Summary
One hundred consecutive digitalis serum level determination requests and results were analyzed to evaluate the rational of ordering the test and utilizing the results at his hospital. Sixty-six percent of the reasons given for ordering the test were categorized as “acceptable”. As many as 25% of physicians requesting the test considered digitalis levels as “routine” diagnostic tests in a patient taking these drugs. There were 12 levels within the potentially toxic range, 19 below the usual therapeutic range. The physicians modified their therapeutic management in 38 patients as a result of their knowledge of the digitalis level in blood. It is concluded that digitalis level determinations at this hospital are reasonably well utilized and that knowledge of the digitalis levels improve the accuracy of digitalis utilization in at least one third of the patients in whom this test is done.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Goldberg, G. A., Abbott, J. A.: Letter: Explicit criteria for use of laboratory tests. Ann. Intern. Med.81(6, 857–858 (1974)
Anderson, A. C., Hodges, G. R., Barnes, W. G.: Determination of serum gentamicin sulfate levels-ordering patterns and use as a guide to therapy. Arch. Intern. Med.136, 785–787 (1976)
Ingelfinger, J. A., Goldman, P.: The serum digitalis concentration-does it diagnose digitalis toxicity? N. Engl. J. Med.294, 867–870 (1976)
Huffman, D. H., Azarnoff, D. L.: The absorption of orally given digoxin preparation. J. Am. Med. Assoc.222, 957–960 (1972)
Huffman, D. H.: Clinical use of digitalis glycosides. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm.33, 170–185 (1976)
Goldman, R. H.: The use of serum digoxin levels in clinical practice. J. Am. Med. Assoc.229, 331–332 (1975)
Smith, T. W.: Digitalis toxicity: Epidemiology and clinical use of serum concentration measurements. J. Am. Med. Assoc.58, 470–476 (1975)
Avery, G. S.: Drug treatment-principles and practice of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. Acton, Massachusetts: Publishing Sciences Group, Inc., ADIS Press 1976
Huffman, D. H., Crow, J. W., Pentikainen, P., Azarnoff, D. L.: Association between clinical cardiac status, laboratory parameters and digoxin usage. Am. Heart J.91, 28–34 (1976)
Smith, T. W., Haber, E.: Clinical value of the radioimmunoassay of the digitalis glycosides. Pharmacol. Rev.25, 219–228 (1973)
Bertler, A., Redfors, A.: Plasma levels of digoxin in relation in toxicity. Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol.29, 281 (1971)
Beller, G. A., Smith, T. W., Abelmann, W. H., Haber, E., Hood, W. B.: Digitalis intoxication. N. Engl. J. Med.281, 989–997 (1971)
Smith, T. W., Butler, V. P., Haber, E.: Determination of therapeutic and toxic serum digoxin concentration by radioimmunoassay. N. Engl. J. Med.281, 1212–1216 (1969)
Fogelman, A. M., Finkelstein, S., LaMont, J. T., Rado, E., Pearce, M. L.: Fallibility of plasma-digoxin in differentiating toxic from non-toxic patients. Lancet1971/II, 727–729
Grahame-Smith, D. G.: Measurement of digoxin in plasma and its use in diagnosis of digoxin intoxication. Br. Med. J.1969/I, 28–29
Evered, D. C., Chapman, C.: Plasma digoxin concentrations and digoxin toxicity of hospital patients. Br. Heart J.33, 540–545 (1971)
Smith, T. W., Haber, E.: Digoxin intoxication: The relationship of clinical presentation to serum digoxin concentration. J. Clin. Pharmacol.49, 2377–2386 (1970)
Carruthers, J. G., Kelly, J. G., McDevitt, D. G.: Plasma digoxin concentrations in patients on admission to hospital. Br. Heart J.36, 707–712 (1974)
Duhme, D. W., Greenblatt, D. J., Koch-Weser, J.: Reduction of digoxin toxicity associated with measurement of serum levels. Ann. Intern. Med.80, 516–519 (1974)
Kampman, J., Siersbaek-Nielson, K. Kristensen, M., Hansen, J. M.: Rapid evaluation of creatinine clearance. Acta Med. Scand.196, 517–520 (1974)
Lasagna, L.: How useful are serum digitalis measurements? Editorial. N. Engl. J. Med.294, 898–899 (1976)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hladik, W.B., Dujovne, C.A. One hundred digitalis blood levels. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 15, 411–415 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00561740
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00561740