Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 34–39 | Cite as

Initial dislocation distributions in tungsten fibre-copper composites

  • K. K. Chawla
  • M. Metzger
Papers

Abstract

Etch-pit studies of composites consisting of small volume fractions of tungsten wires into which a copper matrix had been introduced by vacuum infiltration showed the dislocation density in the single crystal matrix to increase with volume fraction of fibre and to rise to high values toward the fibre-matrix interface. The dislocation distributions, which resulted from strains arising due to differential shrinkage, were interpreted in terms of a contribution, independent of fibre fraction, due to transverse strains which fall off with distance from the fibre and a second one due to axial strain which increases with fibre fraction but is invariant with distance from the fibre. Part of the axial adjustment is accomplished by interface shear.

Keywords

Copper Tungsten Shrinkage Dislocation Density Small Volume 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. R. Hancock, J. Composite Materials 1 (1967) 136.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. R. Hancock and J. C. Grosskreutz, Metal Matrix Composites, ASTM STP 438 (1968) 134.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. R. Pinnel and A. Lawley, Met. Trans. AIME 1 (1970) 1337.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Garmong and L. A. Shepard, ibid 2 (1971) 175.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. W. Young and J. R. Savage, J. Appl. Phys. 35 (1964) 1971.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. W. Mitchell, J. C. Chevrier, B. J. Hockey, and J. P. Monaghan, jr. Canad. J. Phys. 45 (1967) 453.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. K. N. Reddy and H. Wilman, Trans. Inst. Metal Finishing 36 (1959) 97.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. D. Livingston, Acta Metallurgica 10 (1962) 229.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Poritsky, Physics 5 (1934) 406.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. W. Hull and E. E. Burger, ibid 5 (1934) 384.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Kelly and G. J. Davies, Metallurgical Reviews 10 (1965) 1.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Lankford, Jr. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois, 1969.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Kellyand H. Lilholt, Phil. Mag. 20 (1969) 311.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. K. Chawla
    • 1
  • M. Metzger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Metallurgy and Mining Engineering and Materials Research LaboratoryUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations