Summary
Sixty-nine patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), radiculopathy (CSR), or both (CSMR) were studied with computed tomography (CT). Computer-assisted myelography (CAM) accurately determines the site and nature of spondylotic protrusions and provides good visualisation of the subarachnoid space and cord deformities even in areas with dilute metrizamide. However, excessive vertebral movement and bulging ligamenta flava with their effects on cord deformity, so easily visualised in myelograms, are completely or partially missed. In the assessment of CSM, metrizamide myelography (MM) followed by CAM should be performed, particularly when the myelographic images are unsatisfactory due to contrast dilution or blockage, when cord compression cannot be ascertained with MM and when cord atrophy is suspected. In CSR, the diagnostic information from MM and CAM is comparable. The diagnostic criteria in CAM are, however, less direct and since MM is adequate in uncomplicated cases, CAM is generally not necessary. The APD, APD/TD ratio, area and circularity are sensitive indices of cord deformity and the first two should be used more often to assist visual assessment of cord deformity. The relation between cord parameters and treatment response is better reflected in CSM cases managed conservatively and the results suggest that the degree of cord deformity is helpful in determining the outcome and hence the choice between surgical and conservative treatment. In plain CT, the osteophytes and calcified discs are adequately visualised and canal dimensions measured with accuracy, but the cervical cord and roots cannot be properly assessed and the diagnosis of CSM or CSR cannot be ascertained. At present, its role in cervical spondylosis is therefore limited.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Post MJD (1980) Computed tomography of the spine: its values and limitations on a non-high resolution scanner. In: Post MJD (ed) Radiographic evaluation of the spine. Masson, New York, pp 186–258
Post MJD (1980) CT update: the impact of time, metrizamide, and high resolution on the diagnosis of spinal pathology. In: Post MJD (ed) Radiographic evaluation of the spine. Masson, New York, pp 259–294
Pullicino P (1980) The visualisation of the spinal cord by computed tomography and its place in the assessment of patients with spinal cord pathology: a study based on the EMI CT 5005 scanner. PhD Thesis, University of London
Irvine DH, Foster JB, Newell DJ, Klukvin BN (1965) Prevalence of cervical spondylosis in general practice. Lancet I: 1089–1092
Wilkinson M (1960) The morbid anatomy of cervical spondylosis and myelopathy. Brain 83: 589–616
Grykholm R (1951) Cervical nerve root compression resulting from disc degeneration and root sleeve fibrosis. A clinical investigation. Acta Chir Scand [Suppl] 160: 1–149
Brain R, Northfield D, Wilkinson M (1952) Neurological manifestations of cervical spondylosis. Brain 75: 187–225
Di Chiro G, Schellinger D (1976) Computed tomography of spinal cord after lumbar intrathecal introduction of metrizamide (computer-assisted myelography). Radiology 120: 101–104
Coin CG, Chan YS, Keranen V, Pennink M (1977) Computer assisted myelography in disk disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1: 398–404
Sartor K (1980) Computed tomography of the cervical spine and spinal cord. Ann Radiol (Paris) 23: 245–247
Van der Tas C (1979) Computer-assisted myelography in degenerative abnormalities of the cervical vertebral column. Diagn Imag Clin Med (Basel) 48: 32–40
Miyasaka K, Isu T, Iwasaki Y, Abe S, Takei H, Tsurn M (1983) High resolution computed tomography in the diagnosis of cervical disc disease. Neuroradiology 24: 253–257
Scotti G, Scialfa G, Pieralli S, Boccardi E, Valsecchi F, Tenon C (1983) Myelopathy and radiculopathy due to cervical spondylosis: myelographic — CT correlations. AJNR 4: 601–603
Nakagawa H, Okumura T, Sugiyama T, Iwata K (1983) Discrepancy between metrizamide CT and myelography in diagnosis of cervical disc protrusions. AJNR 4: 604–606
Baleriaux D, Noterman J, Ticket L (1983) Recognition of cervical soft disc herniation by contrast-enhanced CT. AJNR 4: 607–608
Russell EJ, D'Angelo CM, Zimmerman RD, Czervionke LF, Huckman MS (1984) Cervical disc herniation: CT demonstration after contrast enhancement. Radiology 152: 703–712
Daniels DL, Grogan JP, Johansen JG, Meyer GA, Williams AL, Haughton VM (1984) Cervical radiculopathy: computed tomography and myelography compared. Radiology 151: 109–113
Yu YL, Stevens JM, Kendall B, du Boulay GH (1983) Cord shape and measurements in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. AJNR 4: 839–842
Seibert CE, Barnes JE, Dreisbach JN, Swanson WB, Heck RJ (1981) Accurate CT measurement of the spinal cord using metrizamide: physical factors. AJNR 2: 75–78
Yu YL, du Boulay GH, Stevens JM, Kendall BE (1985) Morphology and measurements of the cervical spinal cord in computer-assisted myelography. Neuroradiology 27: 399–402
Payne EE, Spillane JD (1957) The cervical spine. An anatomico-pathological study of 70 specimens (using a special technique) with particular reference to the problem of cervical spondylosis. Brain 80: 571–596
Yu YL (1984) Management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Lancet I: 170–171
Ono K, Ota H, Tada K, Yamamoto T (1977) Cervical myelopathy secondary to multiple spondylotic protrusions. A clinicopathologic study. Spine 2: 109–125
Ogino H, Tada K, Okada K, Yonenobu K, Yamamoto T, Ono K, Namiki H (1983) Canal diameter, anteroposterior compression ratio and spondylotic myelopathy of the cervical spine. Spine 8: 1–15
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, Y.L., du Boulay, G.H., Stevens, J.M. et al. Computed tomography in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy: visualisation of structures, myelographic comparison, cord measurements and clinical utility. Neuroradiology 28, 221–236 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00548196
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00548196