Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 97–109 | Cite as

Application of the Geometrical Theory of Diffraction to closed cracks

  • Gert Persson


The purpose of this paper is to compare the scattering of ultrasound by means of different types of smooth planar cracks in elastic solids. The boundary conditions on the flaws are of a type that incorporates interfacial forces. A crack that is partly closed by a static background pressure can thus be modeled. The Geometrical Theory of Diffraction (GTD) is used to predict the pulse-echo response from the crack. Previously obtained diffraction and reflection coefficients for cracks with interfacial forces are reviewed and some numerical difficulties are discussed. The backscattered echo amplitude is numerically calculated and compared for some different crack types and crack shapes. The presence of interfacial forces, due to background pressure, significantly influences the scattering behavior of the cracks. For a background pressure of 250 MPa, the backscattered amplitude, using our model of the interfacial forces, is typically reduced by 5–20 dB.

Key words

Scattering GTD spring contact closed crack 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. K. Chapman, NDTAC computer programs for theoretical modeling of smooth planar defects—user guide. CEGB report OED/PITW/88/5025/R, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. D. Achenbach, A. K. Gautesen, and H. McMaken,Ray Methods for Waves in Elastic Solids with Applications to Scattering by Cracks (Pitman, London, 1982).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. A. Martin and G. R. Wickham, Diffraction of elastic waves by a penny-shaped crack: Analytical and numerical results,Proc. R. Soc. London A390:91–129 (1983).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. M. Coffey and R. K. Chapman, Application of elastic scattering theory for smooth flat cracks to the quantitative prediction of ultrasonic defect detection and sizing,Nucl. Energy 22(5)(Oct.):319–333 (1983).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Wirdelius, Probe model implementation in the null field approach to crack scattering,Com. Div. Mech. 91:7 (Chalmers University of Technology, 1991).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Persson and P. Olsson, 2-D elastodynamic scattering from a semi-infinite cracklike flaw with interfacial forces,Wave Motion 13:21–41 (1991).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Olsson, Elastodynamic scattering from pennyshaped and non-planar cracklike flaws with dissipation and restoring forces,J. Appl. Mech. 57:661–666 (1990).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Boström and G. Wickham, On the boundary conditions for ultrasonic transmission by partially closed cracks,Com. Div. Mech. 91:2 (Chalmers University of Technology, 1991).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. F. Haines, The theory of sound transmission and reflection at contacting surfaces, Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories RD/B/N/4744, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. P. Jones and J. S. Whittier, Waves at a flexibly bonded interface,J. Appl. Mech. 34:905–909 (1967).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. Lakestani, PISC III Action N°6: Mathematical modeling, Validation of the mathematical models of the ultrasonic inspection of the steel components—draft report, PISC DOC (90) 12, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Boström and P. Olsson, Scattering of elastic waves by non-planar cracks,Wave Motion 9:61–76 (1987).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gert Persson
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of MechanicsChalmers University of TechnologyGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations