Skip to main content
Log in

Ticrynafen and hydrochlorothiazide a comparison in hypertensive patients with renal impairment

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The efficacy of ticrynafen in the treatment of hypertension in patients with moderate renal impairment was compared with that of hydrochlorothiazide in a randomised, double-blind crossover trial in eleven subjects with renal insufficiency. Significant reductions in blood pressure occurred with both treatments, with the maximum responses occurring at different time intervals and to different degrees in individual patients. Thus, although ticrynafen caused a significant reduction in blood pressure in this group of hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency, it was not consistently different from that which could be achieved with hydrochlorothiazide. Ticrynafen also significantly reduced the serum uric acid concentration, compared with a significant rise with hydrochlorothiazide. No major biochemical abnormalities or side-effects were encountered in any subject. Thus, in these patients with renal insufficiency, ticrynafen still demonstrated a uricosuric effect as well as a useful anti-hypertensive action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bennett WM, van Zee BE, Hutchings RMD (1979) Acute renal failure from ticrynafen. N Engl J Med 301: 1179

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen LH, Norby LH, Champion C, Spargo B (1979) Acute renal failure from ticrynafen. N Engl J Med 301: 1180

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frohlich ED (1979) A new thiazide-like but uricosuric antihypertensive diuretic. N Engl J Med 301: 1378–1382

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gillies AHB, Morgan TD (1978) A double-blind comparison of the effects of hydrochlorothiazide and tienilic acid (a diuretic with uricosuric properties) in hypertension. Br J Clin Pharmacol 6: 357–362

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lechi A, Covi G, Danti G, Dalla Riva A, Pedrolli E, Pomari S (1979) An evaluation of tienilic acid, a new diuretic uricosuric agent, in the therapy of arterial hypertension. Clin Sci 57: 367s-369s.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McLain DA, Garriga FJ, Kantor OS (1980) Adverse reactions associated with ticrynafen use. J Am Med Assoc 243: 763–764

    Google Scholar 

  7. Miller SA, Vertes V (1979) Ticrynafen and hydrochlorothiazide: A double-blind study of antihypertensive properties with an open crossover. J Am Med Assoc 241: 2174–2176

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nemati M, Kyle MD, and Freis ED (1977) Clinical study of ticrynafen: A new diuretic, antihypertensive and uricosuric agent. J Am Med Assoc 237: 652–657

    Google Scholar 

  9. Selby T (1979) Acute renal failure from ticrynafen. N ENgl J Med 301: 1180–1181

    Google Scholar 

  10. Simpson FD, Waal-Manning HJ (1980) Total ban on tienilic acid. Lancet 1: 978–979

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Emmerson, B.T., Renshaw, P.J., Ravenscroft, P.J. et al. Ticrynafen and hydrochlorothiazide a comparison in hypertensive patients with renal impairment. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 22, 203–206 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00545215

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00545215

Key words

Navigation