Journal of Population Economics

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 415–428 | Cite as

Fertility, growth and the financing of public education and health

  • Theodore Palivos
  • Carol A. Scotese
Article

Abstract

This paper considers the implications of the financing of government services to children when fertility decisions are endogenously determined. In particular, it is shown that when the services are financed by taxation, the equilibrium outcome is biased away from the socially preferred result. The bias results in higher fertility rates and lower economic growth rates than the efficient social optimum. This arises because each household internalizes the benefits, but not the costs of the tax-financed services. We consider alternative methods of financing the public provision of services and find that a combination of taxation and vouchers can eliminate the bias in the equilibrium outcome.

JEL classification

H42 J 13 O 11 

Key words

Fertility growth public education and health 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arrow K (1971) A utilitarian approach to the concept of equality in public expenditures.Quarterly Journal of Economics 86:409–415Google Scholar
  2. Barro RJ, Becker GS (1989) Fertility choice in a model of economic growth.Econometrica 57:481–501Google Scholar
  3. Becker GS (1988) Family economics and macro behavior.American Economic Review 78:1–13Google Scholar
  4. Becker GS, Lewis HG (1973) On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children.Journal of Political Economy 81:5279–288Google Scholar
  5. Becker GS, Murphy KM, Tamura R (1990) Human capital, fertility, and economic growth.Journal of Political Economy 98:S12-S37Google Scholar
  6. Besley T, Coate S (1991) Public provision of private goods and the redistribution of income.American Economic Review 81:979–984Google Scholar
  7. Boadway R, Marchand M (1995) The use of public expenditures for redistributive purposes.Oxford Economic Papers 47:45–59Google Scholar
  8. Brander JA, Dowrick S (1994) The role of fertility and population in economic growth: Empirical results from aggregate cross-national data.Journal of Population Economics 8:1–25Google Scholar
  9. Cigno A (1993) Intergenerational transfer without altruism: Family, market and state.European Journal of Political Economy 98:505–518Google Scholar
  10. Eichenbaum M, Hansen LP, Singleton KJ (1988) A time series analysis of representative agent models of consumption and leisure choice under uncertainty.Quarterly Journal of Economics 103:51–78Google Scholar
  11. Feenstra RC (1986) Functional equivalence between liquidity costs and the utility of money.Journal of Monetary Economics 17:271–291Google Scholar
  12. Glomm G, Ravikumar B (1992) Public versus private investment in human capital: Endogenous growth and income inequality.Journal of Political Economy 100:818–834Google Scholar
  13. King RG, Plosser CI, Rebelo ST (1988) Production, growth and business cycles.Journal of Monetary Economics 21:195–232Google Scholar
  14. Kuznets S (1960) Population change and aggregate output. In:Demographic and economic change in developed countries. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  15. Mankiw NG, Rotemberg IT, Summers LH (1985) Intertemporal substitution in macroeconomics.Quarterly Journal of Economics 100:225–251Google Scholar
  16. Nerlove M (1974) Household and economy: Toward a new theory of population and economic growth.Journal of Political Economy 82:S200–218Google Scholar
  17. Palivos T (1995) Endogenous fertility, multiple growth paths and economic convergence.Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 19:1489–1510Google Scholar
  18. Palivos T, Wang P, Zhang J (1997) On the existence of balanced growth equilibrium.International Economic Review(forthcoming, Vol 37)Google Scholar
  19. Palivos T, Yip C (1993) Optimal population size and endogenous growth.Economics Letters 41:107–110Google Scholar
  20. Ploeg F van der, Alogoskoufis GS (1994) Money and endogenous growth.Journal of Money Credit and Banking 26:771–791Google Scholar
  21. Poterba JM (1994) Government intervention in the markets for education and health care: How and why?NBER Working Paper No. 4916, November 1994Google Scholar
  22. Razin A, Ben-Zion U (1975) An intergenerational model of population growth.American Economic Review 65:923–933Google Scholar
  23. Rebelo S (1991) Long-run policy analysis and long-run growth.Journal of Political Economy 99:500–521Google Scholar
  24. Scotese C, Wang P (1995) Can government enforcement permanently alter fertility? The case of China.Economic Inquiry 33:552–570Google Scholar
  25. Simon J (1977)The economics of population growth. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  26. Simon J (1981)The ultimate resource. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  27. Tobin J (1970) On limiting the domain of inequality.Journal of Law and Economics 13:263–277Google Scholar
  28. Wang P, Yip C, Scotese C (1994) Fertility choice and economic growth: Theory and evidence.Review of Economics and Statistics 76:255–266Google Scholar
  29. Usher D (1977) The Welfare economics of the socialization of commodities.Journal of Public Economics 40:151–168Google Scholar
  30. World Bank (1984)World development report 1984. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Theodore Palivos
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carol A. Scotese
    • 1
  1. 1.Tilburg UniversityThe Netherlands
  2. 2.EconomicsLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations