Advertisement

Pflügers Archiv

, Volume 407, Issue 2, pp 134–141 | Cite as

Transmitter release from nerve terminals evoked by depolarization pulses contains a short phase of repression

  • J. Dudel
Excitable Tissues and Central Nervous Physiology

Abstract

The time course of quantal transmitter release after a depolarization pulse was measured at frog and crayfish motor nerve terminals. Test pulses were arranged to elicit low release, and the delay of first releases and the median of distributions of release times were defined for large (>2000 stimuli) samples. Small, subthreshold depolarizing postpulses were added directly after the test pulses. Such postpulses of 1 to 4 ms duration prolonged the delay of first releases and shifted the median of the time course of release by up to 3 ms (at 0°C) depending on the duration and on the amplitude of the post-pulses. These ‘latency shifts’, which have been observed after prolonged depolarizations by other authors, were statistically highly significant. The results of post-pulses were very similar at neuromuscular junctions of frog and crayfish. It is concluded that depolarization in addition to the promotion of release has a short repressing action on release which is partly responsible for synaptic delay.

Key words

Synaptic transmitter release Neuromuscular junction Synaptic delay Latency shift 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Benoit PR, Mambrini J (1970) Modification of transmitter release by ions which prolong the presynaptic action potential. J Physiol (Lond) 210:681–695Google Scholar
  2. Datyner NB, Gage PW (1980) Phasic secretion of acetylcholine at a mammalian neuromuscular junction. J Physiol (Lond) 303:299–314Google Scholar
  3. Datyner NB, Gage PW (1982) Secretion of acetylcholine in response to graded depolarization of motor nerve terminals. J Physiol (Paris) 78:412–416Google Scholar
  4. Dudel J (1981) The effect of reduced calcium on quantal unit current and release at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. Pflügers Arch 391:35–40Google Scholar
  5. Dudel J (1983) Graded or all-or-nothing release of transmitter quanta by local depolarizations of nerve terminals on crayfish muscle. Pflügers Arch 398:155–164Google Scholar
  6. Dudel J (1984a) Control of quantal transmitter release at frog's motor nerve terminals. I. Dependence on amplitude and duration of depolarization. Pflügers Arch 402:225–234Google Scholar
  7. Dudel J (1984b) Control of quantal transmitter release at frog's motor nerve terminals. II. Modulation by de- or hyperpolarizing pulses. Pflügers Arch 402:235–243Google Scholar
  8. Dudel J (1985a) Depolarization triggers, but also delays quantal transmitter release at motor nerve terminals in crayfish and frog. Pflügers Arch 403 (Suppl):R46Google Scholar
  9. Dudel J (1985b) Delay of synaptic release following depolarization of the terminal. Neurosci Lett [Suppl] 22:232Google Scholar
  10. Dudel J (1986) Dependence of double-pulse facilitation on amplitude and duration of the depolarization pulses at frog's motor nerve terminals. Pflügers Arch 406:449–457Google Scholar
  11. Dudel J, Parnas I, Parnas H (1983) Neurotransmitter release and its facilitation in crayfish muscle. VI. Release determined by both, intracellular calcium concentration and depolarization of the nerve terminal. Pflügers Arch 399:1–10Google Scholar
  12. Katz B, Miledi R (1965a) The measurement of synaptic delay, and the time course of acetylcholine-release at the neuromuscular junction. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 161:483–495Google Scholar
  13. Katz B, Miledi R (1965b) The effect of temperature on the synaptic delay at the neuromuscular junction. J Physiol (Lond) 181:656–670Google Scholar
  14. Katz B, Miledi R (1967a) The release of acetylcholine from nerve endings by graded electric pulses. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 167:23–38Google Scholar
  15. Katz B, Miledi R (1967b) A study of synaptic transmission in the absence of nerve impulses. J Physiol (Lond) 192:407–436Google Scholar
  16. Katz B, Miledi R (1977) Suppression of transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 196:465–469Google Scholar
  17. Llinás R, Steinberg I, Walton K (1981) Relationship between presynaptic calcium current and postsynaptic potential in squid giant synapse. Biophys J 33:323–352Google Scholar
  18. Parnas H, Parnas I, Dudel J (1985) On the voltage dependence of neurotransmitter release. In: Katz B, Rahamimoff R (eds) Calcium, neuronal function and transmitter release. Martinus Nihoff, BostonGoogle Scholar
  19. Parnas H, Dudel J, Parnas I (1986b) Neurotransmitter release and its facilitation in crayfish. VII. Another voltage dependent process beside Ca entry controls the time course of phasic release. Pflügers Arch 406:121–130Google Scholar
  20. Parnas H, Parnas I, Segel L (1986c) A new method for determining cooperativity in neurotransmitter release. J. Theor Biol (in press)Google Scholar
  21. Parnas I, Parnas H, Dudel J (1986) VIII. Modulation of release by hyperpolarizing pulses. Pflügers Arch 406:131–137Google Scholar
  22. Smith J, Augustine G, Charlton P (1985) Transmission at voltageclamped giant synapse of the squid: evidence for cooperativity of presynaptic calcium action. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:622–625Google Scholar
  23. Stockbridge N, Moore J (1984) Dynamics of intracellular calcium and its possible relationship to phasic transmitter release and facilitation at the frog neuromusculatur junction. J Neurosci 4:803–811Google Scholar
  24. Zucker R, Stockbridge N (1983) Presynaptic calcium diffusion and the time courses of transmitter release and synaptic facilitation at the squid giant synapse. J Neurosci 3:1263–1269Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Dudel
    • 1
  1. 1.Physiologisches Institut der Technischen Universität MünchenMünchen 40Federal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations