Abstract
To develop a proper protocol for biological exposure monitoring of acetone, we evaluated whether exposure to acetone on the previous day affects the biological monitoring value at the end of a work day. One hundred and ten male workers exposed to acetone in three acetate fiber manufacturing plants were monitored using a liquid passive sampler on two consecutive working days after 2 days without exposure. Urine samples were collected at the start of the workshift and the end of the shift on both days for each subject. For ten exposed workers urine samples were collected approximately every 2 h during and after the first working day until the following morning. Acetone concentrations in urine (Cu) at the start of the first working day were 1.3 ± 2.4 (range: ND-14.1) mg/l in nonexposed workers and 2.4 ± 5.6 (range: ND-40.3) mg/l in exposed workers. The urinary acetone concentration at the beginning of the second working day indicated that urinary levels of acetone do not decline to background level by the following morning when exposure concentration exceeds 300 ppm. However, linear regression analysis demonstrated that the relationship between environmental exposure level and urine level was similar on the 1st day and the 2nd day. Thus, although urine acetone levels did not return completely to baseline after high exposures, under the present exposure levels the exposure on the previous day did not significantly affect urinary acetone at the end of the workshift of the next day.
References
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (1991) Documentations of the threshold limit values and biological exposure indices, 6th ed ACGIH, Cincinnati
De Rosa E, Cellini M, Sassa G et al. (1993). Biological monitoring of workers exposed to styrene and acetone. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 65: S107-S110
DiVincenzo GD, Yanno FJ, Atill BD (1973) Exposure of man and dog to low concentrations of acetone vapor. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 34: 329–336
Fujino A, Satoh T, Takebayashi T, et al. (1992) Biological monitoring of workers exposed to acetone in acetate fibre plants. Br J Ind Med 49: 654–657
Kawai T, Yasugi T, Uchida Y, et al. (1990) Urinary excretion of unmetabolized acetone as an indicator of occupational exposure to acetone. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 62: 165–170
Kawai T, Yasugi T, Uchida Y, et al. (1991) A personal diffusive sampler for occupational acetone vapor exposure monitoring. Toxicol Lett 55: 295–302
Matsushita T, Yoshimune A, Inoue T, et al. (1969a) Experimental studies for determining the MAC value of acetone. 1. Biological reaction in the “one-day exposure” to acetone (in Japanese). Sangyo lgaku 11: 477–484
Matsushita T, Goshima E, Miyagaki H, et al. (1969b) Experimental studies for determining the MAC value of acetone. 2. Biological reaction in the “six-day exposure” to acetone (in Japanese). Sangyo Igaku 11: 507–511
Monster AC, Zielhuis RL (1991) Biological exposure and/or effect limits, facts, fallacies, and uncertainties: practical aspects. J Soc Occup Med 41: 55–59
Ogata M (1993) Japanese experience in biological monitoring. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 65:15–21
Pezzagno G, Imbriani M, Ghittori S, et al. (1986) Urinary elimination of acetone in experimental and occupational exposure. Scand J work Environ Health 12: 603–608
Sakai K, Ushio K, Takeuchi S, et al. (1989) Urine acetone and alcohol drinking (in Japanese). Jpn J Toxicol Occup Med 37: 734–738
Sato A (1993) Confounding factors in biological monitoring of exposure to organic solvents. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 65: S61-S67
Wigaeus E, Lot A, Nordqvist MB (1984) Uptake, distribution, metabolism, and elimination of stylene in man. A comparison between single exposure and co-exposure with acetone. Br J Ind Med 41: 539–546
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Satoh, T., Omae, K., Takebayashi, T. et al. Acetone excretion into urine of workers exposed to acetone in acetate fiber plants. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 67, 131–134 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00572237
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00572237