Summary
A double-blind, randomised, crossover trial was undertaken to compare the analgesic effects of a single dose of paracetamol (1000 mg i. v.) with placebo in the immediate post-operative period following removal of impacted lower third molars. There was no significant difference in the pain relief between paracetamol and placebo in the first hour following injection. Thereafter, there was significantly less pain (P<0.05) after treatment with paracetamol than after placebo. Plasma concentrations of paracetamol were measured and pharmacokinetic variables were determined. Over the four hour period of investigation there was no clear relationship between analgesia and paracetamol concentration in either central or peripheral compartments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitken RCB (1969) Measurement of feeling using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med 62: 989–993
Album B, Olsen I, Lokken P (1977) Bilateral surgical removal of impacted 8/8 as a model for drug evaluation: a test with oxyphenbutazone. Int J Oral Surg 6: 177–189
Berkowitz BA, Asling MD, Shnider SM, Way EL (1969) Relationship of pentazocine plasma levels to pharmacological activity in man. Clin Pharmacol Ther 10: 320–328
Cooper SA, Beaver WT (1976) A model to evaluate mild analgesics in oral surgery. Clin Pharmacol Ther 20: 241–250
Cummings AJ, King ML, Martin BK (1967) A kinetic study of drug elimination: the excretion of paracetamol and its metabolites in man. Br J Pharmacol 29: 150–157
Ferreira SM, Vane JR (1974) New aspects of the mode of action of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs. Annu Rev Pharmacol 14: 57–73
Gibaldi M, Perrier D (1977) Pharmacokinetics. Marcel Dekker, New York
Heading RC, Nimmo J, Prescott LF, Tothill P (1973) The dependence of paracetamol absorption on the rate of gastric emptying. Br J Pharmacol 47: 415–421
Koch-Weser J (1976) Drug therapy — acetaminophen. N Engl J Med 295: 1297–1300
Lokken P, Olsen I, Bruaset I, Norman-Pederson K (1975) Bilateral surgical removal of impacted lower third molars as a model for drug evaluation: a test with Ibuprofen. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 8: 208–216
Masson AHB (1966) The value and limitations of subjective assessment of pain and analgesia. Proc R Soc Med 59: (Suppl) 81–84
Nayman J (1979) Measurement and control of post-operative pain. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 61: 419–426
Prescott LF (1971) The gas-liquid chromatographic estimation of phenacetin and paracetamol in plasma and urine. J Pharm Pharmacol 23: 111–115
Rawlins MD, Henderson DB, Hijab AR (1977) Pharmacokinetics of paracetamol (acetaminophen) after intravenous and oral administration. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 11: 283–286
Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MIJ (1976) The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 31: 1191–1198
Riggs DS (1963) The mathematical approach to physiological problems. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore
Skjelbred P, Album B, Lokken P (1977) Acetylsalicylic acid v's paracetamol: effects on post-operative course. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 12: 257–264
Skjelbred P, Lokken P (1979) Paracetamol versus placebo: effects on post-operative course. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 15: 27–33
Sveen K, Gilhuus-Moe O (1975) Paracetamol/codeine in relieving pain following removal of impacted third molars. Int J Oral Surg 4: 258–266
Van Gool AV, Ten-Bosch JJ, Boering G (1977) Clinical consequences of complaints and complications after removal of the mandibular third molar. Int J Oral Surg 6: 29–37
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Seymour, R.A., Rawlins, M.D. Pharmacokinetics of parenteral paracetamol and its analgesic effects in post-operative dental pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 20, 215–218 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00544600
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00544600