Review of Accounting Studies

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 267–284 | Cite as

Bankruptcy classification errors in the 1980s: An empirical analysis of Altman's and Ohlson's models

  • Joy Begley
  • Jin Ming
  • Susan Watts
Article

Abstract

Empirical accounting researchers often use Altman's (1968) and Ohlson's (1980) bankruptcy prediction models as indicators of financial distress. While these models performed relatively well when they were estimated, we show that they do not perform as well in more recent periods (in particular, the 1980s), even when the coefficients are re-estimated. When we compare the performance of Ohlson's original model to our re-estimated version of his model and to that of Altman's original and re-estimated models, we find that Ohlson's original model displays the strongest overall performance. Given that Ohlson's original model is frequently used in academic research as an indicator of financial distress, its strong performance in this study supports its use as a preferred model.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altman, E. (1968). “Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy.”Journal of Finance 23, 589–609.Google Scholar
  2. Altman, E., R. Haldeman, and P. Narayanan. (1977). “Zeta Analysis: A New Model to Identify Bankruptcy Risks of Corporations.”Journal of Banking and Finance 1, 29–54.Google Scholar
  3. Burgstahler, D., J. Jiambalvo, and E. Noreen. (1989). “Changes in the Probability of Bankruptcy and Equity Value.”Journal of Accounting and Economics 11, 207–224.Google Scholar
  4. Dichev, I. (1996). ‘Is the Risk of Bankruptcy a Systematic Risk?” Working paper, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  5. Francis, J. (1996). “Corporate Compliance with Debt Covenants.”Journal of Accounting Research 28, 326–347.Google Scholar
  6. Harris, M., and A. Raviv. (1993). “The Design of Bankruptcy Procedures.” Working paper, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  7. Hopwood, W., J. McKeown, and J. Mutchler. (1994). “A Reexamination of Auditor Versus Model Accuracy Within the Context of the Going-Concern Opinion Decision.”Contemporary Accounting Research 10, 409–431.Google Scholar
  8. Jensen, M. (1986). “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers.”American Economic Review 76, 323–329.Google Scholar
  9. Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. (1976). “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.”Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–360.Google Scholar
  10. Jones, F. (1987). “Current Techniques in Bankruptcy Prediction.”Journal of Accounting Literature 6, 131–164.Google Scholar
  11. Moyer, R. (1977). “Forecasting Financial Failure: A Re-examination.”Financial Management 6, 11–17.Google Scholar
  12. Ohlson, J. (1980). “Financial Ratios and the Probabilistic Prediction of Bankruptcy.”Journal of Accounting Research 18, 109–131.Google Scholar
  13. Stone, M. (1991). “Firm Financial Stress and Pension Plan Continuation/Replacement Decisions.”Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 10, 175–206.Google Scholar
  14. Subramanyam, K., and J. Wild. (1996). “The Going Concern Assumption and the Informativeness of Earnings.”Contemporary Accounting Research 13, 251–274.Google Scholar
  15. Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. (1986).Positive Accounting Theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Zavgren, C. (1983). “The Prediction of Corporate Failure: The State of the Art.”The Journal of Accounting Literature 2, 1–38.Google Scholar
  17. Zmijewski, M. (1984). “Methodological Issues Related to the Estimation of Financial Distress Prediction Models.”Journal of Accounting Research 22, 59–82.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joy Begley
    • 1
  • Jin Ming
    • 2
  • Susan Watts
    • 3
  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Indiana UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations