Summary
A monoclonal antibody raised to gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) has been compared with conventional rabbit and guinea-pig antisera to GIP. Four staining methods were tested and of these the peroxidase antiperoxidase (PAP) method proved to give the best results with both the mouse and rabbit antibodies. The monoclonal antibody, when used to stain pancreatic tissue, gave negative results whereas a distinct population of gut endocrine cells was readily demonstrable, suggesting that GIP is not a constituent of the mammalian pancreas. The monoclonal antibody was found to be the most sensitive for immunocytochemistry achieving the titre of 1:106 in rat gut. A C-terminal specific antibody, with a high affinity and avidity to GIP, it was clearly the preferred antibody for immunocytochemical studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alumets J, Hakanson R, O'Dorisio T, Sjolund K, Sundler F (1978) Is GIP a glucagon cell constituent? Histochemistry 58:253–256
Bloom SR, Polak JM (1978) Gut hormone overview. In: Bloom SR (ed) Gut hormones. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 3–18
Brown, JC, Frost JL, Kwauk S, Otte SC, McIntosh CHS (1980) Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide (GIP): isolation, structure and basic functions. In: Glass GJ (ed) Gastrointestinal hormones. Raven Press, New York, pp 223–232
Brown JC, Dahl M, Kwauk S, McIntosh CHS, Muller, M, Otte S, Pederson RA (1982) Properties and actions of GIP. In: Polak JM, Bloom SR (eds) Gut hormones, 2nd edit. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 248–255
Buchan AMJ, Polak JM, Capella C, Solcia E, Pearse AGE (1978) Electron immunocytochemical evidence for the K cell localisation of Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide (GIP) in man. Histochemistry 56:37–44
Buchan AMJ, Lance V, Polak JM (1982) The reptilian endocrine pancreas — An immunocytochemical study. In: Lofts B (ed) Proc. 9th Int. Symp. Comparative Endocrinology (in press)
Buffa R, Polak JM, Pearse AGE, Solcia E, Grimelius L, Capella C (1975) Identification of the intestinal cell storing Gastric Inhibitory Peptide. Histochemistry 43:249–255
Coons AH, Leduc EH, Connolly JM (1955) Studies on antibody production 1. A method for the histochemical demonstration of specific antibody and its application to a study of the hyperimmune rabbit. J Exp Med 102:49–59
El-Salhy M, Grimelius L (1981) Immunohistochemical localisation of gastrin C-terminus, gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP) and endorphin in the pancreas of lizards with special reference to the hibernation period. Reg Pep 2:97–112
Ingman-Baker J, Buchan AMJ, Brown JC, Levy J (1982) The use of the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for the characterisation of a monoclonal antibody with specificity for Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide (GIP). Diabetologia (submitted)
Larsson L-I, Moody AJ (1980) Glicentin and Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide immunoreactivity in endocrine cells of the gut and pancreas. J Histochem Cytochem 28:925–933
Leduque P, Gespach C, Brown JC, Rosselin G, Dubois PM: Ontogeny of gastric inhibitory peptide in the human gastro-intestinal tract & endocrine pancreas. Acta Endocrinol 99:112–121
Lund PK, Goodman RH, Dee PC, Habener JF (1982) Pancreatic preproglucagon cDNA contains two glucagon-related coding sequences arranged in tandem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:345–349
Pearse AGE, Polak JM (1975) Bifunctional reagents as vapour and liquid phase fixatives for immunohistochemistry. Histochem J 7:179–186
Polak JM, Bloom SR, Kusio M, Brown JC, Pearse AGE (1973) Cellular localisation of gastric inhibitory polypeptide in the duodenum and jejunum. Gut 14:284–288
Sternberger L (1979) Immunocytochemistry, 2nd edit.Wiley & Sons, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buchan, A.M.J., Ingman-Baker, J., Levy, J. et al. A comparison of the ability of serum and monoclonal antibodies to gastric inhibitory polypeptide to detect immunoreactive cells in the gastroenteropancreatic system of mammals and reptiles. Histochemistry 76, 341–349 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00543956
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00543956