Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 15, Issue 9, pp 2183–2191 | Cite as

Characterization and properties of controlled nucleation thermochemical deposition (CNTD)-silicon carbide

  • Sunil Dutta
  • Roy W. Rice
  • Henry C. Graham
  • Madan C. Mendiratta
Papers

Abstract

The present investigation was undertaken to characterize the microstructure of controlled nucleation thermochemical deposition (CNTD)-SiC material and to evaluate the room-temperature and high-temperature bend strength and oxidation resistance. Utilizing the CNTD process, ultrafine grained (0.01 to 0.1μm) SiC was deposited on W wires (0.5 mm diameter by 20cm long) as substrates. The deposited SiC rods had superior surface smoothness and were without any macrocolumnar growth commonly found in conventional CVD material. At both room and high temperature (1200 to 1380° C), the CNTD-SiC exhibited a bend strength of ~ 200 000 psi (1380 MPa), several times higher than that of hot-pressed, sintered, or CVD SiC. The excellent retention of strength at high temperature was attributed to the high purity and fine grain size of the SiC deposit and the apparent absence of grain growth at elevated temperatures. The rates of weight change for CNTD-SiC during oxidation were lower than for NC-203 (hot-pressed SiC), higher than for GE's CVD-SiC and CVD-Si3N4 but considerably below those for HS-130 (hot-pressed Si3N4). The high-purity fully dense and stable grain size CNTD-SiC material shows potential for high-temperature structural applications, however, problem areas might include scaling the process to make larger parts, deposition on removable substrates, and the possible residual tensile stress.

Keywords

Carbide Tensile Stress Oxidation Resistance Residual Tensile Stress Apparent Absence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    F. I. Baratta,Amer. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 57 (1978) 806.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. A. Holzl, ″Investigation of CNTD Mechanism and Its Effect on Microstructural Properties in Silicon Carbide″, Special Topical Report, Chemetal Corp., Pacoima, California, AFOSR; Contract No. F49620-77-C-0036, July (1977).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. W. Freiman, J. J. Mecholsky, W. J. McDonough andR. W. Rice, in ″Ceramics for High Performance Applications″, Vol. II, edited by J. J. Burke, E. N. Lenoe, and R. N. Katz, (Brook Hill, Chestnut Hill, Mass., 1977) pp. 1069–76.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. C. Larsen andG. C. Walther, Property Screening and Evaluation of Ceramic Turbine Engine Materials, in IITRI-D6114-ITR-36 (IIT Research Institute, Chicago, Illinois, 1978) p. 20.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Idem, Property Screening and Evaluation of Ceramic Turbine Engine Materials, IITRI-D6114-ITR-30 (IIT Research Institute, Chicago, Illinois, 1978).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. F. McLean, E. A. Fisher andR. J. Bratton, ″Brittle Materials Design, High Temperature Gas Turbine″, AMMRC-CTR-72-19 (Army Materials and Mechanics Research Center, Watertown, Mass., 1972) p. 109.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. C. Tripp andH. C. Graham,J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 59 (1976) 399.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. W. Hinze, W. C. Tripp andH. C. Graham, High Temperature Oxidation of Hot Pressed Silicon Carbide, in ″Mass Transport Phenomena in Ceramics″, Materials Science Research, Vol. 9, edited by A. R. Cooper and A. H. Heuer (Plenum Press, New York, 1975) pp. 409–19.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. C. Graham, Air Force Materials Laboratory, Wright Patterson AFB — Ohio, private communication, April, 1978.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. J. Gebhardt, R. A. Tanzilli andT. A. Harris,J. Electrochem. Soc. 123 (1976) 1678.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sunil Dutta
    • 1
  • Roy W. Rice
    • 2
  • Henry C. Graham
    • 3
  • Madan C. Mendiratta
    • 4
  1. 1.Lewis Research CenterClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Naval Research LaboratoryWashington, DCUSA
  3. 3.Air Force Materials LaboratoryWright Patterson Air Force BaseUSA
  4. 4.Systems Research LaboratoryDaytonUSA

Personalised recommendations