Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 20, Issue 11, pp 4084–4090 | Cite as

Surface damage of single-crystal silicon abraded in ethanol and deionized water

  • D. S. Lim
  • S. Danyluk
Papers

Abstract

Semiconductor grade, single-crystal silicon wafers of (1 0 0) p-type were abraded by a single-point, slow speed (2.3 cm sec−1) 90° pyramid diamond in ethanol and deionized water. The scratching was carried out in each of the fluids with a load of 0.5 N on the sliding diamond. The scratching produces a groove, the depth of which depends on the number of traverses of the diamond. A measure of the cross-sectional area of the groove was used to determine the abrasion rate in ethanol, which was about 1.3 times that in deionized water. Some of the samples scratched in deionized water were annealed at 1000° C for 1 h and these samples, along with those unannealed and scratched in both fluids, were fractured perpendicular to the scratch in a three-point bend apparatus. The fracture strengths and the mirror distances obtained by scanning electron microscope (SEM) observation were used to deduce tensile residual stresses of 15.6 and 99.0 MN m−2 beneath the grooves formed in deionized water and ethanol, respectively. The SEM investigation also showed that (a) the groove surfaces contained microcracks wedged with wear debris, and (b) dislocations were generated and propagated away from the groove surfaces as a result of annealing. The relatively higher tensile residual stress produced in the presence of ethanol is consistent with the higher wear rate in this fluid.

Keywords

Residual Stress Pyramid Wear Rate Silicon Wafer Fracture Strength 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K. Sumino, Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Silicon Materials and Technology, Semiconductor Silicon, Minneapolis, 1981 (Pennington, New Jersey, 1981), p. 208.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B. R. Lawn, D. B. Marshall andP. Chantikul,J. Mater. Sci. 16 (1981) 1769.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. P. Chen andM. H. Leipold,Amer. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 59 (1980) 469.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. G. Eremenko andV. I. Nikitenko,Phys. Status Solidi (a) 14 (1972) 317.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. R. Patel,J. Appl. Phys. 34 (1963) 2788.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Danyluk andR. Reaves,Wear 77 (1982) 81.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. V. Ravi, “Imperfections and Impurities in Semiconductor Silicon” (Wiley, New York, 1981) p. 17.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. P. Marden, (editor), “Silicon Device Processing” (NBS Special Publications No. 337, US Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C., 1970) p. 419.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. P. Chen,J. Electrochem. Soc. 129 (1982) 2835.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. W. Lee, D. S. Lim andS. Danyluk,J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 3 (1984) 651.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. J. Mecholsky, R. W. Rice andS. W. Frieman,J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 57 (1974) 440.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G. K. Bansal,Phil. Mag. 35 (1977) 935.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. J. Mecholsky andM. G. Drexhage,J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 63 (1980) 347.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. W. Freiman, A. C. Gonzalez andJ. J. Mecholsky,ibid. 62 (1979) 206.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. M. Gruver andH. P. Kirchner,ibid. 57 (1974) 220.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. C. Dash,J. Appl. Phys. 27 (1956) 1193.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. S. Lim
    • 1
  • S. Danyluk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Mechanics and MetallurgyUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations