Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 1085–1096 | Cite as

The durability of glass fibre cement-the effect of fibre length and content

  • A. J. Majumdar
  • B. Singh
  • A. A. Langley
  • M. A. Ali


The properties of glass reinforced cement composites (grc) containing 2–8 vol % of alkali resistant glass fibres of lengths 10–40 mm have been studied for periods of up to 5 years in various environments. Fibre volume fraction was found to be an important factor influencing the strength of grc at all ages, while fibre length was of decreasing significance as storage periods in wet environments increased. In relatively dry conditions, little change with time of bending, tensile or impact strengths was observed, but the matrix cracking stress was reduced. In wet environments, the cracking stress tended to increase but the ultimate strength to decrease.

At 28 days maximum strength was achieved with composites having 6 to 8 vol % fibre 30 to 40 mm long. Composites with similar formulations were found to have the greater strength after 5 years' storage but, after water storage or natural weathering a strength reduction had occurred. Bending strength was approximately 70% to 86% of its 28 day value, tensile strength between 55% and 84% and impact strength 32% to 78%. Young's modulus is largely dependent upon the degree of hydration of the cement matrix and in the long-term was greater for water-stored material than for that stored in dry air.


Tensile Strength Glass Fibre Impact Strength Water Storage Ultimate Strength 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. Young, “Designing with GRC” (Architectural Press, London, 1978).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. H. Cross (editor), “Proceedings of the International Congress on Glass Fibre Reinforced Cement, Brighton, October 1977” (The Glass Fibre Reinforced Cement Association, Buckinghamshire, UK, 1977).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    “A study of the properties of Cem-FIL/OPC composites”, BRE Current Paper CP 38/76 (1976).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    “GRC”, BRE Digest 216, 1978.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. A. Ali, A. J. Majumdar and B. Singh, J. Mater. Sci. 10 (1975) 1732.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. R. Steele, “Prospects for fibre reinforced construction materials”, Conference Proceedings of International Building Exhibition (Building Research Station, London, 1971) BRE Current Paper CP 17/72.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Singh, P. L. Walton and M. S. Stucke, “Testing and test methods of fibre cement composites” in RILEM Symposium Proceedings, Sheffield 5–7 April 1978, edited by R. N. Swamy (Construction Press, Lancaster, 1978) p. 377.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Aveston, G. A. Cooper and A. Kelly, “The properties of fibre composites”, Paper 1, Conference Proceedings National Physical Laboratory (IPC, London, 1971) p. 15.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. F. Green, D. R. Oakley and B. A. Proctor, “Testing and test methods of fibre cement composites” in RILEM Symposium Proceedings, Sheffield 5–7 April 1978, edited by R. N. Swamy (Construction Press, Lancaster, 1978) p. 439.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Aveston, R. A. Mercer and J. M. Sillwood, “Composites — standard testing and design”, Conference Proceedings National Physical Laboratory 8–9 April 1974 (IPC, London, 1974) p. 93.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. S. Stucke and A. J. Majumdar, J. Mater. Sci. 11 (1976) 1019.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. A. Proctor, Composites 9 (1978) 44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. J. Majumdar
    • 1
  • B. Singh
    • 1
  • A. A. Langley
    • 1
  • M. A. Ali
    • 1
  1. 1.Building Research EstablishmentGarstonUK

Personalised recommendations