Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Overdistraction: a hazard of skull traction in the management of acute injuries of the cervical spine

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In acute cervical spine trauma, skull traction is used to reduce a dislocation or fracture dislocation, to immobilize an unstable lesion until definitive treatment (operative or conservative) is possible or, more rarely, as a definitive treatment until healing occurs. This method may be dangerous when an unstable lesion is accidentally overdistracted. A few cases have been reported in the literature, some with neurological complications. We report five cases in which overdistraction was seen. Two hangman's fractures were overdistracted. One of the two patients developed a Cheyne-Stokes breathing pattern during traction which resolved after the weight was reduced. Furthermore, two hyperextension/distraction injuries (C4/5 and C6/7) and one bilateral C5/6 fracture dislocation were overdistracted without neurological deterioration. Occipitocervical dislocations, fractures of the odontoid process, hangman's fractures, hyperextension/distraction injuries and bilateral dislocations or fracture dislocations may present disruption of both the anterior and posterior elements. Therefore, these injuries are specially vulnerable to overdistraction when skull traction is used. To prevent accidental overdistraction during skull traction, we recommend the use of less weight than is generally proposed in the literature. To reduce a dislocation, we start traction weight at 2 kg and slowly increase it under continuous neurological and radiological monitoring until reduction is completed. Traction of 5–7 kg is usually sufficient; however, heavier traction may occasionally be necessary. After reduction is completed, traction is reduced to 2 kg. This weight is sufficient to immobilize a lesion until definitive treatment is possible. Inadvertent rotation may be prevented by placing sandbags on both sides of the head.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amyes EW, Anderson FM (1956) Fracture of the odontoid process. Report of sixty-three cases. AMA Arch Surg 72:377–393

    Google Scholar 

  2. Braakman R, Penning L (1971) Injuries of the cervical spine. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, p 177

    Google Scholar 

  3. Breig A (1978) Adverse mechanical tension in the central nervous system. An analysis of cause and effect. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cornish BL (1968) Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 50:31–43

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crutchfield WG (1954) Skeletal traction in the treatment of injuries to the cervical spine. JAMA 155:129

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edgar MA, Fisher TR, McSweeney T, Park WM (1972) Tetraplegia from Hangman's fracture: report of a case with recovery. Injury 3:199–202

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fraunhoffer M (1986) Querschnittsyndrom nach Extension einer Halswirbelsäulenluxation über eine Crutchfield-Klammer. Aktuel Traumatol 16:164–166

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jeffreys E (1980) Disorders of the cervical spine. Butterworths, London, p 60

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lind B, Sihlbom H, Nordwall A (1988) Halo-vest treatment of unstable cervical spine injuries. Spine 13:425–432

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miller LS, Coder HB, De Lucia FA, Cotler JM, Hume EL (1987) Biomechanical analysis of cervical distraction. Spine 12:831–837

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reece AT, Todd NV (1988) Brain abscess complicating cervical traction. Br Med J 297:539

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rockwood CA, Green DP (1984) Fractures in adults, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, p 1006

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rothman RH, Simeone FA (1975) The spine, vol 1. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 94

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ryan MD, Taylor TKF (1982) Odontoid fractures. A rational approach to treatment. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 64:416–421

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schneider RC, Livingston KE, Cave AJE, Hamilton G (1965) “Hangman's fracture” of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg 22:141–154

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stolke D, Weidner A, Galanski M (1982) Hirnabszess als Komplikation bei Extensionsbehandlung nach Halswirbelsäulenverletzungen. Aktuel Traumatol 12:153–154

    Google Scholar 

  17. White AA, Panjabi MM (1978) Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 142, 227 and 443–444

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeanneret, B., Magerl, F. & Ward, J.C. Overdistraction: a hazard of skull traction in the management of acute injuries of the cervical spine. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 110, 242–245 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00572880

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00572880

Keywords

Navigation