Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 105–140 | Cite as

The periodicity of daily activity and its seasonal changes in free-ranging and captive kangaroo rats

  • G. J. Kenagy
Article

Summary

Populations ofDipodomys microps andD. merriami in eastern California (37°11′N. Lat.) are active on the surface throughout the night and during the whole year. These two species, and the males and females within each species, show no significant differences in times of beginning or end of activity. Beginning and end of nightly activity generally fall within the brighter part of the twilights, even though the total time spent on the surface by individuals is at times only an hour or two, or even less, per night. Near the summer solstice in southern Saskatchewan, Canada (50°45′N. Lat.), when sunset and sunrise were 7 h 43 min apart, the time from onset to end of activity in a population ofD. ordii (the northernmost of all kangaroo rats) was only 6 h; these animals were also only on the surface at intervals during the night.

During the course of the year, the light intensity at which the first individualD. microps andD. merriami became active on the surface varied between 200 and 2,000 lux, and the light intensity at which the last individual was active in the morning varied between 50 and 20,000 lux. There was no apparent influence of the moonlight cycle upon the onset and end of activity; in fact the light levels at beginning and end of activity are about 2 to 4 orders of magnitude brighter than that at full moon. The onset of activity is fairly synchronous within the population in that most individuals surface within about a fhalf hour of each other; furthermore, two-thirds of the individuals appearing in the first 32 min of activity had already appeared within the first 12 min. There appears to be a similar, synchronous, but less well marked end of activity in the morning.

There were systematic seasonal changes in the time relative to sunset and sunrise respectively, and in the corresponding light intensities, at which the animals began and ended activity. The phase relationship between the onset of activity and sunset (ψonset) showed tow maxima and two minima per year, but the phase relationship between the end of activity and sunrise (ψend) showed only one maximum and one minimum per year. On the other hand, the annual range of change in the evening phaseψonset (28 min) was half the annual range of change in the morning phaeψend (57 min). Such a conspicuous difference in frequency and amplitude ofψonset andψend has not previously been reported for any species, nor has it been predicted by models of circadian rhythms and phase relationships. The resemblance of the course of annual change inψonset to annual change in length of twilight and the resemblance of annual change inψend to change in length of night are discussed. These differences may underline a circadian system based on two separate, but normally coupled components, which could be separately synchronized by dusk and dawn respectively.

The daily running-wheel activity of 10 individually housedD. merriami under natural skylight in Los Angeles (34°05′N. Lat.) began and ended at light intensities two to three orders of magnitude lower than corresponding values for surface activity in the field. The onset and end of activity for the captive population did not show the synchronous peaks typical of the field populations; nor did the nightly activity patterns of individuals show peaks at the beginning and end of the night. The social isolation of the captive kangaroo rats is suggested as a factor contributing to differences between activity parameters in captivity and field.

Proximate and ultimate factors shaping the periodicity of activity in kangaroo rats are discussed. It is hypothesized that social interactions involving some form of territoriality may give rise to a population peak in onset of activity in some solitary mammals such as kangaroo rats. A set of criteria is presented for comparing vertebrate species with regard to the periodicity and synchronization of both daily and seasonal functions.

