Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 7, Issue 9, pp 1030–1036 | Cite as

The use of a torsion machine to measure the shear strength and modulus of unidirectional carbon fibre reinforced plastic composites

  • N. L. Hancox
Papers

Abstract

A torsion apparatus, in which a solid rod specimen is subjected to a shear stress field only, has been used to measure the shear modulus and strength of unidirectional carbon fibre reinforced plastics. Because of the absence of tensile and compressive forces, a more accurate value of the shear strength is obtained than from a test such as the short beam shear test. The shear strength is calculated allowing for the non-linear nature of the shear stress-strain characteristic. For type 2 treated fibre the shear modulus is found to increase rapidly with fibre volume loading, in reasonable agreement with the micromechanical theory of Heaton. For type 2 untreated and type 1 treated fibre composites, a slightly less rapid increase in shear modulus is noted. Results for type 1 untreated fibre composites increase with volume loading but are below both the other results and the theoretical curve. The shear strength of composite materials made from type 2 treated fibre is greater than that of the pure resin, and has a maximum for about 50% volume of fibre. For type 1 and untreated carbon fibres the shear strength decreases with increasing volume loading. By using the concepts of fracture mechanics and assuming that the bond between type 2 treated fibre and resin is completely effective, so that failure starts in the matrix, it is possible to give a plausible explanation of the shear strength results. The shear modulus, but not the shear strength, can be measured accurately, using either square or circular cross-section specimens.

Keywords

Shear Strength Shear Modulus Fibre Composite Volume Loading Treated Fibre 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    N. L. Hancox and H. Wells, ASTM Symposium on Carbon Composites, Albuquerque, N. Mexico, 29–30 January 1970.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. N. Reynolds and N. L. Hancox, Brit. J. Phys. D. 4 (1971) 1747.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Bowes, To be published 1972.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Kittel, “Introduction to Solid State Physics” (Wiley, New York, 1956).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. F. S. Hearmon, “An Introduction to Applied Anisotropic Elasticity” (Oxford University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Timoshenko and D. H. Young, “Elements of Strength of Materials” (Van Nostrand, New Jersey, 1962).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Nadai, “Plasticity” (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1931) p. 126–128.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Timoshenko and J. W. Goodier, “Theory of Elasticity” (McGraw Hill, New York, 1951).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. E. H. Love, “A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity” (Cambridge University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. D. Heaton, Brit. J. Phys. D. Series 2, 1 (1968) 1039; 3 (1970) 672 and private communication.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. F. Adams and R. L. Thomas, Textile Res. J. 19 (1969) 339.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. C. Novak, “Composite Materials”, ASTM STP460 (1969) pp. 540–549.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. N. Reynolds, private communication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd. 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. L. Hancox
    • 1
  1. 1.Process Technology DivisionUKAEAHarwellUK

Personalised recommendations