Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sequential variation in the components of reproductive success in the distylousJasminum fruticans (Oleaceae)

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 2-year study of three natural populations of the distylousJasminum fruticans showed that mean fruit and seed production were significantly greater in shortstyled plants (thrums) than in long-styled plants (pins). In this study, we investigated the role of four sequential factors which may differentially influence fruit and seed set in the two floral morphs: (1) differences in flowering phenology, (2) a limitation of pollen transfer towards pins, (3) a differential capacity of the two morphs to act through famale and male function and (4) differential fruit abortion in the two morphs. Fruit set was significantly influenced by differences in flowering phenology although there were no differences in flowering time between the two morphs. supplementary pollinations in a natural population significantly increased fruit set and reduced the difference in fruit set between the two morphs in relation to controls, indicating a limitation on pollen transfer which was most severe towards pin stigmas. In reciprocal crosses, seed set was significantly dependent on the paternal and maternal identity of the pin parent. There was no significant variation among thrums for their performance as male or female parent. Furthermore, individual pin plants with relatively high percentage seed set as female parents gave poor seed set as male parents and vice-versa. Whereas fruit removal had no effect on seed number in thrum plants, a greater proportion of viable seeds were produced on pin plants which were left to naturally mature their fruits than on pins which had fruits artificially removed, suggesting the occurrence of selective fruit abortion in pins but not in thrums. The initially greater maternal fitness of thrums due to their greater success as pollen recipients may thus be opposed by increased viable seed set in the pins due to factors acting after the pollination stage. The relative reproductive success of floral morphs in the distylousJ. fruticans is thus differentially influenced by ecological factors occurring at different stages of the reproductive process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett SCH (1990) The evolution and adaptive significance of heterostyly. Trends Ecol Evol 5: 144–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SCH, Shore JS (1987) Variation and evolution of breeding systems in theTurnera ulmifolia L. complex (Turneraceae). Evolution 41: 340–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawa K (1980) Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11: 15–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa KS, Webb CJ (1984) Flower, fruit and seed abortion in tropical forest trees: implications for the evolution of maternal and paternal reproductive patterns. Am J Bot 71: 736–751

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach JH, Bawa KS (1980) Role of pollinators in the evolution of dioecy from distyly. Evolution 34: 467–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertin RI (1982) paternity and fruit production in trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans). Am Nat 119: 694–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DR (1991) Effects of floral traits on sequential components of fitness inIpomopsis aggregata. Am Nat 137: 713–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper BB (1988) Evidence for selective abortion inCryptantha flava. Am Nat 132: 318–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth D (1989) Evolution of low female fertility in plants: pollen limitation, resource allocation and genetic load. Trends Ecol Evol 4: 289–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov R (1982) The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1983) Herbivory. The dynamics of animal-plant interactions. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1877) The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin B, Ellestrand NC (1990) Male and female fertility variation in wild radish, a hermaphrodite. Am Nat 136: 87–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieringer G (1991) Variation in individual flowering time and reproductive success ofAgalinis strictifolia (Scrophulariceae). Am J Bot 78: 497–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Dommée B, Thompson JD, Cristini F (1992) Distylie chezJasminum fruticans L.: hypothèse de la pollinisation optimale basée sur les variations de l'écologie intraflorale. Bull Soc Bot France, 139: 223–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulberger R (1970) Floral dimorphism inAnchusa hybrida Ten. Isr J Bot 19: 37–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Escarré J, Thompson JD (1991) The effects of successional habitat variation and time of flowering on seed production inRumex acetosella. J Ecol 79: 1099–1112

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganders FR (1979) The biology of heterostyly. NZ J Bot 17: 607–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossaert M, Valero M (1988) Effect of ovule position in the pod on patterns of seed formation in two species ofLathyrus (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae). Am J Bot 75: 1714–1731

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn JR, Barrett SCH (1992) Experimental studies on the functional significance of heterostyly. Evolution 46: 43–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak MM, Jennersten O (1991) Bumblebee visitation and seed set inMelampyrum pratense andViscaria vulgaris: heterospecific pollen and pollen limitation. Oecologia 86: 99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd DG (1979) Evolution towards dioecy in heterostylous populations. Plant Syst Evol 131: 71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons EE, Antonovics J (1991) Breeding system evolution inLeavenworthia: breeding system variation and reproductive success in natural populations ofLeavenworthia crassa (Cruciferae). Am J Bot 78: 270–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall DL (1991) Nonrandom mating in wild radish: variation in pollen donor success and effects of multiple paternity among one to six donor populations. Am J Bot 78: 1404–1418

