Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 505–509 | Cite as

The relationship of microstructure to mechanical properties of Al-, Si-, K-doped tungsten wire

  • J. L. Walter
  • E. F. Koch


Tungsten wire, commercially doped with aluminium, silicon, and potassium, was obtained from six different manufacturers with a diameter of 0.0063 cm. The tensile strength at 1620 °C, a measurement of the quality of the wire used by the General Electric Company, was determined and found to be different for each wire. Additional samples of wire were annealed at 1620 °C under the same conditions employed for the tensile test. To determine the microstructure, these samples were thinned for transmission electron microscopy along with the wires in the as-drawn condition. The widths of from 75 to 125 subgrains were measured for each sample. In addition, in the annealed samples, the spacing of the strings of potassium bubbles was also determined. It was found that the 1620 °C tensile strength was related to the increase in width of the subgrains during the 1620 °C anneal and that the amount of subgrain widening was determined by the spacing of the strings of bubbles. Hence, the 1620 °C tensile strength was related to the bubble string spacing; the closer together were the strings, the higher was the 1620 °C tensile strength. It was also shown that the grain morphology of the wire, as measured by the stretch or “sag” of a filament during a stress test, is also determined by the spacing of the strings of potassium bubbles.


Polymer Silicon Microstructure Potassium Transmission Electron Microscopy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. L. Walter andK. A. Lou,J. Mater. Sci. 24 (1989) 3577.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. L. Briant andJ. L. Walter, in “Proceedings of the 12th Plansee Seminar”, Vol. 1, edited by H. Bildstein and H. M. Ortner, (Metallwerk Plansee GMBH, Reuth, Tirol, Austria, 1989) p. 151.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. L. Walter, K. A. Lou andM. R. Vukcevich,ibid., p. 493.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. M. Moon, R. Stickler andA. L. Wolfe, in “Proceedings of the 6th Plansee Seminar”, (Springer-Verlag, 1968) p. 67.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. B. Snow,Met. Trans. 7A (1976) 783.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. L. Walter,Trans. TMS-AIME 239 (1967) 272.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. L. Briant andJ. L. Walter,Acta Metall. 36 (1988) 2503.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. R. Kehman, W. D. Wilkinson andF. L. Yagge, Argonne National Laboratory, Report (ANL-4417) (1950).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Walter
    • 1
  • E. F. Koch
    • 1
  1. 1.General Electric Corporate Research and DevelopmentSchenectadyUSA

Personalised recommendations