Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 1782–1786 | Cite as

An assessment of systematic errors in beam tests on brittle materials

  • F. S. Chau
  • P. Stanley
Papers

Abstract

In deriving the unit volume strength of brittle materials from beam bend test data, the shear and compressive stresses in the beam specimens are usually ignored. Depending on the span-to-depth ratio of the beam, these omissions may give rise to significant errors in the unit volume strength value, and in component failure probabilities derived from this strength value. In this paper, the effects of these systematic errors are considered for the 3-point beam as a function of span-to-depth ratio and for different values of the Weibull modulus. The relative errors are found to be small and conservative provided a sufficiently large span-to-depth ratio is used and the compressive/tensile strength ratio of the material is relatively high.

Keywords

Polymer Brittle Relative Error Test Data Systematic Error 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W. J. Weibull,J. Appl. Mech. 18 (1951) 293.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Stanley, H. Fessler andA. D. Sivill,Proc. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 22 (1973) 453.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Stanley, in Proceedings of the Symposium “Advances in Reliability Technology”, University of Bradford, 1976, ART 8/1.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Stanley, A. D. Sivill andH. Fessler,Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 190 (1976) 585.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Stanley, A. D. Sivill andH. Fessler,J. Strain Anal. 13 (1978) 103.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. H. Dukes, “Handbook of Brittle Material Design Technology”, AGARDograph no. 152 (1971).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. G. S. Davies,Proc. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 22 (1973) 429.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Timoshenko andD. H. Young, “Elements of Strength of Materials”, (Van Nostrand, New York, 1962).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Stanley, A. D. Sivill andH. Fessler, in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Experimental Stress Analysis, Udine, Italy, 1974, p. 2.42.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. R. Morton, “Numerical Approximation”, Library of Mathematics (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1964).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Topping, “Errors of Observation and Their Treatment”, 4th edn (Chapman and Hall, London, 1972).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. S. Chau
    • 1
  • P. Stanley
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Production EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Simon Engineering LaboratoriesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations