Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 26, Issue 23, pp 6501–6506 | Cite as

Effects of composition on selected physical properties of SiO2-K2O-Na2O glasses

  • D. W. Jones
  • A. S. Rizkalla
  • J. A. Johnson
  • E. J. Sutow
Papers

Abstract

Physical properties were used to characterize a range of five, three-component glass formulations (SiO2-K2O-Na2O) synthesized from spray-dried precursor powders in terms of their final bulk chemical compositions. Five specimens per composition were produced by mixing dry glass powder with methyl alcohol to form a slurry, then shaping the slurry in a cylindrical mould, using conventional methods. Specimens were fired under vacuum. Optimum firing conditions for each glass were determined by selecting holding times which produced the maximum Young's modulus. Fracture toughness, KIC, values ranged from 0.92–0.99 MPa m1/2 and Young's modulus, E, values ranged from 45.09–58.06 GPa. Linear regression analyses showed significant correlations between chemical composition and fusion temperature (n=5; P<0.001), opacity (n=5; P <0.01), specific gravity (n=5; P<0.02), dynamic Young's modulus (n=5; P<0.01) and fracture toughness (n=30; P<0.001). The selected physical properties were found to be very sensitive to small variations in chemical composition.

Keywords

Fracture Toughness Specific Gravity Glass Formulation Glass Powder Firing Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D. W. Jones, E. J. Sutow, H. W. King, A. S. Rizkalla and G. C. Hall, J. Can. Ceram. Soc. 55 (1986) 42.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. S. Rizkalla, D. W. Jones, G. C. Hall, H. W. King and E. J. Sutow, Br. Ceram. Trans. J. 90 (1991) 1.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. J. Kreidl, “Inorganic Glass-Forming Systems”, in “Glass Science and Technology”, Vol. 1, edited by D. R. Uhlman and N. J. Kreidl (Academic Press, New York, 1983) pp. 107–260.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hunterlab Instruction Manual, Model D25A-g, Hunterlab Association Lab Inc., Reston, Virginia (1922).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. S. Rizkalla, D. W. Jones, G. C. Hall, H. W. King and E. J. Sutow, J. Can. Ceram. Soc. 56 (1987) 39.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. W. Jones, A. S. Rizkalla, H. W. King and E. J. Sutow, ibid. 57 (1988) 39.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. W. Jones, A. S. Rizkalla and E. J. Sutow, Mater. Sci. Engng A105/106 (1988) 207.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. E. Kinsler, A. R. Frey, A. B. Coppens and J. V. Sanders, “Fundamentals of Acoustics”, 3rd Edn (Wiley, New York, 1982) p. 461.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. S. Rizkalla, PhD thesis, Technical University of Nova Scotia, Halifax (1987).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. T. Morrison and N. N. Boyd, “Organic Chemistry”, 3rd Edn (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA, 1973) p. 526.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Soga and O. Anderson, J. Geophys. Res. 72 (1965) 1733.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. H. van Vlack, “lastic Behaviour of Solids”, in “Materials Science for Engineers” (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1971) pp. 188–207.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. W. Jones
    • 1
  • A. S. Rizkalla
    • 1
  • J. A. Johnson
    • 1
  • E. J. Sutow
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Dental Biomaterials Science, Department of Applied Oral Sciences, Faculty of DentistryDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations