Skip to main content

Monitoring the urban forest: Case studies and evaluations

Abstract

Urban forestry is a new science, with monitoring techniques that are still evolving. Tree inventory is most commonly practiced, but we are learning to better monitor the benefits and liabilities provided by urban trees. These results are often for political, social, and biological purposes. Although most monitoring is done at the project or local level, examples of state and national projects are given. Quality control procedures are infrequently used, but could substantially improve the accuracy of data collected.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Anonymous: 1982, Municipal Tree Management. Urban Data Service, Volume 14, Number 1. Washington, D.C.: International City Management Association, 14 pp.

  2. Anonymous: 1976, Managing Urban Trees. Urban Data Service Reports, Volume 8, Number 11, 14 pp.

  3. Bartsch, D., Hook, J., Prince, E. and Schrom, D.: 1985, ‘Using Computer Simulation to Plan a Sustained Yield Urban Forest’, J. For. 83, 372–375.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bassett, J.R.: 1978, ‘Vegetation Inventories: Needs and Uses’, Proc. Natl. Urban For. Conf. November 13–16, 1978. Washington, D.C., pp. 632–644.

  5. Bernhardt, E. and Swiecki, T.: 1988, ‘The State of Urban Forestry in California’. Prepared for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Urban Forestry Program, 68 pp.

  6. Downie, A.M.: 1988, ‘Firmly Planted’, CADalyst 5, 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hathout, S. and Simpson, K.: 1986, ‘Boulevard Tree Studies from Aerial Photographs of Winnipeg City, Manitoba, Canada’, J. Env. Management 23, 203–214.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson, C., Baker, F.A. and Johnson, W.: 1990, Urban and Community Forestry: A Guide for the Interior Western States. USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Region, Ogden, UT, 215 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kelsey, P.D. and Hootman, R.G.: 1988, ‘Soil and Tree Resource Inventories for Campus Landscapes’, J. Arboric. 14, 243–249.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kielbaso, J.J.: 1990, ‘Trends and Issues in City Forests’, J. Arboric. 16, 69–76.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Laut, J.G.: 1978, ‘Detection of Insect and Disease Conditions: A Necessity for Urban Forest Inventories’, Proc. Natl. Urban For. Conf. November 13–16, 1978. Washington, D.C., pp. 645–649.

  12. Lindhult, M.S. and Ryan, H.D.P., III: ‘Street Tree Management: The Next Generation’, Arbor Age 7, 13–20.

  13. Majerus, K.A.: 1988, Urban Forest Management: Guidelines for Planning and Administration, University of Illinois, Department of Forestry, 46 pp.

  14. Mohai, P., Smith, L., Valentine, F., Stiteler, W., Elias, T. and Westfall, R.: 1976, ‘Structure of Urban Street Tree Populations and Sampling Designs for Estimating their Parameters’, METRIA : 1, Proc. First Conf. of the Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance, pp. 28–43.

  15. Schroeder, H.W.: 1990, ‘Perceptions and Preferences of Urban Forest Users’, J. Arboric. 16, 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smiley, E.T.: 1988, ‘Test Your Town's Trees’, Am. For. 94, 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smiley, E.T. and Baker, F.A.: 1988, ‘Options in Street Tree Inventories’, J. Arboric. 14, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tate, R.L.: 1985, ‘Uses of Street Tree Inventory Data’, J. Arboric. 11, 210–213.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Paper No. 4373 of the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, U.S.A.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baker, F.A. Monitoring the urban forest: Case studies and evaluations. Environ Monit Assess 26, 153–163 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00547493

Download citation

Keywords

  • Quality Control
  • Environmental Management
  • Local Level
  • Control Procedure
  • Urban Forest