Reading and Writing

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 63–73 | Cite as

Fourth grade follow-up of reading and spelling skills of French immersion students

  • Hyla Rubin
  • Anne Turner
  • Miriam Kantor
Article

Abstract

Twenty-one French immersion and traditional English program students, originally assessed in first grade, were retested on single-word reading and spelling in fourth grade. The immersion students, who had shown equivalence with the control students on most written language measures in first grade, maintained their equivalence in fourth grade. Furthermore, they demonstrated slight superiority over the English program students in reading non-words. Their first-grade advantage in linguistic analysis ability may have helped their written English skills to develop comparably to those of the control subjects despite much less exposure to, and instruction in, written English. It is suggested that although no other advantage was seen at this time from their early heightened linguistic analysis ability, the French immersion subjects may surpass the English program students once they can join their linguistic analysis skill to greater expereince with written English.

Keywords

Bilingualism French immersion linguistic awareness reading spelling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BallE. W. and BlachmanB. A. 1988. Phoneme segmentation training: Effect on reading readiness.Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 208–225.Google Scholar
  2. BialystokE. 1986. Children's concept of word.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 13–32.Google Scholar
  3. BlachmanB. 1983. Are we assessing the linguistic factors critical in early reading?Annals of Dyslexia, 33, 91–109.Google Scholar
  4. BlachmanB. 1984. Language analysis skills and early reading acquisition. In G. P.Wallach and K.Butler (eds.),Language learning disabilities in school age children. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  5. BradleyL. and BryantP. E. 1983. Categorizing sounds and learning to read — A causal connection.Nature, 301, 419–421.Google Scholar
  6. FeldmanC. and ShenM. 1971. Some language-related cognitive advantages of bilingual five-year-olds.The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 118, 235–244.Google Scholar
  7. GallistelE. and EllisK. 1974.Gallistel-Ellis Test of Coding Skills. Hamden, CT: Montage Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. GeneseeF. 1974.An evaluation of the English writing skills of students in French immersion programs. Montreal: Protestant School Board of Greater Montreal (mimeo).Google Scholar
  9. GeneseeF. and StanleyM. H. 1976. The development of English writing skills in French immersion programs.Canadian Journal of Education, 1(3), 1–17.Google Scholar
  10. HarleyB., HartD., and LapkinS. 1986. The effects of early bilingual schooling on first language skills.Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 295–322.Google Scholar
  11. KendallJ. R., LajeunesseG., ChmilarP., ShapsonL. R., and ShapsonS. M. 1987. English reading skills of French immersion students in kindergarten and grades 1 and 2.Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 135–159.Google Scholar
  12. LambertW. E. and TuckerG. R. 1972.Bilingual education of children: The St. Lambert experiment. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  13. LambertW. E., TuckerG. R., and d'AnglejanA. 1973. Cognitive and attitudinal consequences of bilingual schooling: The St. Lambert Project through grade six.Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 141–159.Google Scholar
  14. LapkinS. 1979.The English writing skills of French immersion pupils at grade five. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (mimeo).Google Scholar
  15. LibermanI. Y., RubinH., DuquesS., and CarlisleJ. 1985. Linguistic abilities and spelling proficiency in kindergarteners and adult poor spellers. In D. B.Gray and J. F.Kavanagh (eds.),Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia. Parkton, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
  16. LibermanI. Y. and ShankweilerD. 1985. Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write.Remedial and Special Education, 6(6), 8–17.Google Scholar
  17. LibermanI. Y., ShankweilerD., FischerF. W., and CarterB. 1974. Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212.Google Scholar
  18. LundbergI., FrostJ., and PetersenO. 1988. Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children.Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–284.Google Scholar
  19. LundbergI., OlofssonA., and WallS. 1980. Reading and spelling skills in kindergarten.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 159–173.Google Scholar
  20. MannV. 1984. Longitudinal prediction and prevention of reading difficulty.Annals of Dyslexia, 34, 117–136.Google Scholar
  21. OliverE., CorlettC., and McKenzieC. 1976.Wellington County French immersion program — kindergarten and grade 1, 1975–1976.Google Scholar
  22. RosnerJ. 1971. The Auditory Analysis Test: An initial report.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 384–392.Google Scholar
  23. RubinH. and TurnerA. 1989. Linguistic awareness skills in grade one children in a French immersion setting.Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1, 73–86.Google Scholar
  24. ShapsonS. and KaufmanD. 1978. Overview of elementary French programs in British Columbia: Issues and research.Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 586–603.Google Scholar
  25. StanovichK. E. 1985. Explaining the variance in reading ability in terms of psychological processes: What have we learned?Annals of Dyslexia, 35, 67–96.Google Scholar
  26. SwainM. 1975. Writing skills of grade three French immersion pupils.Working Papers on Bilingualism, 7, 1–38.Google Scholar
  27. SwainM. and LapkinS. 1981.Bilingual education in Ontario: A decade of research. Toronto: Ministry of Education, Ontario.Google Scholar
  28. TunnerW. E. and MyhillM. 1984. Metalinguistic awareness and bilingualism. In W. E.Tunmer, C.Pratt, and M. L.Herriman (eds.),Metalinguistic awareness in children. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  29. ZifcakM. 1981. Phonological awareness and reading acquisition.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 114–126.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hyla Rubin
    • 1
  • Anne Turner
    • 2
  • Miriam Kantor
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate Department of Speech PathologyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Woodstock School BoardWoodstockCanada
  3. 3.Peel Board of EducationMississaugaCanada

Personalised recommendations