Skip to main content
Log in

The turnover of milkweed pollinia on bumble bees, and implications for outcrossing

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Bumble bees (Bombus spp.) picked up a pollen packet (pollinium) of milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.) every 2–5 h, usually more rapidly on their feet than on their mouthparts. Pollinia were retained an average of slightly over one day on the mouthparts and one-quarter day on the feet. This long retention period enhances the possibility of outcrossing in this largely or completely self-incompatible species. Although many more pollinia were carried on the feet, the longer retention of those on the mouthparts resulted in their collective outcrossing potential exceeding that of pollinia on the feet. Once pollinia became attached to the bees (via their attachment mechanisms, the corpuscula), others often attached to the translator arms (connecting corpusculum with pollinia) of the first pollinia. Long strings of pollinia and corpuscula often resulted, but they frequently were shed down to a single corpusculum, which was usually retained for long periods (estimated retention time=12–43 days). During the middle and latter part of the flowering period about two-thirds of the bees' feet carried only a single corpusculum. Feet in this condition picked up extremely few pollinia and thus were largely unavailable as sites for pollen transfer. Having several single corpuscula on the feet greatly lowered the number of pollinia carried by a bee over the season. Single corpuscula occurred much less frequently on the mouthparts and were shed over 25 times as rapidly as those on the feet. Many more bumble bees moved between clones than did other possible diurnal pollinators, largely a result of being several times more abundant than all other visitors combined. This factor, plus their heavy pollinia load, suggests that they were the most important diurnal pollinators of these clones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bertin RI, Willson MF (1980) Effectiveness of diurnal and nocturnal pollination of two milkweeds. Can J Bot 58:1744–1746

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankie GW, Opler PA, Bawa KS (1976) Foraging behaviour of solitary bees: implications for outcrossing of a neotropical forest tree species. J Ecol 64:1049–1057

    Google Scholar 

  • Free JB, Butler CG (1959) Bumblebees. Collins London

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel SN (1976) Restricted pollen flow of two woodland herbs determined by neutron-activation analysis. Nature 260:422–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1979) “Majoring” and “minoring” by foraging bumblebees, Bombus vagans: an experimental analysis. Ecology 60:245–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA, Berube D (1972) Pholox and Colias: the efficiency of a pollination system. Evolution 26:242–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA, Kerster HW (1974) Gene flow in seed plants. Evol Biol 7:139–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Linhart YB (1973) Ecological and behavioral determinants of pollen dispersal in hummingbird-pollinated Heliconia. Amer Natur 107:511–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch SP (1977) The floral ecology of Asclepias solanoana Woods. Madroño 24:159–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Macior LW (1965) Insect adaptation and behavior in Asclepias pollination. Bull Torrey Bot Club 92:114–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse DH (1977) Resource partitioning in bumblebees: the role of behavioral factors. Science 197:678–680

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse DH (1981a) Modification of bumblebee foraging: the effect of milkweed pollinia. Ecology 62:89–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse DH (1981b) Prey capture by the crab spider Misumena vatia (Clerck) (Thomisidae) on three common native flowers. Amer Midl Natur 105:358–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse DH, Fritz RS (in press) Experimental and observational studies of patch choice at three scales by the crab spider Misumena vatia. Ecology

  • Reincke DC, Bloom WL (1979) Pollen dispersal in natural populations: a method for tracking individual pollen grains. Syst Bot 4:223–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson C (1887a) Insect relations of certain asclepiads. II. Bot Gaz 12:244–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson C (1887b) Insect relations of certain asclepiads. I. Bot Gaz 12:207–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlising RA, Turpin RA (1971) Hummingbird dispersal of Delphinium cardinale pollen treated with radioactive iodine. Amer J Bot 58:401–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt J (1980) Pollinator foraging behavior and gene dispersal in Senecio (Compositae). Evolution 34:934–943

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass RE (1956) Anatomy of the honey bee. Cornell University Press Ithaca New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JD, Plowright RC (1980) Pollen carryover, nectar rewards, and pollinator behavior with special reference to Diervilla lonicera. Oecologia (Berl) 46:68–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C, Eriksson T, Lundberg H (1979) The wood white butterfly Leptidea sinapis and its nectar plants: a case of mutualism or parasitism? Oikos 33:358–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodson RE (1954) The North American species of Asclepias L. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 41:1–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt R (1976) Pollination and fruit-set in Asclepias: a reappraisal. Amer J Bot 63:845–851

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morse, D.H. The turnover of milkweed pollinia on bumble bees, and implications for outcrossing. Oecologia 53, 187–196 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00545662

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00545662

Keywords

Navigation