Skip to main content
Log in

External and internal antimony exposure in starter battery production

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the production of lead batteries two antimony compounds occur: in the casting of grids antimony trioxide (Sb2O3), and in the formation of lead plates stibine (SbH3). Seven workers from the gridcasting area and 14 workers from the formation area were examined with regard to the antimony concentration in blood (Sb-B) and urine (Sb-U). Antimony air concentrations (Sb-A) were measured by means of personal air samplers. Urine samples were collected at the end of the working week, at the beginning (U1) and the end (U2) of the shift, and at the beginning of work following a weekend without Sb exposure (U3). At U2 among the casters the median Sb-A exposure was 4.5 (1.18–6.6) μg Sb/m3 and among the formation workers, 12.4 (0.6–41.5) μg Sb/m3. The exposure in both groups is more than 10 times lower than the present threshold limit values. The median Sb-B concentrations in the preshift samples was 2.6 (0.5–3.4) μg Sb/l for the casters and 10.1 (0.5–17.9) μg Sb/l for the formation workers. The average Sb-U values (U2) were 3.9 (2.8–5.6) μg Sb/g creatinine in the casting area and 15.2 (3.5 23.4) μg Sb/g creatinine in the forming area. Our investigation indicates that the two antimony compounds show virtually equal pulmonary absorption and renal elimination. The statistically significant correlations between Sb-A/Sb-B and Sb-A/Sb-U form the basis for proposals regarding appropriate biological exposure limits for occupational antimony exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Angerer J, Schaller KH (eds) (1988) Analyses of hazardous substances in biological materials, vol 2. VCH, Weinheim, pp 31–45

  • Bailly R, Lauwerys R, Buchet JP, Mahieu P, Konings J (1991) Experimental and human studies on antimony metabolism: their relevance for the biological monitoring of workers exposed to inorganic antimony. Br J Ind Med 48:93–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies TAL (1973) The health of workers engaged in antimony oxide manufacture, a statement. Employment Medical Advertising Service, London, England, Nov. 1973:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (1993) MAK- und BATWerte Liste 1993. VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth DH, Stettler LE, Burg JR (1986) Carcinogenic effects of antimony trioxide and antimony ore concentrate in rats. J Toxicol Environ Health 18:607–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Kentner M, Leinemann M (1994) Umwelt- und arbeits-medizinische Bedeutung von Antimon und seinen wichtigsten Verbindungen. Zbl Arbeitsmed 44:46–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüdersdorf R, Fuchs A, Mayer P, Skulksuksai G, Schäcke G (1987) Biological assessment of exposure to antimony and lead in the glass-producing industry. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 59:469–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson B (1988) Determination of hydrides of arsenic, antimony and tin in workplace air. Ann Occup Hyg 32:385–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt WD, Kerfoot EJ (1981) Neoplastic effects of antimony trioxide. American Industrial Hygiene Conference, May 25 1981, Portland, Oregon, USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated in constant gratitude to our highly honoured mentor, Prof. Dr. med. H. Valentin, on the occasion of his 75th birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kentner, M., Leinemann, M., Schaller, KH. et al. External and internal antimony exposure in starter battery production. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 67, 119–123 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00572235

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00572235

Key words

Navigation