Skip to main content
Log in

A simple reproducible method for prometaphase chromosome analysis

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A method is described for the analysis of chromosomes in prophase and early metaphase. It involves culturing the lymphocytes in medium RPMI-1640, supplemented with 10% autologous plasma instead of fetal bovine serum. Living cells are treated with actinomycin D and colcemid for 1 h prior to harvest and harvested early at 65 h of incubation, using a hypotonic solution formulated by Ohnuki (1968). The method has been tested on several hundred clinical samples on a routine basis. On average, 30% of the dividing cells were in prometaphase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen FS, Moen RP, Hollstein U (1976) Preferred based sites of actinomycin-deoxyribonucleic acid binding by circular dichroism. J Am Chem Soc 98:864–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Arakaki DT, Sparkes RS (1963) Microtechnique for culturing leukocytes from whole blood. Cytogenetics 2:57–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi FE, Hsu TC (1965) Experimental alteration of metaphase chromosome morphology. Exp Cell Res 39:305–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigger TRL, Savage JRK (1975) Mapping G-bands on human prophase chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 15:112–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke JH, Jenkins DP, Lawson RK, Osgood EE (1962) Human chromosome uncoiling and dissociation. Ann Hum Genet 26: 139–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspersson T, Zech L, Johansson C, Modest EJ (1970) Identification of human chromosomes by DNA-binding fluorescing agents. Chromosoma 30:215–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspersson T, Lomakka G, Zech L, (1971) Twenty-four fluorescence patterns of human metaphase chromosomes—distinguishing characters and variability. Hereditas 67:89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Drets ME, Shaw MW (1971) Specific banding patterns of human chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68:2073–2077

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutrillaux B (1975) Obtention simulltanee de plusieur marquages chromosomiques sur les memes preparations, apres traitement par le BrdU. Hum Genet 30:297–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutrillaux B, Lejeune J (1971) Sur une nouvelle technique d'analyse du caryotype humain. C R Acad Sci [D] (Paris) 272:2638–2640

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutrillaux B, Laurent C, Couturier J, Lejeune J (1973) Coloration par l'acridine orange, de chromosome prealablement traites par le 5 bromodeoxyuridine (BudR). C R Acad Sci [D] (Paris) 276: 3179–3181

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutrillaux B, Viegas-Pequignot E (1981) High resolution R- and G-banding on the same preparation. Hum Genet 57:93–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JH, Young RB (1961) Chromosome analysis from small volumes of blood. Lancet ii:48–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Francke U, Oliver N (1978) Quantitative analysis of high-resolution trypsin-Giemsa bands on human prometaphase chromosomes. Hum Genet 45:137–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford DA (1965) Leukocytes cultured from small inocula of whole blood and the preparation of metaphase chromosomes. Hum treatment with hypotonic KCl. Stain Technol 40:333–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford DA, Hungerford AM (1978) Chromosome structure and function in man. VI. Pachytene chromomere maps of 16, 17 and 18; pachytene as a reference standard for metaphase banding. Cytogenet Cell Genet 21:212–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford DA, Hungeford AM (1980) Pachytene chromomere maps of human chromosomes 19 and 20. Cytogenet Cell Genet 27:197–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford DA, Ashton FT, Balaban GB, La Badie GU, Messatzzia LR, Haller G, Miller AE (1972) The C-group pachytene bivalent with a locus characteristic for parachromosomally situated particulate bodies (parameres): A provisional map in human males. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:2165–2168

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford DA, La Badie GU, Balaban GB (1971a) Chromosome structure and function in man. II. Provisional maps of the two smallest autosomes (chromosomes 21 and 22) at pachytene in the male. Cytogenetics 10:33–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford DA, La Badie GU, Balaban GB, Messatzzia LR, Haller G, Miller AE (1971b) Chromosome structure and function in man. IV. Provisional maps of the three long acrocentric autosomes (chromosomes 13, 14, and 15 at pachytene in the male). Ann Genet (Paris) 14:257–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungerford DA, Mellman WJ, Balaban GB, La Badie GU, Messatzzia LR, Haller G (1970) Chromosome structure and function in man. III. Pachytene analysis and identification of the supernumerary chromosome in a case of Down's syndrome (mongolism). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 67:221–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisner LF, Chuprevich TW, Inhorn SL (1977) Mechanisms of chromatid breakage in human lymphocyte cultures. Acta Cytol (Baltimore) 21:555–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorhead PS, Nowell PC, Mellman WJ, Battips DM, Hungerford DA (1960) Chromosome preparations of leukocytes cultured from human peripheral blood. Exp Cell Res 20:613–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnuki Y (1968) Demonstration of the spiral structure of human chromosomes. Nature 208:916–917

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohnuki Y (1968) Structure of chromosomes. I. Morphological studies of the spiral structure of human somatic chromosomes. Chromosoma 25:402–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostertag W, Kersten W (1965) The action of proflavin and actinomycin D in causing chromatid breakage in human cells. Exp Cell Res 39: 296–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathak S, McGill M, Hsu TC (1975) Actinomycin D effects on mitosis and chromosomes: sticky chromatids and localized lesions. Chromosoma 50:79–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil SR, Merrick S, Lubs HA (1971) Identification of each human chromosome with a modified Giemsa stain. Science 173:821–822

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnedl W (1971) Analysis of the human karyotype using a reassociation technique. Chromosoma 34:448–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabright M (1971) A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet ii:971–972

    Google Scholar 

  • Summer AT, Evans HJ, Buckland RA (1971) A new technique for distinguishing between human chromosomes. Nature 232:31–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Viegas-Pequignot E, Dutrillaux B (1978) Une methode simple pour obtenir des prophases et des prometaphases. Am Genet (Paris) 21:122–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu RL, Aronson MM, Nichols WW (1981) High-resolution bands in human fibroblast chromosomes induced by actinomycin D. Cytogenet Cell Genet 31:111–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunis JJ (1976) High resolution of human chromosomes. Science 191: 1268–1270

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunis JJ (1981) Mid-prophase human chromosomes. The attainment of 2000 bands. Hum Genet 56:293–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunis JJ, Sawyer JR, Ball DW (1978) The characterization of high resolution G-banded chromosomes of man. Chromosoma 67: 293–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunis JJ, Ball DW, Sawyer JR (1979) G-banding pattern of high resolution human chromosomes 6-22, X, and Y. Hum Genet 49: 291–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Zakharov AF, Egolina NA (1972) Differential spiralization along mammalian mitotic chromosomes. 1. BudR-revealed differentiation in Chinese hamster chromosomes. Chromosoma 38:341–365

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rybak, J., Tharapel, A., Robinett, S. et al. A simple reproducible method for prometaphase chromosome analysis. Hum Genet 60, 328–333 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00569213

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00569213

Keywords

Navigation