European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

, Volume 28, Issue 5, pp 523–529 | Cite as

Peripheral antihistamine and central sedative effects of three H1-receptor antagonists

  • S. Levander
  • Ö. Hägermark
  • M. Ståhle
Originals

Summary

The effects of single oral doses of three antihistamine compounds on histamine-induced itch and flare reactions were studied in 24 healthy volunteers by a double-blind balanced design. Central sedative effects were concurrently analyzed using a set of computerized neuropsychological tests and analogue ratings. Hydroxyzine 20 mg had a more pronounced inhibitory effect on the cutaneous response than 3 mg clemastine or 3 mg azatadine. Clemastine tended to cause more sedation than the other two drugs. A compound score, reflecting the balance between peripheral and CNS effects, showed hydroxyzine to have relatively more peripheral antihistamine effect and less sedative effect than the other two drugs. The independence of peripheral and CNS antihistamine effects was also suggested by correlation analysis. Subjects displayed individual sensitivity to the peripheral antihistamine effect of the three drugs; a marked antihistamine effect of one drug predicted a marked effect of the other two drugs. This was not the case for CNS sedation. The independence of peripheral and CNS effects should encourage development of new and more specific antihistamine compounds.

Key words

hydroxyzine clemastine azatadine skin responses sedation vigilance antihistamines peripheral histamine effects central antihistamine effects 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alvan G, Ericsson Ö, Levander S, Lindgren JE (1974) Plasma concentration and effects of the hypnotic methaqualone after single and multiple oral doses in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 7: 419–424Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borland RG, Nicholson AN (1974) Human performance after a barbiturate (heptabarbitone). Br J Clin Pharmacol 1: 209–215Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Day ES, Jones S, Stewart-Jones J, Turner P (1972) Clemastine on eye-hand coordination and visual function. J Clin Pharmacol 12: 240–246Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fjellner B, Hägermark Ö (1981) Studies on pruritogenic and histamine-releasing effects of some putative peptide neurotransmitters. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 61: 245–250Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hedges A, Hills M, Maclay WP, Newman-Taylor AJ, Turner (1971) Some central and peripheral effects of clemastine, a new antihistamine drug, in man. J Clin Pharmacol 11: 112–119Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hays WL (1969) Statistics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hillas JL, Somerfield SD, Wilson JD, Aman MG (1980) Azatadine maleate in perennial allergic rhinitis: effects on clinical symptoms and choice reaction time. Br J Clin Pharmacol 10: 573–577Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Landauer AA, Milner G (1971) Antihistamines, alone and together with alcohol in relation to driving safety. J Forens Med 18: 127–139Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Levander S, Bartfai A, Schalling D (1985) Regional cortical dysfunction in schizophrenic patients studied by computerized neuropsychological methods. Percept Mot Skills (in press)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mueser K, Waller D, Levander S, Schalling D (1984) Smoking and pain — A method of limits and sensory decision theory analysis. Scand J Psychol 25: 289–296Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nicholson AN, Stone BM (1982) Performance studies with the H1-histamine receptor antagonists, astemizole and terfenadine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 13: 199–202Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peck AW, Fowler ASE, Bye C (1975) A comparison of triprolidine and clemastine on histamine antagonism and performance tests in man: implications for the mechanism of drug induced drowsiness. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 8: 455–463Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Swets JA (1977) Signal detection theory applied to vigilance. In: RR Mackie (ed) Vigilance: theory, operational performance and physiological correlates. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Uzan A, LeFur G, Malgouris C (1979) Are antihistamines sedative via a blockade of brain H1 receptors? J Pharm Pharmacol 31: 701–702Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weiner M (1982) Sedation and antihistaminics. Arzneimittelforsch/Drug Res 32: 1193–1195Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winer BJ (1979) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Levander
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ö. Hägermark
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Ståhle
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of DermatologyKarolinska InstituteStockholm
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and PsychologyKarolinska InstituteStockholm

Personalised recommendations