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall DL, Ellstrand NC (1986) Sexual selection inRaphanus sativus: experimental data on non random fertilization, maternal choice and consequences of multiple paternity. Am Nat 127: 446–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall DL, Ellstrand NC (1988) Effective mate choice in wild radish: evidence for selective seed abortion and its mechanism. Am Nat 131: 739–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazer SJ (1987) Parental effects on seed development and seed yield inRaphanus raphanistrum: implications for natural and selection selection. Evolution 41: 355–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Muenchow GE, Grebus M (1989) The evolution of dioecy from distyly: reevaluation of the hypothesis of the loss of long-tongued pollinators. Am Nat 133: 149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahay DL (1974) Adaptive significance of gamete competition. In: Linskens HF (ed) Fertilization in higher plants. North Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, pp 27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Olesen JM (1979) Floral morphology and pollen flow in the heterostylous speciesPulmonaria obscura Duncort (Boraginaceae). New Phytol 82: 757–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R (1970) Incompatibility and the pollen economy ofJepsonia parry. Am J Bot 57: 1036–1041

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R (1975) Complementary roles of Halictids and syrphids in the pollination ofJepsonia heterandra (Saxifragaceae). Evolution 29: 371–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R (1976) The reproductive system ofAmsinckia grandiflora, a distylous species. Syst Bot 1: 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R (1979) Pollen flow in a population ofPrimula vulgaris Huds. Bot J Linn Soc 78: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R (1980) Heterostyly, population composition, and pollen flow inHedyotis caerulea. Am J Bot 67: 95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipp M, Schou O (1981) An unusual heteromorphic incompatibility system. Distyly, self-incompatibility, pollen load and fecundity inAnchusa officinalis (Boraginaceae). New Phytol 89: 693–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittman KE, Levin D (1989) Effects of parental identities and environment on components of crossing success inPhlox drummondii. Am J Bot 76: 409–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Puech S (1986) Production de diaspores et potentialités de germination chez quelques espèces a fruits charnus, ornithochores, dans le sud-est de la France. Ecol Medit 12: 143–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (1983) Sexual selection in a hermaphroditic plant: Les Fleurs du Male. Nature 305: 706–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rameau C, Gouyon PH (1991) Resource allocation to growth, reproduction and survival inGladiolus: the cost of male function. J Evol Biol 4: 291–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratheke B, Lacey EP (1985) Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 16: 179–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha AJ, Stephenson AG (1991) Effects of nonrandom seed abortion on progeny performance inPhaseolus coccineus L. Evolution 45: 1198–1208

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross M (1990) Sexual asymmetry in hermaphroditic plants. Trends Ecol Evol 5: 43–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Inst. Inc. (1990) SAS/STAT Users Guide. Version 6, 4th edn, vol. 2. Cary, North Carolina

  • Schemske DW (1977) Flowering phenology and seed set inClaytonia virginica (Portulacaceae). Bull Torr Bot Club 104: 254–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlichting CD, Devlin B (1989) Male and female reproductive success in the hermaphroditic plantPhlox drummondii. Am Nat 133: 212–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt J (1983) Individual flowering phenology, plant size, and reproductive success inLinanthus androsaceus a California annual. Oecologia 59: 135–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton ML, Snow AA, Handel SN (1986) Floral evolution: attractiveness to pollinators increases male fitness. Science 232: 1625–1627

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG (1981) Fruit and flower abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12: 253–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AG, Bertin RI (1983) Male competition, female choice, and sexual selection in plants. In: Real L (ed) Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 109–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland S (1986) Patterns of fruit set: what controls fruit-flower ratios in plants? Evolution 40: 117–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland S (1987) Why hermaphroditic plants produce many more flowers than fruits: experimental tests withAgave mckelveyana. Evolution 41: 750–759

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland S, Delph LF (1984) On the importance of male fitness in plants: patterns of fruit set. Ecology 65: 1093–1104

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt R (1983) Pollinator-plant interactions and the evolution of breeding systems. In: Real L (ed) Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 51–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M, Pyke GH (1988) Reproduction inPolemonium: assessing the factors limiting seed set. Am Nat 131: 723–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionelle et Evolutive, C.N.R.S., Route de Mende, B.P. 5051, 34033, Montpellier Cedex, France

    John D. Thompson & Bertrand Dommée

Authors
  1. John D. Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bertrand Dommée
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, J.D., Dommée, B. Sequential variation in the components of reproductive success in the distylousJasminum fruticans (Oleaceae). Oecologia 94, 480–487 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00566962

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00566962

Key words

Search

Navigation