Skip to main content
Log in

Plasma theophylline concentrations following the oral administration of microcrystalline theophylline and a new sustained-release theophylline preparation to normal subjects

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Plasma theophylline concentrations have been measured in 14 normal subjects following the oral administration of a microcrystalline theophylline preparation (MT) 187.5 mg every 6 h and a sustained-release theophylline preparation (SRT) 375 mg every 12 h for 5 days. During the 5 days, blood samples were drawn before and 2 h after each morning dose with MT, and before and 4.5 h after each morning dose of SRT. On days 1 and 5, more frequent samples were taken during the dose interval. With both preparations, steady-state plasma concentrations were achieved by the third day. The trough levels were significantly higher with SRT than with MT on days 3 and 4, and the levels at 4.5 h after SRT were significantly higher than those measured 2 h after MT on days 3, 4 and 5. Over the terminal 3 days of the study, mean theophylline concentrations with SRT ranged between 11.2 and 15.5 µg/ml at measured trough and peak times, whereas the mean trough levels with MT were always below 10 µg/ml. With adjustment for the dosage differences, the mean ratio of the areas under the plasma concentration/time curves for the final dosage interval for the two formulations (AUCSRT/AUCMT) was 1.29±0.56, suggesting that the SRT preparation was well absorbed. The “mean” steady-state plasma theophylline concentrations (AUC/dose interval) on day 5 were 11.5±4.7 µg/ml with MT and 13.7±5.7 µg/ml with SRT. Nine subjects experienced a total of 35 side-effects whilst taking MT, compared with 10 subjects complaining of 23 side-effects on SRT. These results indicate that, in normal subjects, SRT 375 mg every 12 h exhibited satisfactory sustained-release properties and achieved adequate mean plasma theophylline concentrations during chronic administration. It produced higher plasma levels and a lower incidence of side-effects than the same daily dose of MT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Jenne JW, Wyze E, Rood FS, MacDonald FM (1972) Pharmacokinetics of theophylline. Application to adjustment of the clinical dose of aminophylline. Clin Pharmacol Ther 13: 349–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonkman JHG, Berg WC, Schoenmaker R, De Zeeuw RA, Orie NGM (1979) The absolute bioavailability of microcrystalline theophylline. Curr Med Res Opin 6. Suppl 6: 71–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JG, Leahey WJ (1976) Measurement of theophylline in plasma by high performance liquid chromatography. Br J Clin Pharmacol 3: 947

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitenko PA, Ogilvie RI (1973) Rational intravenous doses of theophylline. N Engl J Med 289: 600–603

    Google Scholar 

  • Piafsky KM, Ogilvie RI (1975) Dosage of theophylline in bronchial asthma. N Engl J Med 292: 1218–1222

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger M, Riegelman S (1974) Rational use of theophylline for bronchodilatation. N Engl J Med 291: 151–153

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, C.J., Elwood, R.K., Kinney, C. et al. Plasma theophylline concentrations following the oral administration of microcrystalline theophylline and a new sustained-release theophylline preparation to normal subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 18, 351–354 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00561394

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00561394

Key words

Navigation