Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring distribution in distributed representations

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of distribution is often encountered in neural network architectures without any formal quantification. A method of quantifying the amount of distribution present in the hidden layer representations of a feed-forward network with binary inputs is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.J.Chalmers, “Syntactic transformations on distributed representations”, Connection Science, Vol. 2, Nos. 1–2, pp. 53–62, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L.Chrisman, “Learning recursive distributed representations for holistic computation”, Connection Science, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 345–365, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L.F.Niklasson and N.E.Sharkey, “Connectionism and the issues of compositionality and systematicity”, in R.Trappl (ed) Cybernetics and Systems, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.Browne and J.Pilkington, “Unification using a distributed representation”, ACM SIG Bulletin on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 5–7, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.Browne and J.Pilkington, “Variable binding in a neural network using a distributed representation,” in M.Verleijsen (ed) Proc. European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, pp. 199–204, D. Facto Publications: Brussels, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Browne and J. Pilkington, “Performing structure-sensitive processes on sub-symbolic representations”, Proc. Irish Neural Networks Conference, pp. 19–24, Dublin, 1994.

  7. L.F.Niklasson and M.Boden, “Representing structure and structured representations in connectionist networks”, in A.Browne (ed) Current Perspectives in Neural Computing, Institute of Physics Press: Bristol, UK, 1996 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.C.Mozer and P.Smolensky, “Using relevance to reduce network size automatically”, Connection Science, Vol. 1, pp. 3–16, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T.J.VanGelder, “Defining ‘distributed representation’”, Connection Science, Vol. 4, Nos. 3–4, pp. 175–192, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N.E.Sharkey, “The ghost of the hybrid: a study of uniquely connectionist representations”, AISB Quarterly, Vol. 79, pp. 10–16, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.Pollack, “Recursive distributed representations”, Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 46, pp. 77–105, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.L.Elman, “Structured representations and connectionist models”, Proc. 11th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 17–25, Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.W.Kentridge, “Neural computation and criticality”, in A.Browne (ed) Current Perspectives in Neural Computing, Institute of Physics Press: Bristol, UK, 1996 (in Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Browne, A. Measuring distribution in distributed representations. Neural Process Lett 3, 73–79 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571680

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571680

Key words

Navigation