Skip to main content
Log in

Advertising effects on consumer welfare: Prices paid and liking for brands selected

  • Published:
Marketing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of advertising on consumer welfare has been the subject of dispute among economists, arising largely from disagreement among scholars regarding the persuasive versus the informative role of advertising. This paper reports two experiments that explore the welfare implications of advertising effects. Experiment 1 shows that the same advertisements can either increase or decrease prices paid for selected brands, depending on the degree to which the choice situation requires brands to be recalled in order to be considered. However, an increase in prices paid caused by advertising does not necessarily imply detrimental effects on consumer welfare. Experiment 2 shows that, even under circumstances in which differentiating advertising leads consumers to select brands with higher average prices, it can provide useful information to consumers that allows them to make purchases that are more in line with their personal tastes than are the choices of consumers not exposed to the advertisements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alba, Joseph W., J. Wesley Hutchinson, and John G. LynchJr. (1991). “Memory and Decision Making.” In Thomas S. Robertson and Harold H. Kassarjian (eds.),Handbook of Consumer Behavior (pp. 1–49). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain, Joseph S. (1956).Barriers to New Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benham, Lee. (1972). “The Effect of Advertising on the Price of Eyeglasses.”Journal of Law and Economics 15 (October), 337–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, William, Eunkyu, Lee, and Richard Stelin. (1994). “Mastering the Mix: Do Advertising, Promotion, and Sales Force Activities Lead to Differentiation?”Journal of Marketing Research 31 (May), 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cady, John. (1976). “Advertising Restrictions and Retail Prices.”Journal of Advertising Research 16 (October), 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, Gregory S., Rashi Glaser, and Kent Nakamoto. (1994). “Meaningful Brands from Meaningless Differentiation: The Dependence on Irrelevant Attributes.”Journal of Marketing Research 31 (August), 339–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comanor, William S., and Thomas A. Wilson. (1974).Advertising and Market Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comanor, William S., and Thomas A. Wilson (1979). “The Effects of Advertising on Competition: A Survey.”Journal of Economic Literature 17 (June), 453–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskin, Gerald J., and Penny H. Baron. (1977). “Effects of Price and Advertising in Test-Marketing Experiments.”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (November), 499–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, Paul W., and Mark S. Albion. (1980). “The Impact of Advertising on the Price of Consumer Products.”Journal of Marketing 44 (Summer), 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, Paul W., and David J. Reibstein. (1979). “How Prices, Ad Expenditures and Profits are Linked.”Harvard Business Review 57 (November-December), 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Timothy, David Mothersbaugh, Michael McCarthy, and Gangseog Ryu. (1995). “Peripheral Cues as Sources of Market Inefficiencies in the U.S. and Russia.” In Frank Kardes and Mita Sujan (eds.),Advances in Consumer Research, (vol. 22, pp. 511–517), Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, Stephen J., and John Deighton. (1989). “Managing What Consumers Learn from Experience.”Journal of Marketing, 53 (April), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanetkar, Vijay, Charles B. Weinberg, and Doyle L. Weiss. (1992). “Price Sensitivity and Television Advertising Exposures: Some Empirical Findings,”Marketing Science 11 (Fall), 359–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthi, Lakshman, and S.P. Raj. (1985). “The Effect of Advertising on Consumer Price Sensitivity.”Journal of Marketing, Research 22 (May), 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, Jean J. (1976).Advertising, Competition and Market Conduct in Oligopoly Over Time. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, Anusree, and John G. LynchJr. (1995). “Toward a Reconciliation of Market Power and Information Theories of Advertising Effects on Price Elasticity.”Journal of Consumer Research 21 (March), 644–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedungadi, Prakash. (1990). “Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets: Influencing Choice Without Altering Brand Evaluations.”Journal of Consumer Research 17 (December), 263–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Phillip H. (1974). “Advertising as Information.”Journal of Political Economy 81 (July/August), 729–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, A., and B. Stern. (1977). “An Analysis of Information Content of Television Advertising.”Journal of Marketing 41 (January), 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Sherwin. (1978). “Advertising, Information, and Product Differentiation.” In David Tuerck (ed),Issues in Advertising (pp. 161–191). washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, B., D. Krugman, and A. Resnik. (1981). “Magazine Advertising: An Analysis of Its Information Content.”Journal of Advertising Research 21 (April), 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telser, Lester G. (1964). “Advertising and Competiton.”Journal of Political Economy 72 (December), 537–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittink, D.R. (1977). “Advertising Increases Sensitivity to Price.”Journal of Advertising Research 17 (May), 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitra, A., Lynch, J.G. Advertising effects on consumer welfare: Prices paid and liking for brands selected. Market Lett 7, 19–29 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00557308

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00557308

Key words

Navigation