Advertisement

The moon

, Volume 7, Issue 3–4, pp 422–439 | Cite as

The end of the iron-core age

  • R. A. Lyttleton
Article

Abstract

The terrestrial planets aggregated essentially from small particles, to begin as solid cool bodies with the same general compositions, and there is no possibility of an iron-core developing within any of them at any stage. Their differing internal and surface properties receive ready explanation from their different masses which determine whether the pressures within are sufficient to bring about phase-changes. The claim that the terrestrial core can be identified by means of shockwave data as nickel-iron is based on theoretical misconception, whereas the actual seismic data establish an uncompressed-density value much lower than any such mixture could have. The onset of the Ramsey phase-change in the Earth takes the form of a rapid initial collapse to produce a large core in metallic state which thereafter continues to grow secularly as a result of radioactive heating and leads to reduction of surface-area at long last adequate to account for folded and thrusted mountain-building. The hypothesis implies a similar but retarded evolution for Venus. The Moon and Mars are too small in mass to have undergone the phase-change to a metallic core, and can have no resulting dipole field, nor can they develop terrestrial-type mountains. Effects resulting from a transition corresponding to the 20°-discontinuity will occur for Mars, including large-scale rifting at the surface, but will not occur on the Moon. Finally brief reference is made to subjective non-scientific factors associated with continued efforts to rely on the iron-core hypothesis despite its lack of any success in rendering the properties of the Earth explicable.

Keywords

Shockwave Surface Property Seismic Data Metallic State General Composition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Birch, F.: 1961,Geophys. J. Roy. Astron. Soc. 4, 309.Google Scholar
  2. Birch, F.: 1963,Solids under Pressure, McGraw-Hill, p. 146.Google Scholar
  3. Bullen, K. E.: 1963,Introduction to Seismology, 3rd edn., Ch. 13, Cambr. Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  4. Langmuir, I.: 1968,Pathological Science, Gen. Elec. Report No. 68-C-035.Google Scholar
  5. Leet, L. D. and Judson, S.: 1961,Physical Geology, Prentice-Hall, p. 358.Google Scholar
  6. Lyttleton, R. A.: 1963,Proc. Roy. Soc. A275, 3, 8.Google Scholar
  7. Lyttleton, R. A.: 1965,Proc. Roy. Soc. A287, 471.Google Scholar
  8. Lyttleton, R. A.: 1967,Proc. Roy. Soc. A296, 285.Google Scholar
  9. Lyttleton, R. A.: 1969,Astrophys. Space Sci. 5, 18.Google Scholar
  10. Lyttleton, R. A.: 1972,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 158, 463.Google Scholar
  11. Medawar, P. B.: 1972,The Hope of Progress, 102 Methuen.Google Scholar
  12. Ramsey, W. H.: 1948,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 108, 406.Google Scholar
  13. Ramsey, W. H.: 1949,Monthly Notices Geophys. Suppl. 5, 409.Google Scholar
  14. Ramsey, W. H.: 1950a,Monthly Notices Geophys. Suppl. 6, 42.Google Scholar
  15. Ramsey, W. H.: 1950b,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 110, 325.Google Scholar
  16. Ramsey, W. H.: 1950c,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 110, 444.Google Scholar
  17. Ramsey, W. H.: 1951,Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 111, 427.Google Scholar
  18. Ramsey, W. H.: 1954,Occas. Notes Roy. Astron. Soc. 3, 87.Google Scholar
  19. Rogers, A. E. E., Ingalls, R. P., and Rainville, L. P.: 1972,Astron. J. 77, 100.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. A. Lyttleton
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of AstronomyCambridgeEngland
  2. 2.Jet Populsion LaboratoryPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations