Nash, D. B.: 1967,J. Geophys. Res. 72, 3089–104.Google Scholar
  33. Nash, D. B., Conel, J. E., and Greer, R. T.: 1970,Science 167, 721–4.Google Scholar
  34. Shoemaker, E., Batson, E., Holt, E., Morris, E., Rennilson, J., and Whitaker, E.: 1968,J. Geophys. Res. 73, 3989–4044.Google Scholar
  35. Sonett, C. P., Schubert, G., Smith, B., Schwartz, K., and Colburn, D.: 1971,Proc. Second Lunar Sci. Conf. 3, 2415–31.Google Scholar
  36. Stoffler, D. and Hornemann, V.: 1972,Meteoritics 7, 371–94.Google Scholar
  37. Wood, J., Marvin, V., Reid, J., Taylor, G., Bower, J., Powell, B., and Dickey, J.: 1971,Mineralogy and Petrology of the Apollo 12 Lunar Sample, Special Report 333, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas B. Nash
    • 1
  • James E. Conel
    • 1
  1. 1.Space Sciences Division, Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations