Advertisement

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 197–210 | Cite as

A method for monitoring ground water quality near waste storage facilities

  • Paul F. Hudak
Article

Abstract

A practical optimization approach developed in this paper derives effective monitoring configurations for detecting contaminants in ground water. The approach integrates numerical simulation of contaminant transport and mathematical programming. Well sites identified by the methodology can be monitored to establish the occurrence of a contaminant release before a plume migrates to a regulatory compliance boundary. Monitoring sites are established along several horizons located between the downgradient margin of a contaminant source and a compliance boundary. A horizon can form an effective line of defense against contaminant migration to the compliance boundary if it is spanned (covered) by a sufficient number of sites to yield a well spacing that is equal to or less than a maximum value established by numerical modeling. The objective function of the integer programming model formulation expresses the goals of: (1) covering a maximum number of siting horizons, and (2) allocating wells to the single most effective horizon. The latter is determined from well spacing requirements and the width of the zone of potential contaminant migration traversed by the horizon. The methodology employs a highly tractable linear programming model formulation, and the user is not required to predefine a set of potential well sites. These attributes can facilitate its implementation in practice.

Keywords

Ground Water Monitoring Site Storage Facility Linear Programming Model Contaminant Transport 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahlfeld, D.P. and Pinder, G.F.: 1988, ‘A Ground Water Monitoring Network Design Algorithm’, Report 87-WR-4, Department of Civil Engineering and Operations Research, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  2. Buller, R.D., Gradet, A., and Reed, V.S.: 1984, ‘Ground Water Monitoring System Design in a Complex Geologic Setting’, in Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Aquifer Restoration and Ground Water Monitoring, National Water Well Association, Worthington, OH, 186–194.Google Scholar
  3. Everett, L.G.: 1980, Ground Water Monitoring, General Electric Company, Schenectady, NY.Google Scholar
  4. Grubb, S.: 1993, ‘Analytical Model for Estimation of Steady-state Capture Zones of Pumping Wells in Confined and Unconfined Aquifers’, Ground Water 31 (1), 27–32.Google Scholar
  5. Land, A.H. and Doig, A.: 1960, ‘An Automatic Method of Solving Discrete Programming Problems’, Econometrica 28, 497–520.Google Scholar
  6. Loaiciga, H.A., Charbeneau, R.J., Everett, L.G., Fogg, G.E., Hobbs, B.F., and Rouhani, S.: 1992, ‘Review of Ground Water Quality Monitoring Network Design’, Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 118 (1), 11–37.Google Scholar
  7. Massmann, J. and Freeze, R.A.: 1987a, ‘Groundwater Contamination From Waste Management Sites: The Interaction Between Risk-based Engineering Design and Regulatory Policy, 1. Methodology’, Water Resources Research 23 (2), 351–367.Google Scholar
  8. Massmann, J. and Freeze, R.A.: 1987b, ‘Groundwater Contamination From Waste Management Sites: The Interaction Between Risk-based Engineering Design and Regulatory Policy, 2. Results’, Water Resources Research 23 (2), 351–367.Google Scholar
  9. Meyer, P.D. and Brill, E.D.: 1988, ‘Method for Locating Wells in a Groundwater Monitoring Network Under Conditions of Uncertainty’, Water Resources Research 24 (8), 1277–1282.Google Scholar
  10. Meyer, P.D., Ranjitham, R., Valocchi, A.J., and Eheart, J.W.: 1989, ‘Groundwater Monitoring Network Design Using Coupled Monte Carlo Simulation and Optimization’, in Proceedings of the 1989 National Conference of Hydraulics Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY, 404–409.Google Scholar
  11. Schrage, L.: 1991, LINDO — An Optimization Modeling System, Scientific Press, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  12. United States Environmental Protection Agency: 1986, RCRA Ground Water Monitoring Technical Enforcement Guidance Document, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Zheng, C.: 1990, MT3D — A Modular Three-Dimensional Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion and Chemical Reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems, S.S. Papadopulos and Associates, Rockville, MD.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul F. Hudak
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations