, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 159–163 | Cite as

Solar tracking response to drought in a desert annual

  • I. Forseth
  • J. R. Ehleringer


The responses to drought of the solar tracking winter annualLupinus arizonicus (Wats.) were examined under field and laboratory growth regimes. Under drought conditions tracking movements were maintained until the plant reached the wilting point. The leaves and leaflets were observed to cup in response to decreases in the xylem water potential. This resulted in a negative, but linear relationship between the cosine of the angle of incidence of the direct solar beam upon the leaf and water potential. Leaf conductance was also significantly related to xylem water potential in natural populations. Leaf and leaflet cupping seem to be responding directly to changing plant water status, resulting in reduced solar radiation load to drought stressed plants. It is hypothesized that this property may have adaptive consequences in relation to the water relations, energy budget, and carbon balance of the plant.


Water Potential Drought Condition Energy Budget Carbon Balance Wilt Point 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Armond, P.A., Mooney, H.A.: Correlation of photosynthetic unit size and density with photosynthetic capacity. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yb.77, 234–237 (1978)Google Scholar
  2. Beardsell, M.F., Jarvis, P.G., Davidson, B.: A null-balance diffusion porometer suitable for use with leaves of many shapes. J. Appl. Ecol.9, 677–690 (1972)Google Scholar
  3. Begg, J.E., Torssell, B.W.R.: Diaphotonastic and parahelionastic leaf movements inStylosanthes humilus H.B.K. (Townsville Stylo). Royal Society of New Zealand Bull.12, 277–283 (1974)Google Scholar
  4. Björkman, O., Boardman, N.K., Anderson, S.M., Thorne, S.W., Goodchild, O.S., Pyliotis, N.A.: Effect of light intensity during growth ofAtriplex patula on the capacity of photosynthetic reactions, chloroplast components and structure. Carnegie Inst. Washington Yearb.71, 115–135 (1972)Google Scholar
  5. Darwin, C.: The Power of Movement in Plants. London: William Clowes and Sons, Limited 1880Google Scholar
  6. Gates, D.M.: Energy, plants and ecology. Ecology46, 1–13 (1965)Google Scholar
  7. Hsiao, T.C.: Plant responses to water stress. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.24, 519–570 (1973)Google Scholar
  8. Jones, L.W., Kok, B.: Photoinhibition of chloroplast reactions. I. Kinetics and action spectra. Plant Physiol.41, 1037–1043 (1966a)Google Scholar
  9. Jones, L.W., Kok, B.: Photoinhibition of chloroplast reactions. II. Multiple effects. Plant Physiol.41, 1044–1049 (1966b)Google Scholar
  10. Lang, A.R.G.: Leaf orientation of a cotton plant. Agric. Meteorol.11, 37–51 (1973)Google Scholar
  11. Mooney, H.A., Ehleringer, J., Berry, J.A.: High photosynthetic capacity of a winter annual in Death Valley. Science194, 322–324 (1976)Google Scholar
  12. Mooney, H.A., Ehleringer, J.R.: The carbon gain benefits of solar tracking in a desert annual. Plant Cell Env.1, 307–311 (1978)Google Scholar
  13. Munz, P.A.: A Flora of Southern California. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press (1974)Google Scholar
  14. Schwartz, A., Koller, D.: Phototropic response to vectorial light in leaves ofLavatera cretica L. Plant Physiol.61, 924–928 (1978)Google Scholar
  15. Scott, D., Wells, J.S.: Leaf orientation in barley, lupin, and lucerne stands. New Zealand J. Bot.7, 372–388 (1969)Google Scholar
  16. Shell, G.S.G., Lang, A.R.G., Sale, P.J.M.: Quantitative measures of leaf orientation and heliotropic response in sunflower, bean, pepper and cucumber. Agric. Meteorol.13, 25–37 (1974)Google Scholar
  17. Shell, G.S.G., Lang, A.R.G.: Movements of sunflower leaves over a 24-h period. Agric. Meteorol.16, 161–170 (1976)Google Scholar
  18. Slatyer, R.O.: Effects of short periods of water stress on leaf photosynthesis. In: Plant Response to Climatic Factors. (R.O. Slayter, ed.), pp. 271–276. Paris: UNESCO 1973Google Scholar
  19. Van Overbeek, J.: Phototropism. Bot. Rev.5, 655–681 (1939)Google Scholar
  20. Wainwright, C.M.: Sun-tracking and related leaf movements in a desert lupine (Lupinus arizonicus). Amer. J. Bot.64, 1032–1041 (1977)Google Scholar
  21. Yin, H.C.: Diaphototropic movement of the leaves ofMalva neglecta. Amer. J. Bot.25, 1–6 (1938)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Forseth
    • 1
  • J. R. Ehleringer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations