Oecologia

, Volume 94, Issue 4, pp 496–502 | Cite as

Herbivore deme formation on individual trees: a test case

  • Neil S. Cobb
  • Thomas G. Whitham
Original Papers

Abstract

We examined the deme-formation hypothesis, which states that sessile herbivores on long-lived hosts become locally adapted to the defensive phenotypes of individual trees. We showed a five-fold increase in resistance by individual pinyon pines (Pinus edulis) to the pinyon pine needle scale (Matsucoccus acalyptus). Although such variation could represent a significant selection pressure favoring deme formation, two lines of evidence led to rejection of the hypothesis. First, there were no significant differences in mortality among scale populations in a reciprocal transfer experiment. Second, a seven-year experiment showed that mortality of newly founded, incipient scale populations was similar to established scale populations. While our experiments fail to support the deme-formation hypothesis, they do demonstrate significant variation in the resistance traits of a natural tree population. Although we feel that demeformation is still probable in this system, it is likely to occur on a larger geographic scale than individual trees as proposed by Edmunds and Alstad.

Key words

Deme formation Fine-scale adaptation Host plant resistance Matsucoccus acalyptus Pinus edulis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alstad DN, Corbin KW (1990) Scale insect allozyme differentiation within and between host trees. Evol Ecol 4: 43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alstad DN, Edmunds GF (1983a) Selection, outbreeding depression, and the sex ratio of scale insects. Science 220: 93–95Google Scholar
  3. Alstad DN, Edmunds GF (1983b) Adaptation, host specificity, and gene flow in the black pineleaf scale. In: RF Denno, MS McClure (eds). Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Alstad DN, Edmunds GF (1987) Black pineleaf scale population density in relation to interdemic mating (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). Ann Rev Soc Am 7: 532–536Google Scholar
  5. Alstad DN, Edmunds GF, Johnson SC (1980) Host adaptation, sex ratio, and flight activity in male black pineleaf scale. Ann Entomol Soc Am 73: 665–667Google Scholar
  6. Arnett RH (1985) American insects: a handbook of the insects of America north of Mexico. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Ayre DJ (1985) Localized adaptation of clones of the sea anemoneActinia tenebrosa. Evolution 39: 1250–1260Google Scholar
  8. Bradshaw AD (1984) Ecological significance of genetic variation between populations. In: Dirzo R, Sarukhan J (eds), Perspectives in Plant Population Biology, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA pp 213–228Google Scholar
  9. Brown AHD (1979) Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theoret Pop Biol 15: 1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cates RG, Redak RA (1987) Variation in the terpene chemistry of Douglas-fir and its relationship to western spruce budworm success. In: KC Spencer (ed.), Chemical Mediation of Coevolution. Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Dewey SE, Heywood JS (1988) Spatial genetic structure in a population ofPsycotria nervosa. 1. distribution of genotypes. Evolution 42: 834–838Google Scholar
  12. Edmunds GF (1983) The ecology of black pineleaf scale. Environ Entomol 2: 765–777Google Scholar
  13. Edmunds GF, Alstad DN (1978) Coevolution in insect herbivores and conifers. Science 199: 941–945Google Scholar
  14. Edmunds GF, Alstad DN (1981) Responses of black pineleaf scales to plant variability. In: Denno RF, Dingle H (eds), Insect Life History Patterns, Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Endler JA (1977) Geographic Variation, Speciation and Clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  16. Endler JA (1985) Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  17. Feder JL, Chilcote CA, Bush GL (1988) Genetic differentiation between sympatric host races of the apple maggot flyRhagoletis pomonella. Nature 336: 61–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Futuyma DJ, Peterson SC (1985) Genetic variation in the use of resources by insects. Ann Rev Entomol 30: 217–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Futuyma DJ, Philippi TE (1987) Genetic variation and covariation in responses to host plants byAlsophila pometaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Evolution 41: 269–279Google Scholar
  20. Guttman SI, Wood TK, Karlin AA (1981) Genetic differentiation along host plant lines in the sympatricEchenopa binotata Say complex (Homoptera: Membracidae). Evolution 35: 205–217Google Scholar
  21. Halle F, Oldeman RAA, Tomlinson PB (1978) Tropical Trees and Forests: An Architectural Analysis. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanks LM, Denno RF (1992) The role of Demic adaptation in colonization and spread of scale insect populations. In: Kim KC (ed.) Evolution of Insect Pests: The Patterns of Variations. John Wiley & Sons New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Hughes-Schrader S (1948) Cytology of coccids. Adv Genet 2: 127–203Google Scholar
  24. Jain SK, Bradshaw AD (1986) Evolutionary divergence among adjacent plant populations. I. The evidence and its theoretical analysis. Heredity 21: 407–441Google Scholar
  25. Karban R (1989) Fine-scale adptation of herbivorous thrips to individual host plants. Nature 340: 60–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kearsley MC, Whitham TG (1989) Developmental changes in resistance to herbivory: implications for individuals and populations. Ecology 70: 422–434Google Scholar
  27. Krombein KD, Hurd Jr. PD, Smith DR Burks BD (1979) Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico, 3 vols. Washington D.C. Smithsonian PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewontin RC (1974) The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. Columbia Univ. Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. McCambridge WF, Pierce DA (1964) Observations on the life history of the pinyon pine needle scaleMatsucoccus acalyptus (Homoptera: Coccoidea: Margarodidae). Entomol Soc Am Ann 57: 197–200Google Scholar
  30. McPheron BA, Smith C, Berlocher SH (1988a). Microgeographic genetic variation in the apple maggotRhagoletis pomonella. Genetics 119: 445–451Google Scholar
  31. McPheron BA, Smith C, Berlocher SH (1988b) Genetic differences between host races ofRhagoletis pomonella. Nature 336: 64–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mitter C, Futuyma DJ (1979) Population genetic consequences of feeding habits in some forest Lepidoptera. Genetics 92: 1005–1021Google Scholar
  33. Moran NA, Whitham TG (1988) Predicting population fluctuations of organisms with complex life cycles: an aphid example. Ecology 69: 1214–1218Google Scholar
  34. Parker MA (1985) Local population differentiation for compatibility in an annual legume and its host-specific fungal pathogen. Evolution 39: 713–723Google Scholar
  35. Pashley DP, Johnson SJ, Sparks AN (1985) Genetic population structure of migratory moths: The fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctudae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 78: 756–762Google Scholar
  36. Pilson D (1992) Relative resistance of goldenrod to aphid attack; changes throught the growing season. Evolution 46: 1230–1236Google Scholar
  37. Price PW (1984) Insect ecology, 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Price PW, Cobb N, Craig TP, Wilson Fernandes G, Itami JK, Mopper S, Preszler RW (1990) Insect herbivore population dynamics on trees and shrubs: new approaches relevant to latent and eruptive species and life table development. Insect-Plant Interac 2: 1–38Google Scholar
  39. Rice WR (1983) Sexual reproduction: An adaptation reducing parent-offspring contagion. Evolution 37: 1317–1320Google Scholar
  40. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–225Google Scholar
  41. SAS Institute Inc. (1990) Users Guide: Statistics, Version 5, ed. Cary North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  42. Sturgeon KB, Mitton JB (1986) Allozyme and morphological differentiation of mountain pine beetlesDendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) associated with host tree. Evolution 40: 290–302Google Scholar
  43. Unruh TR (1985) Insect-plant interactions of the pinyon needle scale and single leaf pinyon in Southern California. PhD Dissertation. University of California, RiversideGoogle Scholar
  44. Unruh TR, Luck RF (1987) Deme formation in scale insects: a test with the pinyon needle scale and a review of other evidence. Ecol Entomol 12: 439–449Google Scholar
  45. Wainhouse D, Howell RS (1983) Intraspecific variation in beech scale populations and in susceptibility of their hostFagus sylvatica Ecol Entomol 8: 351–359Google Scholar
  46. Waser NM, Price MV (1985) Reciprocal transplant experiments withDelphinium nelsonii (Ranunculaceae): Evidence for local adaptation. Am J Bot 72: 1726–1732Google Scholar
  47. Whitham TG (1983) Host manipulation of parasites: Within-plant vairation as a defense against rapidly evolving pests. In: Denno RF, McClure MS (eds), Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Whitham TG, Slobodchikoff CN (1981) Evolution by individuals, plant-herbivore interactions, and mosaics of genetic variability: The adaptive significance of somatic mutations in plants. Oecologia 49: 287–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wright S (1968) Evolution and the genetics of populations, Vol. 1. Genetic and Biometric Foundations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  50. Wright S (1969) Evolution and the Genetics of Populations. Vol. 4. Variability Within and Among Natural Populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  51. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical Analysis (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neil S. Cobb
    • 1
  • Thomas G. Whitham
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA

Personalised recommendations