Keywords

Phase Relationship Annual Change Full Moon Captive Population Circadian System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aschoff, J.: Exogenous and endogenous components in circadian rhytms. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol.25, 11–28 (1960)Google Scholar
  2. Aschoff, J.: Die Tagesperiodik licht- und dunkel-aktiver Tiere. Rev. suisse Zool.71, 528–558 (1964)Google Scholar
  3. Aschoff, J.: Circadian clocks (Aschoff, J., ed.), pp. 479. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1965aGoogle Scholar
  4. Aschoff, J.: Response curves in circadian periodicity. In: Circadian clocks (Aschoff, J., ed.), pp. 95–111. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1965bGoogle Scholar
  5. Aschoff, J.: Circadian activity pattern with two peaks. Ecol.47, 657–662 (1966)Google Scholar
  6. Aschoff, J.: Phasenlage der Tagesperiodik in Abhängigkeit von Jahreszeit und Breitengrad. Oecologia (Berl.)3, 125–165 (1969)Google Scholar
  7. Aschoff, J., Daan, S., Figala, J., Müller, K.: Precision of entrained circadian activity rhythms under natural photoperiodic conditions. Naturwissenschaften59, 276–277 (1972)Google Scholar
  8. Aschoff, J., Gerecke, U., Kureck, A., Pohl, H., Rieger, P., Saint Paul, U.v., Wever, R.: Interdependent parameters of circadian activity rhythms in birds and man, pp. 3–29. In: Biochronometry (Menaker, M., ed.). Washington, D.C.: Nat. Acad. Sci. 1971Google Scholar
  9. Aschoff, J., Klotter, K., Wever, R.: Circadian vocabulary. In: Circadian clocks (Aschoff, J. ed.). Amsterdam: North-Holland 1965Google Scholar
  10. Aschoff, J., Wever, R.: Über Phasenbeziehungen zwischen biologischer Tagesperiodik und Zeitgeberperiodik. Z. vergl. Physiol.46, 115–128 (1962a)Google Scholar
  11. Aschoff, J., Wever, R.: Beginn und Ende der täglichen Aktivität freilebender Vögel. J. Orn.103, 2–27 (1962b)Google Scholar
  12. Chandrashekaran, M.K.: Studies on phase-shifts in endogenous rhythms. II. The dual effect of light on the entrainment of the eclosion rhythm inDrosophila pseudoobscura. Z. vergl. Physiol.56, 163–170 (1967)Google Scholar
  13. Childs, H.E.: The kangaroo rat preyed upon by the sparrow hawk. J. Mammal.33, 493–494 (1952)Google Scholar
  14. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., Vol. 25, 524 pp. (1960)Google Scholar
  15. Daan, S., Aschoff, J.: Circadian rhythms of locomotor activity in captive birds and mammals: their variations with season and latitude. Oecologia (Berl.)18, 269–316 (1975)Google Scholar
  16. Danilevsky, A.S., Goryshin, N.I., Tyshchenko, V.P.: Biological rhythms in terrestrial arthropods. Ann. Rev. Entom.15, 201–244 (1970)Google Scholar
  17. Engelmann, W.: Effect of light and dark pulses on the emergence rhythm ofDrosophila pseudoobscura. Experientia (Basel)22, 606–608 (1966)Google Scholar
  18. Engländer, H., Laufens, G.: Aktivitätsuntersuchungen bei Fransenfledermäusen (Myotis nattereri, Kuhl 1918). Experientia (Basel)24, 618–619 (1968)Google Scholar
  19. Erkinaro, E.: Der Phasenwechsel der lokomotorischen Aktivität beiMicrotus agrestis (L.),M. arvalis (Pall.) undM. oeconomus (Pall.). Aquilo, Ser. Zool.8, 3–31 (1969)Google Scholar
  20. Fitch, H.S.: Habits and economic relationships of the Tulare kangaroo rat. J. Mammal.29, 5–35 (1948)Google Scholar
  21. Graefe, G.: Die Aktivitätsperiodik des Flughörnchens,Glaucomys volans (Linnaeus 1758) und des Backenhörnchens,Tamias striatus (Linnaeus 1758). Z. Tierpsychol.18, 84–90 (1961)Google Scholar
  22. Gwinner, E.: Testosterone induces “splitting” of circadian locomotor activity rhythms in birds. Science185, 72–74 (1974)Google Scholar
  23. Hall, E.R., Kelson, K.R.: The mammals of North America, Vol. I. New York: Ronald 1959Google Scholar
  24. Hamner, K.C., Hoshizaki, T.: Multiplicity of biological clocks, pp. 671–675. In: Chronobiology (Scheving, L.E., Halberg, F., Pauly, J.E., eds.). Tokyo: Igaku Shoin 1974aGoogle Scholar
  25. Hamner, K.C., Hoshizaki, T.: Photoperiodism and circadian rhythms: an hypothesis. Bioscience24, 407–417 (1974b)Google Scholar
  26. Hoffmann, K.: Die relative Wirksamkeit von Zeitgebern. Oecologia (Berl.)3, 184–206 (1969)Google Scholar
