Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 115–123 | Cite as

Amplitude-independent mechanical damping in alkali halides

  • W. H. Robinson
Papers

Abstract

At present there are two theories which are used to explain the observed amplitude-independent mechanical damping (internal friction) in alkali halides. In the theory of Granato and Lücke it is assumed that the damping constant, B, results from the dislocation interacting with phonons, while in the theory of Robinson and Birnbaum, the assumption is made that the dislocation drag is caused by charged dislocations, interacting with their compensating charge clouds. Both these theories predict a peak in the damping at a frequency of ∼ 10 MHz but the peak in the R-B theory is far less sharp than that in the G-L theory.

In this paper the MHz results of Suzuki, Ikushima, and Aoki for room temperature and the MHz results of Mitchell taken at 77 and 298 K are, together with some kHz results, compared with the two theories. It is shown that both the theories are able to explain the effect of temperature and irradiation but that the theory of Granato and Lücke does not fit the kHz results as well as the theory of Robinson and Birnbaum. The phonon damping analysis gives a change in B of a factor of 14 between the LiF specimens of Suzuki et al and Mitchell while for the charge cloud analysis the charges on the dislocations within the LiF specimen differ only by 20%.

It is concluded that the charge cloud damping theory with a damping constant as a function of frequency fits the experimental results better than the present phonon damping theory which has a damping constant not dependent on frequency.

Keywords

Polymer Halide Internal Friction Charge Cloud Cloud Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    O. M. Mracek Mitchell, J. Appl. Phys. 35 (1965) 2083.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Suzuki, A. Ikushima, and M. Aoki, Acta Metallurgica 12 (1964) 1231.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. H. Robinson and H. K. Birnbaum, J. Appl. Phys. 37 (1966) 3754.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. L. Kliewer and J. S. Koehler, Phys. Rev. A. 157 (1967) 685.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Granato and K. Lücke, J. Appl. Phys. 27 (1956) 583, 789.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Leibfried, Z. Physik 127 (1950) 344.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. P. Mason, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 32 (1960) 458.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. A. Bielig and H. F. Pollard, IPPS Conference on the Science of Materials, New Zealand DSIR (1969) 104.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. D. Eshelby, C. W. A. Newey, and P. L. Pratt, Phil. Mag. 3 (1958) 75.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. H. Robinson, IPPS Conference on the Science of Materials, New Zealand DSIR (1969) 113.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. M. Brown, Phys. Stat. Sol. 1 (1961) 585.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. H. Robinson, New Zealand Physics and Engineering Lab, Tech. Note 219 (1970).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. H. Robinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Scientific and Industrial ResearchPhysics and Engineering LaboratoryWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations