Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond the Guidelines: Practical lessons for monitoring

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of workshops have provided extensive feedback on a recently published manual, Monitoring Guidelines to Evaluate Effects of Forestry Activities on Streams in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska (Guidelines) (MacDonald et al., 1991). These workshops and other discussions have led to the identification of fourteen additional ‘lessons’ for monitoring. These lessons are concepts which either were not incorporated into the Guidelines, were not sufficiently emphasized, or which are needed to put the Guidelines in context. The topics include: monitoring as a continuum; defining objectives and hypotheses; peer review; uncertainty and risk; upslope vs. instream monitoring; photo sequences; scale considerations; data storage, data interpretation, and data base management; ‘activities monitoring’; and personal commitment as a critical component in monitoring projects. Many of these lessons might appear self-evident, but our experience indicates that they are often ignored. Like the Guidelines, these lessons are widely applicable and should be explicitly recognized when formulating and conducting monitoring projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benda, L.: 1990, ‘The Influence of Debris Flows on Channels and Valley Floors in the Oregon Coast Range, U.S.A.’, Earth Surf. Proc. and Landforms 15, 457–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, C.: 1989, ‘Effects of Vegetation and Land Use on Channel Morphology’. In: Gresswell, R.E. (Ed.), Riparian Resource Management, U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Billings, Montana, pp. 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, P.: 1991, ‘Biomonitoring and Environmental Management’, Envir. Monit. and Assess. 14, 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA: 1986, Quality Criteria for Water: 1986, EPA 440/5-86-001, Office of Water Regulations and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA: 1988, Introduction to Water Quality Standards. EPA 440/5-88-089, Office of Water Regulation and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA: 1989, Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Rivers: Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish. EPA/444/4-89-001, Office of Water Regulation and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA: 1990, Biological Criteria. EPA-440/5-90-004, Office of Water Regulation and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, B.: 1990, ‘An Approximation for the Bank Storage Effect’, Water Resour. Res. 26 (11), 2769–2775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkle, S., Johnson, W.S., and Flora, M.: 1987, Monitoring Stream Water for Land Use Impacts: A Training Manual for Natural Resource Management Specialists. International Forestry, U.S. Forest Service, and International Park Affairs, U.S. National Park Service, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lisle, T.E.: 1982, ‘Effects of Aggradation and Degradation on Riffle-Pool Morphology in Natural Gravel Channels, Northwestern California’, Water Resour. Res. 18 (6), 1643–1651.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, L.H.: 1989, ‘Cumulative Watershed Effects: The Implications of Scale’, poster paper presented at Fall Meeting, Amer. Geo. Un., San Francisco, CA. Abstract in Eos 70 (43), 1114–1115.

  • MacDonald, L.H.: 1992, ‘Sediment Monitoring: Reality and Hope’, invited paper presented at the EPA/U.S. Forest Service Technical Workshop on Sediments, Feb. 3–7, Corvallis, OR. In press.

  • MacDonald, L.H., Smart, A., and Wissmar, R.C.: 1991, Monitoring Guidelines to Evaluate Effects of Forestry Activities on Streams in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska. EPA/910/9-91-001, NPS Section, U.S. EPA Region 10, Seattle, WA. 166 pp.

  • Megahan, W.F.: 1982, ‘Channel Sediment Storage Behind Obstructions in Forested Drainage Basins Draining the Granitic Bedrock of the Idaho Batholith’. In: Swanson, F.J., et al. (Eds.), Sediment Budgets and Routing in Forested Drainage Basins, USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-141, Portland, OR, pp. 114–121.

  • Megahan, W.F., Potyondy, J.P., and Seyedbagheri, K.A.: 1992, ‘Best Management Practices and Cumulative Effects from Sedimentation in the South Fork Salmon River: An Idaho Case Study’. In: Naiman, R. (Ed.), New Perspectives for Watershed Management, Springer-Verlag, N.Y., pp. 399–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce, S.L.: 1980a, Water Quality Monitoring Programs. USDA Forest Service Tech. Pap. WSDG-TP-00002. Fort Collins, CO. 66 pp.

  • Ponce, S.L.: 1980b, Statistical Methods Commonly Used in Water Quality Data Analysis. USDA Forest Service Tech. Pap. WSDG-TP-00001. Fort Collins, CO. 136 pp.

  • Swanson, F.J., Benda, L.E., Duncan, S.H., Grant, G.E., Megahan, W.F., Reid, L.M., and Ziemer, R.R.: 1987, ‘Mass Failures and Other Processes of Sediment Production in Pacific Northwest Forest Landscapes’. In: Salo, E.O. and Cundy, T.W. (Eds.), Streamside Management: Forestry and Fisheries Interactions, Contr. No. 57, Inst. of Forest Resources, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA, pp. 9–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walling, D.E. and Webb, B.W.: 1981, ‘The Reliability of Suspended Sediment Load Data’. In: Erosion and Sediment Transport Measurement, Int. Assoc. of Hydrol. Sci. Publ. No. 133, Wallingford, England, pp. 177–194.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macdonald, L.H., Smart, A. Beyond the Guidelines: Practical lessons for monitoring. Environ Monit Assess 26, 203–218 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00547499

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00547499

Keywords

Navigation