  27. Hoffmann, K.: Splitting of the circadian rhythm as a function of light intensity, pp. 134–151. In: Biochronometry (Menaker, M., ed.). Washington, D.C.: Nat. Acad. Sci. 1971Google Scholar
  28. Kavanau, J.L.: Twilight transitions and biological rhythmicity. Nature (Lond.)194, 1293–1295 (1962)Google Scholar
  29. Kenagy, G.J.: Daily and seasonal patterns of activity and energetics in a heteromyid rodent community. Ecology54, 1201–1219 (1973a)Google Scholar
  30. Kenagy, G.J.: Adaptations for leaf eating in the Great Basin kangaroo rat,Dipodomys microps. Oecologia (Berl.)12, 383–412 (1973b)Google Scholar
  31. Kenagy, G.J.: Male fighting, drumming, and copulation of the kangaroo ratDipodomys microps observed in the field. J. Mammal.57 (in press, 1976)Google Scholar
  32. Laufens, G.: Beginn und Ende der täglichen Aktivität freilebender Haselmäuse (Muscardinus avellanarius L.) und Siebenschläfer (Glis glis L.). Z. Säugetierk.40, 74–89 (1975)Google Scholar
  33. Lockard, R.B., Owings, D.H.: Seasonal variation in moonlight avoidance by bannertail kangaroo rats. J. Mammal.55, 189–193 (1974a)Google Scholar
  34. Lockard, R.B., Owings, D.H.: Moon-related surface activity of bannertail (Dipodomys spectabilis) and Fresno (D. nitratoides) kangaroo rats. Anim. Behav.22, 263–274 (1974b)Google Scholar
  35. Menaker, M. (ed.): Biochronometry, 662 pp. Washington, D.C.: Nat. Acad. Sci. 1971Google Scholar
  36. Menaker, M.: Aspects of the physiology of circadian rhythmicity in the vertebrate central nervous system, pp. 479–489. In: The neurosciences: Third study program (Schmitt, F.A., ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press 1974Google Scholar
  37. Nero, R.W., Fyfe, R.W.: Kangaroo rat colonies found. Blue Jay14, 107–110 (1956)Google Scholar
  38. Pearson, O.P.: Habits of harvest mice revealed by automatic photographic recorders. J. Mammal.41, 58–74 (1960)Google Scholar
  39. Pittendrigh, C.S.: Circadian rhythms and the circadian organization of living systems. Col. Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol.25, 159–184 (1960)Google Scholar
  40. Pittendrigh, C.S.: Circadian oscillations in cells and the circadian organization of multicellular systems, pp. 437–458. In: The neurosciences: Third study program (Schmitt, F.A., ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press 1974Google Scholar
  41. Pohl, H.: Die Aktivitätsperiodik von zwei tagaktiven Nagern,Funambulus palmarum undEutamias sibiricus, unter Dauerlichtbedingungen. J. comp. Physiol.78, 60–74 (1972)Google Scholar
  42. Saunders, D.S.: Evidence for “dawn” and “dusk” oscillators in theNasonia photoperiodic clock. J. Insect Physiol.20, 77–88 (1974)Google Scholar
  43. Stendell, R.C., Myers, P.: White-tailed kite predation on a fluctuating vole population. Condor75, 360–361 (1973)Google Scholar
  44. Tappe, D.T.: Natural history of the Tulare kangaroo rat. J. Mammal.22, 117–148 (1941)Google Scholar
  45. Twente, J.W.: Some aspects of habitat selection and other behavior of cavern-dwelling bats. Ecology36, 706–732 (1955)Google Scholar
  46. Tyshchenko, V.P.: Two-oscillatory model of the physiological mechanism of insect photoperiodic reaction. Zhur. obshch. Biol.27, 209–222 (1966)Google Scholar
  47. Voûte, A.M., Sluiter, J.W., Grimm, M.P.: The influence of the natural light-dark cycle on the activity rhythm of pond bats (Myotis dasycneme Boie, 1825) during summer. Oecologia (Berl.)17, 221–243 (1974)Google Scholar
  48. Wever, R.: A mathematical model for circadian rhythms, pp. 47–63. In: Circadian clocks (Aschoff, J., ed.). Amsterdam: North-Holland 1965Google Scholar
  49. Wever, R.: Zum Einfluß der Dämmerung auf die circadiane Periodik. Z. vergl. Physiol.55, 255–277 (1967)Google Scholar
  50. Ziesenis, J.S., Davis, D.E., Smith, D.E.: Diel variations in the aggressive behaviour of the mouse,Mus musculus. Anim. Behav.23, 941–948 (1975)Google Scholar
  51. Zwahlen, R.: Die lokomotorische Aktivität des Eichhörnchens (Sciurus vulgaris). Oecologia (Berl.)22, 79–98 (1975)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. J. Kenagy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations