Abstract
A number of recent papers have developed normative implications of the concept of reference price. In this paper, we extend that literature to incorporate the relationship between expected quality and reference price. We consider the case of a monopolist who makes time-varying decisions regarding price and product quality. Our results suggest that when the effect of a loss (price greater than reference price and product quality less than expected quality) on demand is greater than or equal to that of a corresponding gain, it is optimal for a monopolist to have constant price and product quality levels. When the effect of a gain on demand is greater than that of a corresponding loss, however, we find that it is optimal to maintain cyclical pricing and product quality policies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chintagunta, P., and D. Jain. (1992), “A Dynamic Model of Channel Member Strategies for Marketing Expenditures,”Marketing Science, 11 (Spring), 168#188.
Greenleaf, Eric A. (1995). “The Impact of Reference Price Effects on the Profitability of Price Promotions,”Marketing Science, 14 (Winter), 82–104.
Hardie, Bruce G. S., Eric J. Johnson, and Peter S. Fader. (1993). “Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice,”Marketing Science, 12 (Fall), 378–394.
Hartl, Richard F., and Suresh P. Sethi. (1984). “Optimal control Problems With Differential Inclusions: Sufficiency Conditions and an Application to a Production-Inventory Model,”Optimal Control Applications and Methods, 5, 289–307.
Jacoby, Jacob, and Jerry Olson (eds.). (1985).Perceived Quality: How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Kopalle, Praveen K., Ambar G. Rao, and João L. Assunção. (1994). “Asymmetric Reference Effects and Dynamic Pricing Policies.”Marketing Science.
Krishnamurthi, Lakshman, Tridib Mazumdar, and S.P. Raj. (1992). “Asymmetric Response to Price in Consumer Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Decisions,”Journal of Consumer Research 19 (December), 387–400.
Lambin, Jean Jacques. (1976).Advertising, Competition and Market Conduct in Oligopoly Over Time, New York: North-Holland.
Nelson, P. (1970). “Information and Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Political Economy, 78 (March), 311–329.
Oliver, R.L., and R.S. Winer (1987). “A Framework for the Formation and Structure of Consumer Expectations: Review and Propositions.”Journal of Economic Psychology, 8 (December), 469–499.
Putler, Daniel. (1992). “Incorporating Reference Price Effects Into an Theory of Consumer Choice,”Marketing Science (Summer), 287–309.
Sorger, G. (1988). “Reference Price Formation and Optimal Marketing Strategies.”Optimal Control Theory and Economic Analysis, 3, 97–120.
Tellis, Gerard J. (1988). “The Price Elasticity of Selective Demand: A Meta-Analysis of Econometric Models of Sales,”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (November), 331–341.
Turner, R.E. and J.C. Wiginton. (1976). “Advertising Expenditure Trajectories: An Empirical Study for Filter Cigarettes 1953–1965”,Decision Sciences 7, 496–506.
Varian, Hal. (1992),Microeconomic Analysis, New York: Norton.
Winer, Russell S. (1986). “A Reference Price Model of Brand Choice for Frequently Purchased Products,”Journal of Consumer Research 13 (September), 250–256.
Yi, Youjae. (1990). “A Critical Review of Consumer Satisfaction.” In Valarie A. ZeithamlReview of Marketing (pp. 68–123). Chicago: American Marketing Association
Zeithaml, Valarie. (1988). “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence.”Journal of Marketing 52 (July), 2–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kopalle, P.K., Winer, R.S. A dynamic model of reference price and expected quality. Market Lett 7, 41–52 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00557310
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00557310