Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 247–256 | Cite as

Ambient air concentrations of PCDDs, PCDFs, coplanar PCBs, and PAHs at the Mississippi Sandhill Crane National Wildlife Refuge, Jackson County, Mississippi

  • Donald H. White
  • Joe W. Hardy
Article

Abstract

Our objective was to determine the levels of selected airborne contaminants in ambient air at the Mississippi Sandhill Crane National Wildlife Refuge, Mississippi, that might be affecting the health of endangered cranes living there. Two high-volume air samplers were operated at separate locations on the Refuge during May–September 1991. The sampling media were micro-quartz filters in combination with polyurethane foam plugs. Composite bimonthly samples from each station were analyzed for polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), dibenzofurans (PCDFs), coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Overall, residue concentrations were low. The toxic PCDD isomer 2,3,7,8-tetra-CDD was not detected, nor was penta-CDD. There was no difference (P>0.05) in residue concentrations between stations or over time and meteorological parameters were not correlated with residue concentrations. Because contaminant levels and patterns may differ seasonally, we recommend that air samples collected during winter months also be analyzed for these same chemical groups.

Keywords

Foam PAHs Polyurethane PCBs Biphenyl 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. California Air Resources Board: 1988, ‘Determination of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin (PCDD), polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDF), and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) emissions from stationary sources’, Sacramento, CA, 105 pp.Google Scholar
  2. California Air Resources Board: 1989, ‘Determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) emissions from stationary sources’, Sacramento, CA, 88 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Couvillion, C.E., McCoy, C.P., Jackson, J.R., and Bennett, L.W.: 1991, ‘Survey for carcinogenic mycotoxins in foods used by Mississippi sandhill cranes’, Mississippi State Univ., College of Vet. Med., 21 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Czuczwa, J.M. and Hites, R.A.: 1986, ‘Airborne dioxins and dibenzofurans: sources and fates’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 20, 195–200.Google Scholar
  5. Edgerton, S.A., Czuczwa, J.M., and Rench, J.D.: 1989, ‘Ambient air concentrations of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in Ohio: sources and health risk assessment’, Chemosphere 18, 1713–1730.Google Scholar
  6. Eisler, R.: 1987, ‘Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: a synoptic review’, U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv. Biol. Rep. 85(1.11), 81 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Hunt, G.T. and Maisel, B.E.: 1990, ‘Atmospheric PCDDs/PCDFs in wintertime in a northeastern U.S. urban coastal environment’, Chemosphere, 20, 1455–1462.Google Scholar
  8. Jacob, J.: 1983, ‘Carcinogenic impact from automobile exhaust condensate and the dependence of the PAH-profile on various parameters’, in: Rondia, D. (Ed.), Mobile Source Emissions Including Polycyclic Organic Species, D. Reidel Publishing Co., pp. 101–104.Google Scholar
  9. Lewis, R.G. and Jackson, M.D.: 1982, ‘Modification and evaluation of a high-volume air sampler for pesticides and semivolatile industrial organic chemicals’, Anal. Chem. 54, 592.Google Scholar
  10. Rogers, B., Wiersema, J., Price, J., Shevlin, C., Porter, T., Dean, G., Driscoll, T., Gise, J., Jenks, M., Kilpatrick, K., Lindgren, J., McCauley, C., Panketh, J., Smith, V., Sullivan, D., and Zarr, N.: 1988, ‘Final report: Gulf Coast community exposure study’, Texas Air Control Board, Austin, TX, 52 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Smith, R.M., O'Keefe, P.W., Aldous, K.M., Valente, H., Connor, S.P., and Donnelly, R.J.: 1990, ‘Chlorinated dibenzofurans and dioxins in atmospheric samples from cities in New York’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 24, 1502–1506.Google Scholar
  12. Steer, P., Tashiro, C., Clement, R., Lusis, M., and Reiner, E.: 1990, ‘Ambient air sampling of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans in Ontario: preliminary results’, Chemosphere 20, 10–12.Google Scholar
  13. Tiernan, T.O., Wagel, D.J., VanNess, G.F., Garrett, J.H., Solch, J.G., and Harden, L.A.: 1989, ‘PCDD/PCDF in the ambient air of a metropolitan area in the U.S.’, Chemosphere 19, 541–546.Google Scholar
  14. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: 1991, ‘Sixth annual report on carcinogens summary’, Technical Resources, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC, 459 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Wagel, D.J., Tiernan, T.O., Taylor, M.L., Garett, J.H., VanNess, G.F., Solch, J.G., and Harden, L.A.: 1989, ‘Assessments of ambient air sampling techniques for collecting airborne polyhalogenated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDD), dibenzofurans (PCDF) and biphenyls (PCB)’, Chemosphere 18, 177–184.Google Scholar
  16. White, D.H., Rice, C.P., Hoffman, D.J., and Gee, G.F.: 1994, ‘Environmental contaminants in nonviable eggs of the endangered Mississippi sandhill crane (Grus canadensis pulla)’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 31:225–232.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald H. White
    • 1
  • Joe W. Hardy
    • 2
  1. 1.U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Survey, Warnell School of Forest ResourcesThe University of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Mississippi Sandhill Crane National Wildlife RefugeU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceGautierUSA

Personalised recommendations