Skip to main content
Log in

Microgenesis of the length perception of paired lines

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The changes in perception associated with exposure time are probably continuous in the microgenetic process, as is demonstrated by such phenomena as intensity change in illusions, adaptation and normalization, practice effect, aftereffects, etc. The simultaneous contrast and assimilation in the perception of length of paired lines were measured by controlling the exposure duration or repetition. In the tachistoscopic experiment, the greatest contrast appeared at an early stage of microgenesis. In the repeated presentation experiment, the perception changed from contrast to assimilation on the expanded stage of microgenesis. These changes in perception are assumed to be the results of the differentiation of set that progresses in the microgenetic process. In the fixed-set experiment, the differentiation of set was reflected in the intensity of the aftereffect. The changes in the aftereffect and the transformation into the assimilation coincided with each other when the exposure time was varied. An expansion of the conception of perceptual microgenesis to a wider range of perceptual variability is accordingly proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachmann, T. (1987). Different trends in perceptual pattern microgenesis as a function of the spatial range of local brightness averaging: Towards an empirical method for the differentiation between global and local levels form as related to processing in real time.Psychological Research, 49, 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. W. (1988).The life of mind: Selected papers. Hillsdale, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draguns, J. G. (1986). Subliminal perception as the first stage of perception: Can personality be revealed so early in the sequence? In G. Smith, U. Hentschel, & J. Draguns (Eds.),The roots of perception. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H., & Draguns, J. (1957). A microgenetic approach to perception and thought.Psychological Bulletin, 54, 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fröhlich, W. D. (1984). Microgenesis as a functional approach to information processing through search. In W. D. Fröhlich, G. Smith, J. G. Draguns, & U. Hentschel (Eds.),Psychological processes in cognition and personality. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1933). Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines.Journal of Experimental Psychology,16, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1937a). Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of titled lines, II: Simultaneous contrast and the areal restriction of the after-effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 553–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1937b). Adaptation with negative after-effect.Psychological Review, 44, 222–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, R. E. (Ed.) (1991).Cognitive microgenesis: A neuropsychological perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson H. (1964).Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Low.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kragh, U., & Smith, G. (1970).Percept-genetic analysis. Lund, Sweden: Gleerups.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakatani, K. (1985). Application of the method of fixed set to the size-weight illusion.Psychological Research, 47, 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakatani, K. (1989). Fixed set in the perception of size in relation to lightness.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 415–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1963). Le développement des perceptions en fonction de l'age. In J. Piaget & P. Fraisse (Eds.),Traité de Psychologie Expérimentale, 6, Perception. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds, R. I. (1978). The microgenetic development of the Ponzo and Zöllner illusions.Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, F. (1928). Experimentelle Ergebnisse der Gestaltpsychologie.Bericht über den 10. Kongress für experimentelle Psychologie. (Reprinted in C. F. Sander & H. Volkelt (Eds.),Ganzheitspsychologie (1962). Munich: Beck.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, F. (1930). Structures, totality of experience, and gestalt. In C. Murchison (Ed.),Psychologies of 1930. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. J. W., Johnson, G., & Almgren, P. (1989).MCT — The metacontrast technique, manual. Stockholm: PsykologiFölaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uznadze, D. (1966).The psychology of set. New York: Consultants Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H. (1956). Microgenesis and aphasia.Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 52, 347–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaporozhets, A. V. (1960).Razvitie Proizvosnykh dvizhenii. Moscow: Akademiia Pedagogicheskikh Nauk RSFSR (Japanese translation, 1964, Zuiiundou no Hattatsu. Tokyo: Sekai-shoin.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nakatani, K. Microgenesis of the length perception of paired lines. Psychol. Res 58, 75–82 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571096

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571096

Keywords

Navigation